- Mar 31, 2003
- 11,679
- 0
- 81
Tomorrow i have a test in AP Calculus on limits. While the first part was easy, the second part is merely tricky, not hard, just a lot of abstract stuff.
I was wondering if someone could explain how my book got the answer to a problem. I have worked for a while and cannot come up with it:
Problem: lim H->0 for [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h
I am subsituting f(x) for (4/x) in the problem.
You cannot use substitution method as it would give you indeterminate form, so there is some way to simplify it.
Additionally, i remember my teacher saying something that i had never know. Because f(x) is (4/x) that means f(h) is (4/h)?? Can someone attest to this.
Im not trying to get answers and people to do work for me (I am studying not doing HW)... i simply dont understand the problem (more specifically the answer).
Any help would be appreciated.
-Kevin
I was wondering if someone could explain how my book got the answer to a problem. I have worked for a while and cannot come up with it:
Problem: lim H->0 for [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h
I am subsituting f(x) for (4/x) in the problem.
You cannot use substitution method as it would give you indeterminate form, so there is some way to simplify it.
Additionally, i remember my teacher saying something that i had never know. Because f(x) is (4/x) that means f(h) is (4/h)?? Can someone attest to this.
Im not trying to get answers and people to do work for me (I am studying not doing HW)... i simply dont understand the problem (more specifically the answer).
Any help would be appreciated.
-Kevin