Geosurface
Diamond Member
The test is simple: can the school demonstrate that whatever it is that they banned has caused significant disruption? If yes, then they can ban it.
No disruption = can't ban.
And the voice of reason goes ignored... :whiste:
I don't think anyone's denying that there is legal precedent for this sort of ruling. I think what we're saying is that this is an extremely worrying precedent and a snowball that needs to be stopped from rolling further.
Because under this "does it cause disruption" model, let's consider some things which would be completely possible:
School demographics shift to majority or large portion Muslim, and eventually, emboldened by this fact, a significant portion of the male Muslim students start being disruptive and agitating over the issue of the school being coed. School moves to become male only, and insists that the nearby school which is being made female only is a great facility too. Mother of female student brings case to court, saying "this is BS my daughter is established at this school, this is the United States, girls have attended this school for decades, in fact I myself attended that school as a girl."
Court says "too bad, the school has convincingly demonstrated that continuing to be coed will cause significant disruption."
I won't belabor the point, but couldn't Christian fundamentalists who achieved large enough numbers at a school start creating a significant disruption over the school allowing an LGBT club? Or letting a gay student wear a rainbow t-shirt? etc?
Couldn't horrible white racists in the south have made the case, or had the case made on their behalf, of significant disruption when schools were integrated?
And if you want to say "well there are constitutional protections in place for racially and sexually integrated schools" I would just point out that there WERE such protections in place for freedom of speech too, but that didn't stop this nonsense. And frankly, I don't even think displays of our own nation's flag need to be considered as a free speech issue, it's far more basic than that.
Should the school need to take down all the American flags in classrooms and the one out in front of the school on Cinco De Mayo, too? Or am I dating myself by believing those flags are even there in the first place?
Last edited: