thanks for the credit frustrateduser. If it wins hopefully we can agree on where to go in the concierge's private jet.
as for the scale of our OP in the photo: relative to the female on the right of the photograph - I think if you look closer you will notice that her legs don't end where her pants stop. A good bit of her leg extends out (capri pants) and you can see a sliver of her shoe to the left of the very foreground female's tricep. This makes her about 20% taller than our OP and judging by her face and build is not likely as tall as OP.
For scale (and focal point) I was using the heavy set gentleman in the blue in the center of the photographers gallery. He is about 5 feet in front of the position of OP and certainly taller (although OP never provided his height we presume he is in the 5"-8" range) and considering that, OP is sized correctly.
I do agree with the criticism that the OPs left hand is fishy looking, but again, if the tagline graphic in the news anchor image fooled our target last time I think this little shortcoming with slip right under the radar.
Since photo manipulation can become a bottomless pit of tweaking and second guessing, I intended to give it one pass, and thats that.
Thanks for everyone's good feedback.