California Trump supporter harassed in his own apartment complex

[jammix]

This guy have the patience of a Monk. I applaud him for that.
What dont people get... a wall is for illegals.. not for races.. obey the law and no one has to worry about it.. if canada didnt protect their own boarder and actually secure and protect and obey their own laws, then we would build a wall across canada too.
Welcome to America where you can be harassed by illegals that can barley speak english...

 

[fskimospy]

Truly they can 'barley' speak English. Lol.

Another self ownage thread.

 

[jammix]

Truly they can 'barley' speak English. Lol.

Another self ownage thread.

I wasn't talking specifically about her...

 

[master_shake_]

all that to try and get a reaction so they can claim to be the victim.

priceless.

 

[umbrella39]

Typical WJW victim...

 

[Lash444]

Take a thousand Trump supporters and give a guy a Bernie sign to walk through the crowd, and someone is bound to punch him in the face.
Take a thousand Bernie supporters and give a guy a Trump sign to walk through the crowd, and someone is bound to punch him in the face.

Nothing to see here. Mobs just diffuse responsibility, so people are more likely to do stupid things in taht situation. Hell, people are willing to stampede over fellow human beings to save $15 on a Black Friday.

That said, I am sure the response will be that it is the left that claims that it is the party of tolerance. And you are right. They do tend to be more tolerant. Superman is lawful good, but he still fights evil. Being "tolerant" doesn't mean that you accept intolerance.

 

[Commodus]

But let's not talk about the men who shouted "Donald Trump" while attacking a Muslim woman, or the hundreds of of other incidents of racism and Islamophobia directly spurred on by Trump's election. Let's not talk about how Trump's attempts to discourage this have amounted to a token, halfhearted "stop it" in an interview, and how there are millions of non-white, non-straight, non-Christian people who are genuinely afraid of the hatred unleashed by Trump's election win. No, sir, it's all those darn liberals' fault.

I'm not excusing those incidents, but it's hilarious to see you cherry-pick a few clips and try to take the moral high ground when you don't really have ground to stand on.

Also, if you hadn't noticed, racism is more complicated than simply shouting "I hate [insert racial slur here]" and directly banning people based on race. It's passive-aggressive moves like making anti-immigrant policies a centerpiece of your campaign platform, especially when they primarily target non-white people and aren't at all refined (all 1.7 billion Muslims outside the US can't enter? Really?). It's conflating black people with inner cities in a debate, as if black people don't exist anywhere else. It's taking on the head of a virulently racist and homophobic "news" outlet as a key advisor and yet claiming that you wouldn't have hired him unless you thought he was innocent of those claims. It's refusing to condemn the KKK or have a change of heart when it enthusiastically endorses your platform.

 

[buckshot24]

But let's not talk about the men who shouted "Donald Trump" while attacking a Muslim woman, or the hundreds of of other incidents of racism and Islamophobia directly spurred on by Trump's election. Let's not talk about how Trump's attempts to discourage this have amounted to a token, halfhearted "stop it" in an interview, and how there are millions of non-white, non-straight, non-Christian people who are genuinely afraid of the hatred unleashed by Trump's election win. No, sir, it's all those darn liberals' fault.

I'm not excusing those incidents, but it's hilarious to see you cherry-pick a few clips and try to take the moral high ground when you don't really have ground to stand on.

Also, if you hadn't noticed, racism is more complicated than simply shouting "I hate [insert racial slur here]" and directly banning people based on race. It's passive-aggressive moves like making anti-immigrant policies a centerpiece of your campaign platform, especially when they primarily target non-white people and aren't at all refined (all 1.7 billion Muslims outside the US can't enter? Really?). It's conflating black people with inner cities in a debate, as if black people don't exist anywhere else. It's taking on the head of a virulently racist and homophobic "news" outlet as a key advisor and yet claiming that you wouldn't have hired him unless you thought he was innocent of those claims. It's refusing to condemn the KKK or have a change of heart when it enthusiastically endorses your platform.

Where do you get your numbers from in the bolded part? Breitbart isn't "virulently racist and homophobic". Who is banning people based on race? Why should people come through our borders illegally? What is racist about protecting our border?

The meltdown here is epic.

 

[fskimospy]

But let's not talk about the men who shouted "Donald Trump" while attacking a Muslim woman, or the hundreds of of other incidents of racism and Islamophobia directly spurred on by Trump's election. Let's not talk about how Trump's attempts to discourage this have amounted to a token, halfhearted "stop it" in an interview, and how there are millions of non-white, non-straight, non-Christian people who are genuinely afraid of the hatred unleashed by Trump's election win. No, sir, it's all those darn liberals' fault.

I'm not excusing those incidents, but it's hilarious to see you cherry-pick a few clips and try to take the moral high ground when you don't really have ground to stand on.

Also, if you hadn't noticed, racism is more complicated than simply shouting "I hate [insert racial slur here]" and directly banning people based on race. It's passive-aggressive moves like making anti-immigrant policies a centerpiece of your campaign platform, especially when they primarily target non-white people and aren't at all refined (all 1.7 billion Muslims outside the US can't enter? Really?). It's conflating black people with inner cities in a debate, as if black people don't exist anywhere else. It's taking on the head of a virulently racist and homophobic "news" outlet as a key advisor and yet claiming that you wouldn't have hired him unless you thought he was innocent of those claims. It's refusing to condemn the KKK or have a change of heart when it enthusiastically endorses your platform.

It's interesting that even when conservatives control the entire federal government they are STILL trying to convince everyone that they are victims.

One of the basic tenets of modern American conservatism is that they are endless victims. Even when they win they are terribly oppressed.

 

[Commodus]

Where do you get your numbers from in the bolded part? Breitbart isn't "virulently racist and homophobic". Who is banning people based on race? Why should people come through our borders illegally? What is racist about protecting our border?

The meltdown here is epic.

The Southern Poverty Law Center had reports of over 400 incidents as of mid-November.

Breitbart is racist and homophobic (and sexist, I'd add). This isn't up for dispute, sorry. Here are 10 of its worst headlines as a sample. Yes, that's a handful of many more articles, but no respectable news source should have even one of those on its site. That Bannon allowed these speaks volumes.

 

[Starbuck1975]

Take a thousand Trump supporters and give a guy a Bernie sign to walk through the crowd, and someone is bound to punch him in the face.
Take a thousand Bernie supporters and give a guy a Trump sign to walk through the crowd, and someone is bound to punch him in the face.

Nothing to see here. Mobs just diffuse responsibility, so people are more likely to do stupid things in taht situation. Hell, people are willing to stampede over fellow human beings to save $15 on a Black Friday.

That said, I am sure the response will be that it is the left that claims that it is the party of tolerance. And you are right. They do tend to be more tolerant. Superman is lawful good, but he still fights evil. Being "tolerant" doesn't mean that you accept intolerance.

Reeves superman or whiny bitch collatoral damage neck snapping superman?

 

[BonzaiDuck]

Take a thousand Trump supporters and give a guy a Bernie sign to walk through the crowd, and someone is bound to punch him in the face.
Take a thousand Bernie supporters and give a guy a Trump sign to walk through the crowd, and someone is bound to punch him in the face.

Nothing to see here. Mobs just diffuse responsibility, so people are more likely to do stupid things in taht situation. Hell, people are willing to stampede over fellow human beings to save $15 on a Black Friday.

That said, I am sure the response will be that it is the left that claims that it is the party of tolerance. And you are right. They do tend to be more tolerant. Superman is lawful good, but he still fights evil. Being "tolerant" doesn't mean that you accept intolerance.

After another 4 or 5 hours of the morning news with three sources blaring at me, I'm of a mood to ask this question.

How much time or attention should I give to a thread started with boarderline spelling skills? I think for lunch I'll have some barely soup.

Of course, Lee Harvey Oswald wasn't semi-literate as Gerald Ford suggested. An analysis of his work concludes that he was dyslexic, variously proven or asserted to be bi-lingual or tri-lingual.

But only I can answer my own question, unless someone has their own observation to make.

 

[buckshot24]

The Southern Poverty Law Center had reports of over 400 incidents as of mid-November.

Breitbart is racist and homophobic (and sexist, I'd add). This isn't up for dispute, sorry. Here are 10 of its worst headlines as a sample. Yes, that's a handful of many more articles, but no respectable news source should have even one of those on its site. That Bannon allowed these speaks volumes.

Sorry but those things are very much up for dispute. None of those titles have anything to do with racism, the Jew who wrote "renegade Jew" must be an antisemite? You can't seriously think this is enough evidence to call the site "racist" and "homophobic", can you?

I wonder if you'd think Jhhnn is racist, I found quotes of him calling Clarence Thomas a "house N-word". Much more blatant than anything found on Breitbart.

They aren't a "respectable news source" either. They are clearly an advocacy outlet pushing an agenda and posts lots of opinion pieces.

It has been "reported" that 3 million illegal aliens have voted too, does that mean it happened? Being reported and actually happening aren't the same thing. Selective skepticism?

 

[Moonbeam]

It's interesting that even when conservatives control the entire federal government they are STILL trying to convince everyone that they are victims.

One of the basic tenets of modern American conservatism is that they are endless victims. Even when they win they are terribly oppressed.

You approach truth when paradox is revealed. Consider this:

Conservatives play the victim because they hate victims. (You can see that they do.) They hate victims because they are the victims that have suffered Stockholm Syndrome in childhood. They keeled over to the demands of conformity. They found no other way to escape their suffering. They are the new tortures of today. They create what they fear endlessly because they are not awake to their own reality. They can't face their pain so they hurt others..

 

[JSt0rm]

the guy handled it pretty well.

 

[imported_tajmahal]

This guy have the patience of a Monk. I applaud him for that.
What dont people get... a wall is for illegals.. not for races.. obey the law and no one has to worry about it.. if canada didnt protect their own boarder and actually secure and protect and obey their own laws, then we would build a wall across canada too.
Welcome to America where you can be harassed by illegals that can barley speak english...

There is no surprise that violence is being used against conservatives and Republicans, it's obvious in real life and obvious in the approbation they get here in these forums. The left consider violence a perfectly acceptable tactic when it's used against their opponents. "The ends justifies the means" to Democrats.

 

[theeedude]

Trump supporters are so trashy.

 

[imported_tajmahal]

You approach truth when paradox is revealed. Consider this:

Conservatives play the victim because they hate victims. (You can see that they do.) They hate victims because they are the victims that have suffered Stockholm Syndrome in childhood. They keeled over to the demands of conformity. They found no other way to escape their suffering. They are the new tortures of today. They create what they fear endlessly because they are not awake to their own reality. They can't face their pain so they hurt others..

It certainly looks like you also blame women when they get raped. Do you use this tactic on other victims of violence or just conservative ones?

 

[HamburgerBoy]

But let's not talk about the men who shouted "Donald Trump" while attacking a Muslim woman, or the hundreds of of other incidents of racism and Islamophobia directly spurred on by Trump's election.

Convenient that all the first-hand evidence of this story comes from the alleged victim.

 

[imported_tajmahal]

http://www.fakehatecrimes.org/
http://reason.com/blog/2016/11/18/election-hate-crimes-hoaxes-hyperbole
"This isn't helped by groups like the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which states that more than 400 hate crimes have been committed in America post-election. But the vast majority of the examples SPLC gives involve incidents like one elementary student telling another that he would be deported, or a white woman laughing at a black woman who overheard her saying racist things, or a man in a car yelling "i love you" as he drove by a gay couple—things that may be intolerant, unkind, and legitimately scary for those targeted, but not what most people would conjure when they hear "hate crimes" or "hateful extremism." And pointing that out doesn't equate to condoning these acts, or dismissing the hurt and fear they inspire in people. It is simply an attempt to separate what is really happening in America right now from what is hyperbole, hysteria, or hoax.""

 

[Tequila]

the guy handled it pretty well.

Agreed, I would have lost it 2 minutes with the guy and girl annoying the shit outta that patient guy. That guy saying the F word every 20 seconds is a pretty typical California liberal. I'm a centrist and sometimes lean left and sometimes right. If a Kalifornia liberal doesn't agree with you they just say fuck you over and over. Can't wait to move out of California next year.

 

[JSt0rm]

I'm a California liberal and I would never approach someone for that. Hell I bet there are a bunch of hipsters in silver lake wearing trump stuff ironically.

 

[Jhhnn]

I wonder if you'd think Jhhnn is racist, I found quotes of him calling Clarence Thomas a "house N-word". Much more blatant than anything found on Breitbart.

Link that up for everybody.

I'd appreciate it if other thread participants would make the same demand.

He has me on ignore & is then chickenshit enough to call me out, repeatedly.

 

[JSt0rm]

Buckshit... give us the links.

 

[buckshot24]

Buckshit... give us the links.

For what?