• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Can the U.S. even pull off an attack on Iran?

JASANITY

Senior member
The U.S. is already stretched in Afghanistan and Iraq... does starting an attack on Iran mean Afghanistan will be the 3rd priority, and catching Bin Laden, who did plan the attack on the U.S. will be forgotten? How funny it is that most of the U.S. has blindly followed Bush from the main target, Bin Laden, to Iraq and now Iran... Where were those weapons of mass destruction again? I called Bush finding any reason he could to invade Iraq the first year he was in office. I called the lies about weapons of mass destruction(he's an easy guy to read), and I also called the U.S. having major problems with martial law in Iraq. I am now calling that the U.S. will be 100% screwed both economically(already terrible), and defense/military-wise if they foolishly decide to attack Iran. It's great to hear that there may be plans to use nuclear weapons?! Maybe this will pave the way to a larger budget for the war efforts, and thus a larger deficit once the true amount of Bush's irresponsible spending comes to light in 2008...

On a side note, I did call Lebron being the NBA All-Star MVP, and Yao as the best Center in the NBA =) Also the stocks I have chosen are up over 80% for the past year. Ok enough gloating...
 
:roll:

wrong forum asshat

Yes an attack on Iran is feasible.

Oh and sense this was likely sparked by the "news" of possible plans for using tactical nukes why wouldn't there be a plan on the table that considered their use?
 
Originally posted by: JASANITY
The U.S. is already stretched in Afghanistan and Iraq... does starting an attack on Iran mean Afghanistan will be the 3rd priority, and catching Bin Laden, who did plan the attack on the U.S. will be forgotten? How funny it is that most of the U.S. has blindly followed Bush from the main target, Bin Laden, to Iraq and now Iran... Where were those weapons of mass destruction again? I called Bush finding any reason he could to invade Iraq the first year he was in office. I called the lies about weapons of mass destruction(he's an easy guy to read), and I also called the U.S. having major problems with martial law in Iraq. I am now calling that the U.S. will be 100% screwed both economically(already terrible), and defense/military-wise if they foolishly decide to attack Iran. It's great to hear that there may be plans to use nuclear weapons?! Maybe this will pave the way to a larger budget for the war efforts, and thus a larger deficit once the true amount of Bush's irresponsible spending comes to light in 2008...

On a side note, I did call Lebron being the NBA All-Star MVP, and Yao as the best Center in the NBA =) Also the stocks I have chosen are up over 80% for the past year. Ok enough gloating...

well shiz boys, we've got ourselves a psychic here.

Why don't you run for president if you can read the future :disgust:
 
haha, well I posted it here because no one replies to the political and news messages as frequent as ATOT and this event will have a huge effect on us all. Looks like the U.S. is another business for Bush to run into the ground. I'll run for president if ATOT can nominate me and support the campaign costs =)
 
Originally posted by: JASANITY
haha, well I posted it here because no one replies to the political and news messages as frequent as ATOT and this event will have a huge effect on us all. Looks like the U.S. is another business for Bush to run into the ground. I'll run for president if ATOT can nominate me and support the campaign costs =)

bullshit, P&N is just as active.
 
See.....wasn't it much easier to get the circlejerk you wanted by posting in the playpen?



 
Originally posted by: FallenHero
Why are then P&N people invading OT lately?

Because there are like 50 threads on Iran in P&N and the chances that anyone will reply in the short time that they want is very rare.

Off Topic gets you a reply in less than a minute
 
Originally posted by: JASANITY
The U.S. is already stretched in Afghanistan and Iraq... does starting an attack on Iran mean Afghanistan will be the 3rd priority, and catching Bin Laden, who did plan the attack on the U.S. will be forgotten? How funny it is that most of the U.S. has blindly followed Bush from the main target, Bin Laden, to Iraq and now Iran... Where were those weapons of mass destruction again? I called Bush finding any reason he could to invade Iraq the first year he was in office. I called the lies about weapons of mass destruction(he's an easy guy to read), and I also called the U.S. having major problems with martial law in Iraq. I am now calling that the U.S. will be 100% screwed both economically(already terrible), and defense/military-wise if they foolishly decide to attack Iran. It's great to hear that there may be plans to use nuclear weapons?! Maybe this will pave the way to a larger budget for the war efforts, and thus a larger deficit once the true amount of Bush's irresponsible spending comes to light in 2008...

On a side note, I did call Lebron being the NBA All-Star MVP, and Yao as the best Center in the NBA =) Also the stocks I have chosen are up over 80% for the past year. Ok enough gloating...

Hey smartass...go play the lotto. Can I be in your almighty presence for 5 minutes please? Maybe some of your awesomo will rub off on me. I can only hope to be as awesome as you.
 
Its not an attack its a "liberation". I think our brain dead population is bored of the iraq mini series and wants to watch a new show in a different genre, or at least a different venue. I just don't think Bush has the public support necessary to continue playing desert cowboy.
 
Back
Top