Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: charrison
IF California was the most desirable place to live, it would not be losing population. California could possibly lose house seats after the next census.
California is not losing population, it may lose a house seat after the next census because its population is growing more slowly than the national average. Property values in CA, even after any housing correction will remain among the highest in the nation, and for a good reason. A lot of people want to live here.
Yes people want to live there, but people do appear to finding places better to live than California.
Not so much. They do find cheaper places.
But let's try charrison's logic: if Beverly Hills were desirable, it wouldn't be losing people.
Couldn't possibly have anything to do with, say, being highly desirable, but factors from the economy to other places becoming increasingly more affordable.
FWIW, the top parts of the CA Bay Area are among the softer hit in the real estate crash. It's the highly Republican, inland, poorer areas that are hardest hit.
