Originally posted by: NuclearFusi0n
Don't waste your money.Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
Originally posted by: Fausto
I have one of these.
It's not super-duper accurate in an absolute sense, but it's great for tracking fat loss over time. Certainly better than BMI.
Fausto - which model do you have? I've been meaning to pick one up. Is there really a large diff. b/t the $40 and the $60/80 models?
http://www.accumeasurefitness....ducts/fitness2000.html
Pick one up for <$10 on ebay, it'll be cheaper and much more accurate.
I dunno about that. Calipers are a better measure overall than those scales, yes, but not necessarily in this instance. It's tough to do a skinfold test on yourself to begin with, and beyond that, you need quite a bit of practice in order to be accurate with calipers...especially if you're going to be comparing bodyfat % measurements taken at different times.
Honestly, if you're just trying to track change over time by yourself, that scale would be a better (and easier) choice. Just have the skinfold thickness test done every few months by a personal trainer.
Edit: and no, BMI is not accurate for athletes, or very health-conscious, in-shape individuals. Even the doctors that came up with and use it will tell you that. It's just a quick way to get a ballpark estimate of where someone lies in relation to "ideal" weight for their height. But seeing as how it doesn't necessarily take individual differences in frame size into account, it's not going to be the most accurate measure, no.
