Calculus 2 Homework Problem Bugging Me

CallTheFBI

Banned
Jan 22, 2003
761
0
0
Ok, I have been working on this homework problem for awhile now. It is right here. Take a look at it first before you read on. The first two lines are the actual problem and underneath are my feeble attempts to solve it. Now in the back of the book where the answers are it just says: let u = x ^ m. Which is what I did as you can see and things aren't looking too pretty. The (e^x)/(x) integral cannot be solved by me or my TI-89 calculator and that is why I left it in that form. If you can tell me what I am doing wrong that would be great.
 

hdeck

Lifer
Sep 26, 2002
14,530
1
0
just after glancing at it...try doing intergration by parts again on the (e^x)/x...i don't know if that will help but it might. im tired
 

hdeck

Lifer
Sep 26, 2002
14,530
1
0
Originally posted by: minendo
Man I wish I was able to use calculators when I took calculus.

i just took it last semester and we couldn't use them =/
 

CallTheFBI

Banned
Jan 22, 2003
761
0
0
Originally posted by: hdeck
just after glancing at it...try doing intergration by parts again on the (e^x)/x...i don't know if that will help but it might. im tired

Tried that, just got another nasty integral of (e^x)(ln x) that neither my TI-89 nor I can solve.

 

cchen

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 1999
6,062
0
76
what the heck are you doing...

where did the e^x / x come from?
 

Shaka

Senior member
Oct 13, 1999
608
0
0
you are doing the intergration by parts incorrectly.

integrate(udv) = uv - integrate(vdu)

u = x^m
dv = e^x

using that, you get:

du = mx^(m-1)dx
v = e^x

uv = (x^m)(e^x)
integrate(vdu) = (e^x)(mx^(m-1))dx

i love integration by parts! one of my professors told me that the phrase "udv = uv - vdu" is universally known. haha
 

rgwalt

Diamond Member
Apr 22, 2000
7,393
0
0
Shaka totally got it right. You seem to have screwed up integration by parts somewhere. Don't worry, its easy to do. I'm happy to have finally seen a math problem on AT that I could do though.

R
 

RossGr

Diamond Member
Jan 11, 2000
3,383
1
0
I am not sure why you have

dv = (e^x)/x

it should simply be dv = e^x dx so v = e^x
 

CallTheFBI

Banned
Jan 22, 2003
761
0
0
OMG, this problem was 10x easier than I thought. Was looking way too deeply into the problem. All they want is for me to use the integration by parts formula to show why it equals that. I solved that problem easy but there is one that says use this formula to solve this integral. LONG problem involving a ton of algebra, finally finished though. I'll post the solution once I get it entered into my equation editor.
 

CallTheFBI

Banned
Jan 22, 2003
761
0
0
Originally posted by: RossGr
I am not sure why you have

dv = (e^x)/x

it should simply be dv = e^x dx so v = e^x

Notice how u = x^m so there is an x^(-1) left over for the dv part. It is: (x^m)(x^(-1))(e^x). See why now? Don't worry about it though, I was approaching the problem incorrectly, making it 10x harder on myself.
 

RossGr

Diamond Member
Jan 11, 2000
3,383
1
0
u = x^m


dv = e^x dx

du = m x^ (m-1) dx

v= e^x

Int (udv) = uv - Int v du

= x^m e^x - Int (e^x m x ^(m-1) dx
= x^m e^x - m Int( e^x x^(m-1) dx

There is no x^-1 floating around that I can see. You must take the u and dv from the original problem statement.
 

CallTheFBI

Banned
Jan 22, 2003
761
0
0
Originally posted by: RossGr
u = x^m


dv = e^x dx

du = m x^ (m-1) dx

v= e^x

Int (udv) = uv - Int v du

= x^m e^x - Int (e^x m x ^(m-1) dx
= x^m e^x - m Int( e^x x^(m-1) dx

There is no x^-1 floating around that I can see. You must take the u and dv from the original problem statement.

I know but silly me was trying to solve the integral on the right hand side of the equal sign. That's why.

 

CallTheFBI

Banned
Jan 22, 2003
761
0
0
Here is the solution and the other problem I was talking about that uses the formula that was derived in problem #39. Case closed, for now.