I haven't worked with any MS Visual apps for years, and even then it was only briefly.
My understanding was that there were several Visual programming flavors of generic languages (C++, Basic, etc.) and that "Studio" simply was a packaging of all of the main flavors together. Thought of another way: Visual Studio was a Microsoft standardized way of developing/programming, and you could plug-in different languages that were tweaked to work with that standard.
Now there is this new .NET Framework, which I believe includes C.NET and Basic.NET.
I can also buy Visual Studio 2008.
I can also buy Visual Studio .NET.
If .NET languages are again a new MS standard of various languages, then is is VS .NET simply a packaging of all the main .NET languages with the Visual Studio program?
The reason I am asking this is because I am doing a research project that requires me to classify what "platforms" are supported by particular software developers and their applications. Some of them specify that they support Visual Studio and some of them say they support .NET. Others specify Visual Studio .NET. These days, does one imply the other? Or is it important to differentiate Visual Studio support with .NET support?
My understanding was that there were several Visual programming flavors of generic languages (C++, Basic, etc.) and that "Studio" simply was a packaging of all of the main flavors together. Thought of another way: Visual Studio was a Microsoft standardized way of developing/programming, and you could plug-in different languages that were tweaked to work with that standard.
Now there is this new .NET Framework, which I believe includes C.NET and Basic.NET.
I can also buy Visual Studio 2008.
I can also buy Visual Studio .NET.
If .NET languages are again a new MS standard of various languages, then is is VS .NET simply a packaging of all the main .NET languages with the Visual Studio program?
The reason I am asking this is because I am doing a research project that requires me to classify what "platforms" are supported by particular software developers and their applications. Some of them specify that they support Visual Studio and some of them say they support .NET. Others specify Visual Studio .NET. These days, does one imply the other? Or is it important to differentiate Visual Studio support with .NET support?