Grooveriding
Diamond Member
- Dec 25, 2008
- 9,147
- 1,330
- 126
It also matched the 5870 in Metro 2033. Even the Anandtech review showed what, about an 8% difference in performance overall at 1920 x 1200. I doubt anyone could even distinguish that.
http://www.techreport.com/articles.x/19242/10
"The Fermi-based GPUs have the advantage here, so much so that the GTX 460 1GB essentially matches the Radeon HD 5870."
No one is concerned with how these cards perform in older games (they all perform fine). It's how they perform in newer games that's important.
http://images.hardwarecanucks.com/image//skymtl/GPU/GTX-460/GTX-460-31.jpg
http://images.hardwarecanucks.com/image//skymtl/GPU/GTX-460/GTX-460-73.jpg
Plus better visuals in newer games like Just Cause 2, Metro 2033, Mafia II, etc. Features ATI can't currently compete with.
This is nonsense. The 460 lacks the power to deliver playable frames in Metro 2033 on settings that display that games potential.
Normal settings in that game look nothing like high or very high, and that benchmark is skewed because Metro is an nvidia sponsored title and performs better on that hardware. Compare the 460 to the 5870 on high or very high without AA. Let us know.
Better visuals in Just Cause 2 ? More nonsense. I went from ATI to nvidia and noticed nothing in that game, beyond having to literally, quite literally, stop actually playing the game, find some water, walk up to it, look closely, and go.. ah.. more waves.
A game's release date holds no bearing on its demands from a GPU, Crysis can attest to that, released in 2007, still is about the most demanding game out there.
Better off not offering back seat opinions, or parroting nvidia news releases when you have no actual basis to offer any sort of informed opinion. Given your track record on claims of gpu performance proving false in these forums, better to abstain altogether.
Last edited:
