Can someone explain this to me?

[SSSnail]

http://enr.sos.state.tx.us/enr/mar04_136_state.htm

Scroll down to district 26th, look at the Early Votes.

Mistyped? What's going on here?

RACE NAME DELEGATES EARLY VOTES PERCENT TOTAL VOTES PERCENT
President, Senatorial District 26
Joe Biden 0 181 0.97% 124 0.13%
Hillary Clinton 2 1 0.00% 55,439 61.32%
Christopher J. Dodd 0 0 0.00% 112 0.12%
John Edwards 0 1,183 6.35% 380 0.42%
Barack Obama 2 17,202 92.38% 33,968 37.57%
Bill Richardson 0 52 0.27% 379 0.41%
----------- -----------
Race Total 18,619 90,402
Precincts Reported 266 of 266 Precincts 100.00%

 

[LtPage1]

Diebold ftw?

 

[Siddhartha]

The table contains both "early" and final vote totals.

Mr Obama was leading in the early voting and Ms Clinton won in the final vote totals.

 

[NaughtyGeek]

I'll tell you what seems really fishy, the fact that in all but 2 districts, Hillary went up in percentage for the late vote. What was the difference in voting methods, if any, between early and late voting?

 

[Fern]

Originally posted by: Siddhartha
The table contains both "early" and final vote totals.

Mr Obama was leading in the early voting and Ms Clinton won in the final vote totals.

Yes, but to me anyway, the percentage swing between the early votes and "regular" vote is so huge as to require explaination. While I wouldn't expect the exact %'s, it seems odd that the earlier votes aren't more consistant with the total votes.

Fern

 

[ShotgunSteven]

Obama is obviously the target of a Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy?.