Originally posted by: PKing1977
He does not stir me up. I just think for a man with "talent on loan from god" that he could find new material..
PKing
Riiiight... that's why you started this thread.
Originally posted by: PKing1977
He does not stir me up. I just think for a man with "talent on loan from god" that he could find new material..
PKing
OxyCotin is a hell of a drug!Originally posted by: PKing1977
He does not stir me up. I just think for a man with "talent on loan from god" that he could find new material..
PKing
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
Rush is rich. Duh. He got that way by finding a group of people he could stir up and get to listen to him. These folks have certain things they want to hear, and he fills their need. In other words, he's found a viable market to sell his wares. He's making a mint and effectively being paid to say what he does.
Just like Al Franken, right?
The Rush supporters want to hear bad things about the left, and good things about the right, or at least about the current administration. So he hits on Clinton, Kennedy, and others because they are most visible, and in truth Kennedy is pretty slimey, much more than Clinton. Consequently he will always do what he does. Make money, and that is by saying things, and as Pabster demonstrates people will buy it at truth, in spite of the fact that many of his fallacies are so easily shown up as deception. He's not there to sell truth, but to sell what Pabster wants to hear.
He's an entertainer, and I often find him amusing. Rush too![]()
I hate to bust your balls but I haven't listened to Rush for YEARS. I just find it amusing that he stirs up the liberals so much.![]()
I won't completely disagree with your point; because I tend to agree with much of Rush's discussion, even if I don't like the guy. However, the 'bolded' words above describe quite accurately about 75% of ATPN; that being the Left minded folk here. Oh alright, there are a few RW nutjobs here too. The scales tip in balance of the LL thoughOriginally posted by: PKing1977
I am referring to every broadcast. I work only 7 miles from my apartment and in the time it takes me to drive home (15mins) I listen to the show. Everyday Rush brings up Clinton, this is not some current news item but a sick fasination. Rush's format really needs to evolve because he cannot blaim everything on Clinton anymore (even though he still trys).
PKing
Yeah, pretty hard to ignore...Originally posted by: Condor
I sympathize with him. The nausea is hard to ignore. Just like a cat and a hairball.
The only "so-called" embodiment going on around here is the broad sweeping and inaccurate generalization that is waged upon anyone who isn't rabidly Left.Originally posted by: Sudheer Anne
Rush embodies the so-called "religious" right in this country. picking and choosing which moral values apply to them. complete hypocrisy.
And Bush made Michael Moore rich...what do you expect...that these partisan hacks would stop talking about the very issues that are their sole source of revenue.Lets face it, Clinton made Rush rich and now that he is gone he has not stopped talking about Clinton. When will the right let go of Clinton and let there own self healing begin? So much hate!
Comparing putting to death criminal's who've committed a heinous crime and putting to death innocent life is an argument that is fodder for another thread. Even what you say you're critiquing doesn't support your entry into this thread. It's just more of the 'shoot wildly in the general direction" kind of stuff. Again, broad sweeping generalizations.Originally posted by: Sudheer Anne
i am critiquing and calling out those who are in favor of the death penalty, but are vehemently opposed to abortion. those who support the Iraq War and could care less for the losses of Iraqi lives, but cry foul when an unborn child is aborted. these are the hyprocrites of this country.
True. It seems the liberals are the ones trotting out threads in here that quote Rush and are the ones listening to him. It's an odd kind of irony.Originally posted by: slyedog
i dont like rush and never listen to him. seems like the libs hate him but always listens to him. doing exactly what he wants them to do.
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
True. It seems the liberals are the ones trotting out threads in here that quote Rush and are the ones listening to him. It's an odd kind of irony.Originally posted by: slyedog
i dont like rush and never listen to him. seems like the libs hate him but always listens to him. doing exactly what he wants them to do.
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
True. It seems the liberals are the ones trotting out threads in here that quote Rush and are the ones listening to him. It's an odd kind of irony.Originally posted by: slyedog
i dont like rush and never listen to him. seems like the libs hate him but always listens to him. doing exactly what he wants them to do.
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
Rush is rich. Duh. He got that way by finding a group of people he could stir up and get to listen to him. These folks have certain things they want to hear, and he fills their need. In other words, he's found a viable market to sell his wares. He's making a mint and effectively being paid to say what he does.
Just like Al Franken, right?
The Rush supporters want to hear bad things about the left, and good things about the right, or at least about the current administration. So he hits on Clinton, Kennedy, and others because they are most visible, and in truth Kennedy is pretty slimey, much more than Clinton. Consequently he will always do what he does. Make money, and that is by saying things, and as Pabster demonstrates people will buy it at truth, in spite of the fact that many of his fallacies are so easily shown up as deception. He's not there to sell truth, but to sell what Pabster wants to hear.
He's an entertainer, and I often find him amusing. Rush too![]()
I hate to bust your balls but I haven't listened to Rush for YEARS. I just find it amusing that he stirs up the liberals so much.![]()
Yeah, he's worth every penny!
Originally posted by: ysperalda
Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Michael Savage (phony name btw) are the reasons why political talk radio is sh1t.
Originally posted by: cwjerome
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: cKGunslinger
I think "mediocre" would be quite a stretch for the current Oval Office resident, don't you?
I think it would be a charitable description, assuming that's what you're implying. GHWB was mediocre; GWB is considerably below that level IMO.
I think it's safe to say that GHWB was mediocre... as was Clinton, although he resided over pretty good times overall. He might be seen like a 20s president, roaring times, yet doing nothing to stem the tide of problems.
Dubya however, encountered serious, historical situations... and his actions will take years to decipher. His legacy is wide open IMO.
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: ysperalda
Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Michael Savage (phony name btw) are the reasons why political talk radio is sh1t.
Yeah, we should all tune to Air America Radio for our daily dose of political discussion <sigh>
