The logic behind this was presented to me like this:
More RAM leads to less paging and subsequenytly less thrashing of the HDD. Hence less wear and tear.
Makes sense logically, but I doubt the reduced disk access would have a measurable benefit on the drives lifespan.
Opinions?
More RAM leads to less paging and subsequenytly less thrashing of the HDD. Hence less wear and tear.
Makes sense logically, but I doubt the reduced disk access would have a measurable benefit on the drives lifespan.
Opinions?