Can someone please tell me if this looks right (PICS)

avi85

Senior member
Apr 24, 2006
988
0
0
if you have another divider which can bring it closer to it's most stable speed then use it.
 

n7

Elite Member
Jan 4, 2004
21,281
4
81
You don't say what your mobo is, so i have no idea what dividers you'd have available, but you could try running 8.5x295 (2507 MHz) with the 133 divider.
That will put your RAM @ 193 aka DDR386.
 

RallyMaster

Diamond Member
Dec 28, 2004
5,581
0
0
Athlon64s don't run at a fractional multiplier. The whole Abit-USA forum has already tried it and it just plainly doesn't work.
 

n7

Elite Member
Jan 4, 2004
21,281
4
81
Originally posted by: RallyMaster
Athlon64s don't run at a fractional multiplier. The whole Abit-USA forum has already tried it and it just plainly doesn't work.

Really? :laugh:

How exactly did you come to that conclusion?

I am presently using a half multi to my advantage, & oh yes, it works ;)

9x289 (2601 MHz) with 133 divider (DDR372)
8.5x306 (2601 Mhz) with 133 divider (DDR400)

Oh noes, the half multi is even beating the whole multi in performance, since it brings my RAM to its rated 200 speed vs. the underclocked 186 speed. :roll:

Now please tell me how it is that half multis don't work again.



 

Regs

Lifer
Aug 9, 2002
16,666
21
81
My K8T did that as well. It auto-detects a working divider for the memory. I guess the memory couldnt handle the cut. I ran a 5:3 divider (after taking it off auto), I suggest you do the same. However the max overclock I get is 2.5 Ghz with a 5:3 until I get BSOD's. At least the memory was at 200Mhz though.

I also used clockgen to set the over clock to figure out 2.5-2.6GHz was the max. Clockgen is a handy over clock tool to use while windows is booted up. Without it I would of been stuck on boot with the bios auto dectecting some absurd divider like the one you have set now.