Originally posted by: eigen
I in no way see how the above scenario is the outcome of a capitalist system. However, in your dystopian capitalist worldview at least there is no coercion. However in your socialist/mixed system there is coercion on a daily basis. Remeber live free or die "Give me liberty or give me death" Some of us believe it.
As far as refuting your statement I am not an economist and so I will refer you to those more qualified than myself. writings by the following would be a place to start (they are my favs :thumbsup
Murray Rothbard
Ludwig Mises
Originally posted by: chrisms
My statement can't be refuted. It happened here and in Britain, with only a few differences to what I said. And if that system had been given more time to develop it would had only worsened.
Originally posted by: DWW
Communism is a good idea (if you are religious) and in theory it would be great...
But I'm not religious and I don't really think all humans on earth are equal. That said I am not claiming to be in the "better" part but I think the worth of humans differ on many scales from the IQ level to their physical ability and so forth.
I'm not suggesting the lower end of the spectrum are worthless meat or some such but I think there is a distint difference between the worth of Einstein to the worth of say, 50 cent.
Originally posted by: loki8481
me neither, but I guess that's why I'm a communist at heart
I think that some people *coughprotestants* are raised to believe that more is always better.
fortunately, my parents are both agnostic, communist hippies![]()
Originally posted by: NightCrawler
Originally posted by: DWW
Communism is a good idea (if you are religious) and in theory it would be great...
But I'm not religious and I don't really think all humans on earth are equal. That said I am not claiming to be in the "better" part but I think the worth of humans differ on many scales from the IQ level to their physical ability and so forth.
I'm not suggesting the lower end of the spectrum are worthless meat or some such but I think there is a distint difference between the worth of Einstein to the worth of say, 50 cent.
What, there was no God under Communism only the state.
What was that Reagan Joke about God and potatoes ?
Originally posted by: DWW
Originally posted by: NightCrawler
Originally posted by: DWW
Communism is a good idea (if you are religious) and in theory it would be great...
But I'm not religious and I don't really think all humans on earth are equal. That said I am not claiming to be in the "better" part but I think the worth of humans differ on many scales from the IQ level to their physical ability and so forth.
I'm not suggesting the lower end of the spectrum are worthless meat or some such but I think there is a distint difference between the worth of Einstein to the worth of say, 50 cent.
What, there was no God under Communism only the state.
What was that Reagan Joke about God and potatoes ?
No, many communist countries don't have religion. I was merely pointing out that most (true) religious people would agree with all other features of communism. It would be foolish to think that Jesus was not a communist type of personality and I'm not even a Christian.
Originally posted by: chrisms
My statement can't be refuted. It happened here and in Britain, with only a few differences to what I said. And if that system had been given more time to develop it would had only worsened.
Originally posted by: eigen
Originally posted by: chrisms
Originally posted by: eigen
I do not exist for others, and I recognize no authority higher than mine own. (While doing the same for others).Socialism (in all its forms) is the most vile idea ever spawned on earth.
No it isn't... a purely capitalist state can turn out just as bad.
HOW.
Originally posted by: Drift3r
One of the reasons why religion is frowned upon by Communists is the fact that the Catholic church at one point in time was actually the biggest land owner and the wealthiest institution around in Europe. The Catholic church had a vast amount of power over the common people as well.
Also NAZI Germany was a socialist run state. While the NAZI government controlled the main industrial industries they still allowed private firms to work within and outside of government controlled industries. Porsche and Volkswagen were two of many privately own companies that enjoyed a lot of work orders from the NAZI government. In fact Porsche was given a favored status within the NAZI regime because their owners were good friends with high ranking NAZI officials. So in socialism the economy is controlled very closely by the government but private companies are still allowed to operate within the confines of this system. It's what some call a managed economy which was at one point in Europe seen as a model to a bright future when compared to the problems people saw and felt with un-restricted pure capitalism during the industrial revolution.
You have to remember that at the time there were no checks and balances in place to protect the economies of Europe when pure capitalism was tried out. So many countries did end up with economic problems because they did not know how to exactly implement capitalism and still protect their economies from the up's and down's you see in a capitalist economy. In our country we have certain checks and balances to protect us from events like the crash of the stock market in 1929 along with other prior events that at one time gave capitalism a black eye.
Funny thing is that most hardcore socialist view communism as a perversion of their ideals. The writer George Orwell was a democratic socialist and he in fact wrote the book "1984" as a attack against communism and what he perceived as a selling out of the values and ideals that the democratic socialists wanted. What's even more amazing is that most of the stuff he wrote about in the book "1984" actually was taking place in Stalinist Russia prior to the book coming out ! At the time that this book did come out ( 1949 ) people still did not know anything about the horrors of Stalinist Russia. The world did not find out about the horrors of the Stalinist Regime in Russia until 20 years after Stalin's death ! Also as Hitler and his NAZI members also hated and loathed communism as well but they were what we call nationalist socialists.
Originally posted by: Crimson
Socialism = What liberals THINK they want.
Communism = What liberals actually get when they try to implement socialism.
Originally posted by: LunarRay
Originally posted by: Mark
?
Total Capitalism on one end and total Communism on the other with everything inbetween being Socialism. We are more toward the Capitalism side and Sweden is toward the Communism side. I don't thing either extreme is possible in any nation of size. Maybe Monaco or like that but, If there are class structures you've got to have some Socialism and if you have few you have to have some Socialism. Maybe there is no such thing as Capitalism or Communism and every thing is some degree of Socialism.
Originally posted by: boran
Originally posted by: eigen
Originally posted by: chrisms
Originally posted by: eigen
I do not exist for others, and I recognize no authority higher than mine own. (While doing the same for others).Socialism (in all its forms) is the most vile idea ever spawned on earth.
No it isn't... a purely capitalist state can turn out just as bad.
HOW.
europe around the end of 19th start of 20th century, 8 year olds working 15 hrs a day to get enough money to pay for food on the table from the factory owned shops while living with 15 on a 15 by 15 feet house owned by the factory.
the rich OWNED the poor, THAT is liberalism/capitalism in it's purest form, and that is where marx and all communists/socialists protested against.
average life expectancy here for the rich was around 60 to 70 for teh poor it was 30 at most (tuberculosis and dustlung being most common cause of death) I suggest you check the backgrounds of where ideas came from, neither pure socialism nor liberalism are workable imho, a balance between the two are the only way you can have people earning money and at the same time prevent people from totally falling out of the boat, I suggest you look into the numbers of homeless and average wages and such, the U.S. is not the rich country it thinks it is, it has a very rich population, but that's countred by a huge number of poor people, from which the rich essentially leech. I'm not saying it's much better overhere, I'm just stating that you need to look around and see what is going on around you.
Originally posted by: DeeKnow
Originally posted by: LunarRay
Originally posted by: Mark
?
Total Capitalism on one end and total Communism on the other with everything inbetween being Socialism. We are more toward the Capitalism side and Sweden is toward the Communism side. I don't thing either extreme is possible in any nation of size. Maybe Monaco or like that but, If there are class structures you've got to have some Socialism and if you have few you have to have some Socialism. Maybe there is no such thing as Capitalism or Communism and every thing is some degree of Socialism.
Please tell me that you are not serious ....
(or that you have no clue where Sweden is...)
Originally posted by: vanln
8:00 AM to 4:00 PM
Everybody go to work . Salary ( what is that???) . Every month goverment will give you . ( 1pound of sugar, 1 cartoon of cigarettes, 10 pounds of rice, 3/4 pound of porc or beef . If you work hard they will give you couple pair of shoe or shirt .
Wow the amount of misconception on governments is ridiculous!Originally posted by: Genesys
in the perfect form of communism there is no government. all recourses are controlled by the people and distributed equally.
in socialism, there is a government and it controlls the means to manufacture everything and distributes the goods according the ammount of work you do.
Sweden used to be very socialistic. They used to have an 80% tax rate! This is until everyone started doing everything illegally and under the table to avoid the government taxing them, that they decided that 80% was too much and lowered it. So now Sweden shifted towards capitalism, but before the socialism was near communism.Many Americans think that Sweden is extremely socialistic or even communistic even though it is one of the countries in Europe that is most capitalistic.
If Sweden is socialistic or communistic i would like to know what it takes to qualify as a socialist or communist country.
Sweden used to be very socialistic. They used to have an 80% tax rate! This is until everyone started doing everything illegally and under the table to avoid the government taxing them, that they decided that 80% was too much and lowered it. So now Sweden shifted towards capitalism, but before the socialism was near communism.[/quote]Many Americans think that Sweden is extremely socialistic or even communistic even though it is one of the countries in Europe that is most capitalistic.
If Sweden is socialistic or communistic i would like to know what it takes to qualify as a socialist or communist country.