- Oct 13, 1999
- 22,377
- 7
- 81
UPDATE #5 3/26
I'm wondering if the "crappy" Opteron has a faulty memory controller. Got in some Corsair XMS 2GB kit and it was working fine for a few hours, now one stick is dead. Mobo just beeps with it installed. I had it the whole time on the "crappy" Opteron at completely default speeds just to make sure the CPU was good at rated speed. My Geil RAM was exhibiting that strangeness with the "crappy" Opteron but is happy now with one of the other chips. However, one stick of the Corsair RAM is now dead. Tested using other Opteron in other motherboard and "beeeep."
UPDATE #4 3/17
1) Some people are getting too worked up over my "accusation" of Monarch.
2) I renamed the message title again.
3) My inquiry regarding whether the CPUs I've gotten from Monarch were used was prompted by the IHS looking different than I have seen previously and have nothing to do with how well or not well the cores themselves overclock. If I had posted "I'm building a workstation and am using a Tyan board" then perhaps people wouldn't be so quick to accuse me of being unhappy about getting bad overclockers, when indeed I had posted about the second core before I even put the chip in a motherboard for the first time.
4) At least nobody has said, "how did a retard like you become Elite" like they're fond of doing in Off Topic. :roll:
5) Also, at least math and spelling Nazis haven't shown up. When a thread dissolves into "OMG you left out an apostrophe... you suxor ..."
UPDATE #3 3/16
The two CPUs I received today (one looking new, one looking lapped) will pass Prime (just a few minutes) at 2.7GHz. Re-tested my original CPU will not even boot off disc at 2.7GHz and will fail Prime immediately at 2.4GHz. Basically I set up the new looking CPU, let it run Prime for a while, came back and saw that it was still passing, shut off system, popped in second "lapped" CPU I received today, booted up at same settings and ran Prime for a while, came back and it was still running, shut off, swapped to my original "lapped" CPU, turned on and it won't boot onto disc. Dropped multiplier to 8X and it boots fine and runs Memtest fine, but Prime fails on very first test.
Basically I was right in my assessment of the original CPU, that it overclocked like crap.
Something else I noticed is that this board doesn't like my OCZ memory at certain memory multipliers.
UPDATE #2 3/16
Decided to change the name of this thread.
I believe that two of the three Opteron 144 CPUs I've purchased as new from Monarch Computer have been previously used.
I looked at my original Opteron 144 from Monarch and it also looks like it was lapped. I had ordered it with a motherboard as an OEM CPU but had told them to NOT test it together, however when I received it I found out it was installed on the board with a Thermaltake Venus HSF already mounted on it. Well, after receiving the suspicious CPU earlier today, I cleaned the paste off the original Opteron and found out that it also looks like it was lapped.
My original CPU
First CPU received today
Second CPU received today
The pictures are from laying the CPUs on my scanner. Looking at the pics of the first two CPUs, the IHS looks lapped with some rounded corners and the texture is really smooth. The third picture (labeled "Second CPU received today") shows nice sharp edges on the corners of the core and more texture on the IHS surface. Unless someone has a good explanation as to why I've suddenly found two IHS that look like no other, my only conclusion is that Monarch Computer sold me two used Opterons as new.
UPDATE 3/16
Well, I got in my two new Opteron 144 chips from Monarch a few minutes ago. Just opened up the box and haven't tried them out yet, but... it looks like one of the CPUs have been used. Now, I've never tried "lapping" an IHS, but this one looks lapped to me.
I've seen literally hundreds of CPUs with IHS over the years (previously working at a computer repair shop) and I've never seen one like this. The corners are rounded and the sharp edges are softened a bit. Often the IHS leaves a rounded square "cut" on the bottom of heatsinks because they are so sharp and not quite flat, but this chip's IHS is totally different. So, anyone who's lapped their IHS, please look at the picture linked above and tell me... does that look like a lapped IHS?
I've previously purchased three OEM CPUs from Monarch. The Sempron and A64 3200+ were AFAIK new. My first Opteron 144 (the subject of most of this thread) was mounted in the board I ordered with it and so I couldn't tell if it was "virgin" or not, but it did have bent pins whether due to mishandling or whatever. Now, these two OEM Opteron 144 chips... one looks brand new but the second one is what has me worried.
I was planning to test the chips later today, hopefully get some feedback on this issue by then.
------------------------------------ original post ------------------------------------------
Fellow overclockers, please be generous and forgiving to a DFI n00b.
Purchased an OEM Opteron 144 and a DFI LANPARTY Ultra-D from Monarch and just got it in today. So far... terrible overclocks and it's the hottest running AMD CPU I've had in a while. Never had a DFI LANPARTY board with it's myriad of options, so perhaps I'm missing something.
Parts:
OEM Opteron 144
Thermaltake Venus 7+ HSF (free from Monarch)
DFI nF4 LANPARTY Ultra-D
2x512MB OCZ Premier CAS 2.5 PC3200 RAM with copper heatspreader
Sapphire Radeon X800GTO PCIe
Fortron "Green" FSP400-60GLN
Toshiba DVDROM
I think I have the 6/23/05 BIOS 623-3. To take other stuff out of the equation:
DRAM Frequency Set 100 (1/02)
CAS 3.0
LDT/FSB Frequency Ratio X 2.5
CPU VID Control 1.40 V (or Auto)
LDT Voltage Control 1.40 V
Chip Set Voltage Control 1.70 V
DRAM Voltage Control 2.80 V
everything else in BIOS is default
The stability test is running Prime from UBCD for a few minutes. I'll worry about long term stability later, just want a quick check on what's definately not stable.
With CPU/FSB Frequency Ratio set to X 9.0 (default on this Opteron) and testing FSB/HTT in 5MHz increments, maximum of 250MHz, or 2250MHz core speed. At 255Mhz Prime craps out immediately.
Lowering the CPU/FSB Frequency Ratio to X 7.0, FSB/HTT can be set to 300MHz (with all the same other settings as listed above) and Prime runs happily with the CPU at 2100MHz.
With the CPU/FSB Frequency Ratio set to X 8.0 and FSB/HTT still set at 300MHz (and all other settings as above) so that the CPU runs at 2400MHz, Prime craps out immediately.
At 8X ratio with HTT 280MHz for 2240MHz core speed, Prime runs fine.
At 8X ratio with HTT 290MHz for 2320MHz core speed, Prime fails immediately. With these settings I started boosting the vcore in 0.025v increments. 1.475v and it became Prime stable. 1.425v and 1.450v Prime failed immediately. With vcore at 1.475v, raised HTT to 300MHz for 2400MHz core and Prime fails immediately. Raising ratio to default 9X just to see what happens, and at 2700MHz it cannot even boot from disc - spontaneously reboots after "Building DMI Pool....."
I'm having such a terrible time with this that soon I'm gonna be running back to embrace my socket 754 Semprons that clock sky high with complete ease (one hit 2.7GHz).
My wife's gonna be gone the rest of the week starting tomorrow so I'll probably "borrow" her computer with the Abit KN8 board for a second opinion on this CPU.
Perhaps I need to sacrifice a chicken to the overclocking gods?
I'm wondering if the "crappy" Opteron has a faulty memory controller. Got in some Corsair XMS 2GB kit and it was working fine for a few hours, now one stick is dead. Mobo just beeps with it installed. I had it the whole time on the "crappy" Opteron at completely default speeds just to make sure the CPU was good at rated speed. My Geil RAM was exhibiting that strangeness with the "crappy" Opteron but is happy now with one of the other chips. However, one stick of the Corsair RAM is now dead. Tested using other Opteron in other motherboard and "beeeep."
UPDATE #4 3/17
1) Some people are getting too worked up over my "accusation" of Monarch.
2) I renamed the message title again.
3) My inquiry regarding whether the CPUs I've gotten from Monarch were used was prompted by the IHS looking different than I have seen previously and have nothing to do with how well or not well the cores themselves overclock. If I had posted "I'm building a workstation and am using a Tyan board" then perhaps people wouldn't be so quick to accuse me of being unhappy about getting bad overclockers, when indeed I had posted about the second core before I even put the chip in a motherboard for the first time.
4) At least nobody has said, "how did a retard like you become Elite" like they're fond of doing in Off Topic. :roll:
5) Also, at least math and spelling Nazis haven't shown up. When a thread dissolves into "OMG you left out an apostrophe... you suxor ..."
UPDATE #3 3/16
The two CPUs I received today (one looking new, one looking lapped) will pass Prime (just a few minutes) at 2.7GHz. Re-tested my original CPU will not even boot off disc at 2.7GHz and will fail Prime immediately at 2.4GHz. Basically I set up the new looking CPU, let it run Prime for a while, came back and saw that it was still passing, shut off system, popped in second "lapped" CPU I received today, booted up at same settings and ran Prime for a while, came back and it was still running, shut off, swapped to my original "lapped" CPU, turned on and it won't boot onto disc. Dropped multiplier to 8X and it boots fine and runs Memtest fine, but Prime fails on very first test.
Basically I was right in my assessment of the original CPU, that it overclocked like crap.
Something else I noticed is that this board doesn't like my OCZ memory at certain memory multipliers.
UPDATE #2 3/16
Decided to change the name of this thread.
I believe that two of the three Opteron 144 CPUs I've purchased as new from Monarch Computer have been previously used.
I looked at my original Opteron 144 from Monarch and it also looks like it was lapped. I had ordered it with a motherboard as an OEM CPU but had told them to NOT test it together, however when I received it I found out it was installed on the board with a Thermaltake Venus HSF already mounted on it. Well, after receiving the suspicious CPU earlier today, I cleaned the paste off the original Opteron and found out that it also looks like it was lapped.
My original CPU
First CPU received today
Second CPU received today
The pictures are from laying the CPUs on my scanner. Looking at the pics of the first two CPUs, the IHS looks lapped with some rounded corners and the texture is really smooth. The third picture (labeled "Second CPU received today") shows nice sharp edges on the corners of the core and more texture on the IHS surface. Unless someone has a good explanation as to why I've suddenly found two IHS that look like no other, my only conclusion is that Monarch Computer sold me two used Opterons as new.
UPDATE 3/16
Well, I got in my two new Opteron 144 chips from Monarch a few minutes ago. Just opened up the box and haven't tried them out yet, but... it looks like one of the CPUs have been used. Now, I've never tried "lapping" an IHS, but this one looks lapped to me.
I've seen literally hundreds of CPUs with IHS over the years (previously working at a computer repair shop) and I've never seen one like this. The corners are rounded and the sharp edges are softened a bit. Often the IHS leaves a rounded square "cut" on the bottom of heatsinks because they are so sharp and not quite flat, but this chip's IHS is totally different. So, anyone who's lapped their IHS, please look at the picture linked above and tell me... does that look like a lapped IHS?
I've previously purchased three OEM CPUs from Monarch. The Sempron and A64 3200+ were AFAIK new. My first Opteron 144 (the subject of most of this thread) was mounted in the board I ordered with it and so I couldn't tell if it was "virgin" or not, but it did have bent pins whether due to mishandling or whatever. Now, these two OEM Opteron 144 chips... one looks brand new but the second one is what has me worried.
I was planning to test the chips later today, hopefully get some feedback on this issue by then.
------------------------------------ original post ------------------------------------------
Fellow overclockers, please be generous and forgiving to a DFI n00b.
Purchased an OEM Opteron 144 and a DFI LANPARTY Ultra-D from Monarch and just got it in today. So far... terrible overclocks and it's the hottest running AMD CPU I've had in a while. Never had a DFI LANPARTY board with it's myriad of options, so perhaps I'm missing something.
Parts:
OEM Opteron 144
Thermaltake Venus 7+ HSF (free from Monarch)
DFI nF4 LANPARTY Ultra-D
2x512MB OCZ Premier CAS 2.5 PC3200 RAM with copper heatspreader
Sapphire Radeon X800GTO PCIe
Fortron "Green" FSP400-60GLN
Toshiba DVDROM
I think I have the 6/23/05 BIOS 623-3. To take other stuff out of the equation:
DRAM Frequency Set 100 (1/02)
CAS 3.0
LDT/FSB Frequency Ratio X 2.5
CPU VID Control 1.40 V (or Auto)
LDT Voltage Control 1.40 V
Chip Set Voltage Control 1.70 V
DRAM Voltage Control 2.80 V
everything else in BIOS is default
The stability test is running Prime from UBCD for a few minutes. I'll worry about long term stability later, just want a quick check on what's definately not stable.
With CPU/FSB Frequency Ratio set to X 9.0 (default on this Opteron) and testing FSB/HTT in 5MHz increments, maximum of 250MHz, or 2250MHz core speed. At 255Mhz Prime craps out immediately.
Lowering the CPU/FSB Frequency Ratio to X 7.0, FSB/HTT can be set to 300MHz (with all the same other settings as listed above) and Prime runs happily with the CPU at 2100MHz.
With the CPU/FSB Frequency Ratio set to X 8.0 and FSB/HTT still set at 300MHz (and all other settings as above) so that the CPU runs at 2400MHz, Prime craps out immediately.
At 8X ratio with HTT 280MHz for 2240MHz core speed, Prime runs fine.
At 8X ratio with HTT 290MHz for 2320MHz core speed, Prime fails immediately. With these settings I started boosting the vcore in 0.025v increments. 1.475v and it became Prime stable. 1.425v and 1.450v Prime failed immediately. With vcore at 1.475v, raised HTT to 300MHz for 2400MHz core and Prime fails immediately. Raising ratio to default 9X just to see what happens, and at 2700MHz it cannot even boot from disc - spontaneously reboots after "Building DMI Pool....."
I'm having such a terrible time with this that soon I'm gonna be running back to embrace my socket 754 Semprons that clock sky high with complete ease (one hit 2.7GHz).
My wife's gonna be gone the rest of the week starting tomorrow so I'll probably "borrow" her computer with the Abit KN8 board for a second opinion on this CPU.
Perhaps I need to sacrifice a chicken to the overclocking gods?