calculus help

Status
Not open for further replies.

roboskier

Member
Dec 12, 2008
29
0
0
If f(x)=logbX, then f(bx)=


We have really only used natural log this year, last time I used logs was a couple years ago so I'm struggling with this question haha.

thanks.
 

Howard

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
47,986
11
81
10^f(x) = bx

I'm not that good at math, so this approach might be wrong.

Do you mean log base e when you say natural log? If so, change 10 to e.

EDIT: Damn, apparently I suck at math.
 

StevenYoo

Diamond Member
Jul 4, 2001
8,628
0
0
this isn't a calc problem.

if f(x)=logbX, then f(bx) = log b(bx)

or

f(bx) = log (b^2)x
 

blinky8225

Senior member
Nov 23, 2004
564
0
0
Unless an upper-case X is different than a lower-case x, StevenYoo's answer should be correct. Although if you use the properties of logs, you can get some interesting results.

for instance... f(bx) = log((b^2)x) = log(b) + log(bx) = log(b) + f(x)
So... f(bx) = log(b) + f(x)
 

StevenYoo

Diamond Member
Jul 4, 2001
8,628
0
0
Originally posted by: blinky8225
for instance... f(bx) = log((b^2)x) = log(b) + log(bx) = log(b) + f(x)
So... f(bx) = log(b) + f(x)

OK now you're just fucking with us.
 

blinky8225

Senior member
Nov 23, 2004
564
0
0
Originally posted by: StevenYoo
Originally posted by: blinky8225
for instance... f(bx) = log((b^2)x) = log(b) + log(bx) = log(b) + f(x)
So... f(bx) = log(b) + f(x)

OK now you're just fucking with us.
:confused: How so?

Are you saying that equation is wrong or are you trying to say something else?

That equation is correct. Try plugging numbers in a calculator.
I just though that it would be interesting to show that if you should choose to multiply the original parameter by a factor "b", the new result would be the original result added to log(b).
 

Unitary

Member
Dec 7, 2006
35
1
71
Assuming logb(x) means log base b we get,

f(bx)=logb(bx)
=logb(b)+logb(x) (Product to Sum for Logs)
=1+logb(x)
=1+f(x)
 

roboskier

Member
Dec 12, 2008
29
0
0
Originally posted by: Unitary
Assuming logb(x) means log base b we get,

f(bx)=logb(bx)
=logb(b)+logb(x) (Product to Sum for Logs)
=1+logb(x)
=1+f(x)

fuck that was simple... Thanks for the help!
 

eLiu

Diamond Member
Jun 4, 2001
6,407
1
0
Originally posted by: Unitary
Assuming logb(x) means log base b we get,

f(bx)=logb(bx)
=logb(b)+logb(x) (Product to Sum for Logs)
=1+logb(x)
=1+f(x)

ding ding ding i dunno wtf the rest of you were talking about.
 

blinky8225

Senior member
Nov 23, 2004
564
0
0
Originally posted by: eLiu
Originally posted by: Unitary
Assuming logb(x) means log base b we get,

f(bx)=logb(bx)
=logb(b)+logb(x) (Product to Sum for Logs)
=1+logb(x)
=1+f(x)

ding ding ding i dunno wtf the rest of you were talking about.
Eh his notation just confused me. I didn't realize b was meant to be the base. I thought he meant log(bx).
 

roboskier

Member
Dec 12, 2008
29
0
0
Originally posted by: blinky8225
Originally posted by: eLiu
Originally posted by: Unitary
Assuming logb(x) means log base b we get,

f(bx)=logb(bx)
=logb(b)+logb(x) (Product to Sum for Logs)
=1+logb(x)
=1+f(x)

ding ding ding i dunno wtf the rest of you were talking about.
Eh his notation just confused me. I didn't realize b was meant to be the base. I thought he meant log(bx).

haha no problem, wasn't sure how to type b as the base, I guess I should have just said it...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.