• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Cable Company Didn't Turn Off My Cable

Page 8 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Thorny
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: spidey07
Stealing cable is a federal crime. Good luck.

It's pretty clear cut. You stole cable service and they caught you.
That's bullshlt.

Stealing cable is if you go out to the box on the street and hook your house/apt. up and start using it.

Calling to cancel service, then discovering that the cable company was too slack to disconnect the service is not stealing. That responsibility falls to the cable company at that point.


Can you back that with a link?

You should do the same. I've read your view of what constitutes 'unauthorized' cable use, but it's no more valid than anyone else's here. I'd like to see a cite to a court case (at any level - federal, state, local) in which a consumer was held liable for cable use after the customer requested the cable service be discontinued. I can't imagine any judge would accept such a theory, but I'll freely admit I could be wrong. Show me.
 
Its pretty basic really. You use a service, you pay for it.

From the looks of the nifty thread however, you are arguing with some people who just want things for free. You cant win an argument with them, so you are better off letting them alone and revolving abouty the threads that actually mean something. Someday, reality will bite them, with, or without, the wisdom of intelligence.
 
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: Thorny
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: spidey07
Stealing cable is a federal crime. Good luck.

It's pretty clear cut. You stole cable service and they caught you.
That's bullshlt.

Stealing cable is if you go out to the box on the street and hook your house/apt. up and start using it.

Calling to cancel service, then discovering that the cable company was too slack to disconnect the service is not stealing. That responsibility falls to the cable company at that point.


Can you back that with a link?

You should do the same. I've read your view of what constitutes 'unauthorized' cable use, but it's no more valid than anyone else's here. I'd like to see a cite to a court case (at any level - federal, state, local) in which a consumer was held liable for cable use after the customer requested the cable service be discontinued. I can't imagine any judge would accept such a theory, but I'll freely admit I could be wrong. Show me.

I already did, its on the DOJ website. What standards do you think judges go by? I'm guessing the Dept. of JUSTICE.

 
Originally posted by: Coalfax
Its pretty basic really. You use a service, you pay for it.

From the looks of the nifty thread however, you are arguing with some people who just want things for free. You cant win an argument with them, so you are better off letting them alone and revolving abouty the threads that actually mean something. Someday, reality will bite them, with, or without, the wisdom of intelligence.

That's idiotic and overly simplistic.

Hey, look, I just gave you my opinion! You owe me $100! You can't just use a service (reading my opinion) without paying for it, even if you didn't ask for such a service. You read it, now pay up! Or are you just one of those people always trying to get things for free? Shame on you!! Where are your morals?!?!
 
Originally posted by: Thorny
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: Thorny
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: spidey07
Stealing cable is a federal crime. Good luck.

It's pretty clear cut. You stole cable service and they caught you.
That's bullshlt.

Stealing cable is if you go out to the box on the street and hook your house/apt. up and start using it.

Calling to cancel service, then discovering that the cable company was too slack to disconnect the service is not stealing. That responsibility falls to the cable company at that point.


Can you back that with a link?

You should do the same. I've read your view of what constitutes 'unauthorized' cable use, but it's no more valid than anyone else's here. I'd like to see a cite to a court case (at any level - federal, state, local) in which a consumer was held liable for cable use after the customer requested the cable service be discontinued. I can't imagine any judge would accept such a theory, but I'll freely admit I could be wrong. Show me.

I already did, its on the DOJ website. What standards do you think judges go by? I'm guessing the Dept. of JUSTICE.

Oh please. There's not a single court cite on that page. You're confusing your interpretation of a law with the actual text of a law, which is generally open to debate. I asked you to show me a single court case in which a judge accepted your interpretation, that use of cable after a customer canceled the service constitutes cable theft, and you have not done so. What law school did you attend, anyway?
 
Just sue the cable company for them pumping an illegal signal into your house after you told them to turn it off.
 
Originally posted by: Thorny
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: Thorny
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: spidey07
Stealing cable is a federal crime. Good luck.

It's pretty clear cut. You stole cable service and they caught you.
That's bullshlt.

Stealing cable is if you go out to the box on the street and hook your house/apt. up and start using it.

Calling to cancel service, then discovering that the cable company was too slack to disconnect the service is not stealing. That responsibility falls to the cable company at that point.


Can you back that with a link?

You should do the same. I've read your view of what constitutes 'unauthorized' cable use, but it's no more valid than anyone else's here. I'd like to see a cite to a court case (at any level - federal, state, local) in which a consumer was held liable for cable use after the customer requested the cable service be discontinued. I can't imagine any judge would accept such a theory, but I'll freely admit I could be wrong. Show me.

I already did, its on the DOJ website. What standards do you think judges go by? I'm guessing the Dept. of JUSTICE.

You realize you're saying that during the period of time between when anyone cancels their cable service and the cable company disconnecting the line, it is illegal for that person to... live in his residence? Are you serious? Gimme your address so I can send you something and then call the cops on you saying you stole it from me. Using your logic, you'd go to jail for 6 months and be fined $1000.
 
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: Thorny
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: Thorny
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: spidey07
Stealing cable is a federal crime. Good luck.

It's pretty clear cut. You stole cable service and they caught you.
That's bullshlt.

Stealing cable is if you go out to the box on the street and hook your house/apt. up and start using it.

Calling to cancel service, then discovering that the cable company was too slack to disconnect the service is not stealing. That responsibility falls to the cable company at that point.


Can you back that with a link?

You should do the same. I've read your view of what constitutes 'unauthorized' cable use, but it's no more valid than anyone else's here. I'd like to see a cite to a court case (at any level - federal, state, local) in which a consumer was held liable for cable use after the customer requested the cable service be discontinued. I can't imagine any judge would accept such a theory, but I'll freely admit I could be wrong. Show me.

I already did, its on the DOJ website. What standards do you think judges go by? I'm guessing the Dept. of JUSTICE.

Oh please. There's not a single court cite on that page. You're confusing your interpretation of a law with the actual text of a law, which is generally open to debate. I asked you to show me a single court case in which a judge accepted your interpretation, that use of cable after a customer canceled the service constitutes cable theft, and you have not done so. What law school did you attend, anyway?


Any site that would be able to provide an actual court doc will charge a subscription to use it. The law is open to the judges interpretation, and they will interperet a years free service as stealing and award money to the cable company. My major wasn't law, it was telecommunicatons 🙂

I think the burden of proof is on you at this time, I provided links to the law, and the fact that the OP was charged puts the ball in your court.
 
Originally posted by: 2Xtreme21
Originally posted by: Thorny
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: Thorny
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: spidey07
Stealing cable is a federal crime. Good luck.

It's pretty clear cut. You stole cable service and they caught you.
That's bullshlt.

Stealing cable is if you go out to the box on the street and hook your house/apt. up and start using it.

Calling to cancel service, then discovering that the cable company was too slack to disconnect the service is not stealing. That responsibility falls to the cable company at that point.


Can you back that with a link?

You should do the same. I've read your view of what constitutes 'unauthorized' cable use, but it's no more valid than anyone else's here. I'd like to see a cite to a court case (at any level - federal, state, local) in which a consumer was held liable for cable use after the customer requested the cable service be discontinued. I can't imagine any judge would accept such a theory, but I'll freely admit I could be wrong. Show me.

I already did, its on the DOJ website. What standards do you think judges go by? I'm guessing the Dept. of JUSTICE.

You realize you're saying that during the period of time between when anyone cancels their cable service and the cable company disconnecting the line, it is illegal for that person to... live in his residence? Are you serious? Gimme your address so I can send you something and then call the cops on you saying you stole it from me. Using your logic, you'd go to jail for 6 months and be fined $1000.


The law only applies to cable, jackass. And disconnecting the line yourself provides protection for the homeowner. The OP ADMITTED using the service, he should pay.
 
:thumbsup:
Originally posted by: MX2times
I bet Adelphia is going to try and pull this crap with me. I told them 2 weeks ago to shut off the internet, and it still on:|


Screw Adelphia. It's a long story, but I got charged twice for my last bill due to a problem with their over-the-phone payment system. Their system only showed one charge, so they tried to say that there wasn't 2 charges. Meanwhile, I had the same amount taken out of my CC and debit card.

After 3 hours on the phone and 3 trips to speak to a manager with all of my statements as proof (polite the entire time) the woman in the office flipped out for no reason and threw papers at me, yelled, and threatened to call the police on me.

Let's just say my bill is PAID for the next month, $40 discount for a year, ALL the movie channels absolutely free, and free digital channels. Thanks Comcast

Edit: sorry, I just saw all this talk of cable companies/adelphia and had to rant 😀
 
Originally posted by: Thorny
Originally posted by: 2Xtreme21
Originally posted by: Thorny
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: Thorny
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: spidey07
Stealing cable is a federal crime. Good luck.

It's pretty clear cut. You stole cable service and they caught you.
That's bullshlt.

Stealing cable is if you go out to the box on the street and hook your house/apt. up and start using it.

Calling to cancel service, then discovering that the cable company was too slack to disconnect the service is not stealing. That responsibility falls to the cable company at that point.


Can you back that with a link?

You should do the same. I've read your view of what constitutes 'unauthorized' cable use, but it's no more valid than anyone else's here. I'd like to see a cite to a court case (at any level - federal, state, local) in which a consumer was held liable for cable use after the customer requested the cable service be discontinued. I can't imagine any judge would accept such a theory, but I'll freely admit I could be wrong. Show me.

I already did, its on the DOJ website. What standards do you think judges go by? I'm guessing the Dept. of JUSTICE.

You realize you're saying that during the period of time between when anyone cancels their cable service and the cable company disconnecting the line, it is illegal for that person to... live in his residence? Are you serious? Gimme your address so I can send you something and then call the cops on you saying you stole it from me. Using your logic, you'd go to jail for 6 months and be fined $1000.


The law only applies to cable, jackass. And disconnecting the line yourself provides protection for the homeowner. The OP ADMITTED using the service, he should pay.

Yeah because calling me a jackass really improves your case. :thumbsup:

And no, it's the exact same premise. Use your damn head.
 
Oh and I wouldn't pay them a dime. Tell them to show you proof of activity. Bet you'll never see it. They would require YOU to show proof for anything.

Even if they have proof I still wouldn't pay. You asked them to turn it off.
 
Originally posted by: Thorny
Any site that would be able to provide an actual court doc will charge a subscription to use it. The law is open to the judges interpretation, and they will interperet a years free service as stealing and award money to the cable company.

Again, that's just your opinion until you demonstrate otherwise. And there's lots of free websites which cite to significant legal cases, but regardless, I don't suggest you waste time looking for something that most likely doesn't exist. I've been practicing federal law for 10 years this month, and I seriously doubt any competent judge would make a customer pay a cable bill if the customer properly notified the cable company that they wished the service to be canceled. THAT action terminates the contract, and the right of the cable company to bill the customer. If the company continued the service, it's presumed to be gratis.

I think the burden of proof is on you at this time, I provided links to the law, and the fact that the OP was charged puts the ball in your court.

Being charged means nothing. Heck, I could send you a bill for my time here, but no court would make you pay it.
 
Question is... what cable company does Thorny work for? 🙂

See, folks... This is why media monopolies are BAD. When you give one company too much power in a certain area, they start to get a God complex and think that they can rewrite the laws to suit them.
 
Originally posted by: 2Xtreme21
Originally posted by: Thorny
Originally posted by: 2Xtreme21
Originally posted by: Thorny
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: Thorny
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: spidey07
Stealing cable is a federal crime. Good luck.

It's pretty clear cut. You stole cable service and they caught you.
That's bullshlt.

Stealing cable is if you go out to the box on the street and hook your house/apt. up and start using it.

Calling to cancel service, then discovering that the cable company was too slack to disconnect the service is not stealing. That responsibility falls to the cable company at that point.


Can you back that with a link?

You should do the same. I've read your view of what constitutes 'unauthorized' cable use, but it's no more valid than anyone else's here. I'd like to see a cite to a court case (at any level - federal, state, local) in which a consumer was held liable for cable use after the customer requested the cable service be discontinued. I can't imagine any judge would accept such a theory, but I'll freely admit I could be wrong. Show me.

I already did, its on the DOJ website. What standards do you think judges go by? I'm guessing the Dept. of JUSTICE.

You realize you're saying that during the period of time between when anyone cancels their cable service and the cable company disconnecting the line, it is illegal for that person to... live in his residence? Are you serious? Gimme your address so I can send you something and then call the cops on you saying you stole it from me. Using your logic, you'd go to jail for 6 months and be fined $1000.


The law only applies to cable, jackass. And disconnecting the line yourself provides protection for the homeowner. The OP ADMITTED using the service, he should pay.

Yeah because calling me a jackass really improves your case. :thumbsup:

And no, it's the exact same premise. Use your damn head.


Your logic is off. There is no law saying you can send me something unsolicited and expect me to pay for it. In fact, there is a law saying the opposite There is a law for unauthorized reception of cable service. Your trying to infer that the law I linked to somehow applied to mailed services, when it in fact does not.
 
Originally posted by: ultimatebob
Question is... what cable company does Thorny work for? 🙂

See, folks... This is why media monopolies are BAD. When you give one company too much power in a certain area, they start to get a God complex and think that they can rewrite the laws to suit them.


So thier God complex is asking this ONE individual we are discussing to pay for services he USED. :roll:

Show me the abuse please, where is it, are there any others here that have been wronged so erroniously??

Media monopolies are bad, but not because they ask someone to pay for what they used.
 
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: Thorny
Any site that would be able to provide an actual court doc will charge a subscription to use it. The law is open to the judges interpretation, and they will interperet a years free service as stealing and award money to the cable company.

Again, that's just your opinion until you demonstrate otherwise. And there's lots of free websites which cite to significant legal cases, but regardless, I don't suggest you waste time looking for something that most likely doesn't exist. I've been practicing federal law for 10 years this month, and I seriously doubt any competent judge would make a customer pay a cable bill if the customer properly notified the cable company that they wished the service to be canceled. THAT action terminates the contract, and the right of the cable company to bill the customer. If the company continued the service, it's presumed to be gratis.

I think the burden of proof is on you at this time, I provided links to the law, and the fact that the OP was charged puts the ball in your court.

Being charged means nothing. Heck, I could send you a bill for my time here, but no court would make you pay it.


I agree to disagree, because this argument could take days 🙂

My real beef isn't cable theft anyway. It's all the people in this thread that think they're ENTITLED to profit from others mistakes. Ethics and Integrity have left this country, and the honest man suffers for it.
 
Originally posted by: Thorny
Originally posted by: Thraxen
Originally posted by: Thorny
§ 553. Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service

(a) Unauthorized interception or receipt or assistance in intercepting or receiving service; "assist in intercepting or receiving" defined

HERES THE LINK

If you knew about and watched it, you have to pay. There's no free lunch with the cable company, if they catch you, you have to pay up.


That says no such thing. At best it's still a gray area. Are you claiming his signal was "unauthorized"? How can it be "unauthorized" when it's the cable company that was sending it to his house by their own choice? It's not like he was stealing it from a neighbor. He had a perfectly legit cable service, he told them to cancel the service, they stopped billing him but failed to stop the signal. So where is he at fault?

He still recieved the service, and he knew about it and used it. Read the link please. If he didn't pay for cable, his use of it was unauthorized. There is no grey area here. If he was worried about getting charged he could have unhooked the cable from HIS box in the back, free of charge.


The outlet in the home is his, the coax cable is his, the TV is his......he was using what he he owns. The only thing the cable company owns is the signal coming through that wall. They were giving that to him for free after he requested a cancellation. It is their responsibility to stop giving away free cable. What did he steal? Its not stealing if someone is feeding it to you after you tell them to stop.

All you high horse morality police idiots can rot in hell......clean up your own life before you start calling people thieves over something that is not even the case.
 
Originally posted by: PimpJuice
Originally posted by: Thorny
Originally posted by: Thraxen
Originally posted by: Thorny
§ 553. Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service

(a) Unauthorized interception or receipt or assistance in intercepting or receiving service; "assist in intercepting or receiving" defined

HERES THE LINK

If you knew about and watched it, you have to pay. There's no free lunch with the cable company, if they catch you, you have to pay up.


That says no such thing. At best it's still a gray area. Are you claiming his signal was "unauthorized"? How can it be "unauthorized" when it's the cable company that was sending it to his house by their own choice? It's not like he was stealing it from a neighbor. He had a perfectly legit cable service, he told them to cancel the service, they stopped billing him but failed to stop the signal. So where is he at fault?

He still recieved the service, and he knew about it and used it. Read the link please. If he didn't pay for cable, his use of it was unauthorized. There is no grey area here. If he was worried about getting charged he could have unhooked the cable from HIS box in the back, free of charge.


The outlet in the home is his, the coax cable is his, the TV is his......he was using what he he owns. The only thing the cable company owns is the signal coming through that wall. They were giving that to him for free after he requested a cancellation. It is their responsibility to stop giving away free cable. What did he steal? Its not stealing if someone is feeding it to you after you tell them to stop.

All you high horse morality police idiots can rot in hell......clean up your own life before you start calling people thieves over something that is not even the case.


I suppose with your logic, your neighobrs WiFi signal you steal for your internet is rightfully yours to use, since they pump it to you and all. Same for all the MP3s and movies on the net, those are fine for you to DL to because you own the computer you're using. Grow up and pay for what you use.

BTW, I'm done with this thread. You guys can go head and steal whatever you want because corporate america is evil and the law doesn't apply to you. Have fun.
 
Originally posted by: Thorny
Originally posted by: PimpJuice
Originally posted by: Thorny
Originally posted by: Thraxen
Originally posted by: Thorny
§ 553. Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service

(a) Unauthorized interception or receipt or assistance in intercepting or receiving service; "assist in intercepting or receiving" defined

HERES THE LINK

If you knew about and watched it, you have to pay. There's no free lunch with the cable company, if they catch you, you have to pay up.


That says no such thing. At best it's still a gray area. Are you claiming his signal was "unauthorized"? How can it be "unauthorized" when it's the cable company that was sending it to his house by their own choice? It's not like he was stealing it from a neighbor. He had a perfectly legit cable service, he told them to cancel the service, they stopped billing him but failed to stop the signal. So where is he at fault?

He still recieved the service, and he knew about it and used it. Read the link please. If he didn't pay for cable, his use of it was unauthorized. There is no grey area here. If he was worried about getting charged he could have unhooked the cable from HIS box in the back, free of charge.


The outlet in the home is his, the coax cable is his, the TV is his......he was using what he he owns. The only thing the cable company owns is the signal coming through that wall. They were giving that to him for free after he requested a cancellation. It is their responsibility to stop giving away free cable. What did he steal? Its not stealing if someone is feeding it to you after you tell them to stop.

All you high horse morality police idiots can rot in hell......clean up your own life before you start calling people thieves over something that is not even the case.


I suppose with your logic, your neighobrs WiFi signal you steal for your internet is rightfully yours to use, since they pump it to you and all. Same for all the MP3s and movies on the net, those are fine for you to DL to because you own the computer you're using. Grow up and pay for what you use.

BTW, I'm done with this thread. You guys can go head and steal whatever you want because corporate america is evil and the law doesn't apply to you. Have fun.


if a neighbor is dumb enough to not put WEP on their Wifi, then maybe thery deserve to have it used by others. When I originally went wireless I actually connected to my next door neighbors because the signal was stronger, I honestly didn't think to check. I hooked up my wifi adapter and BOOM internet. By your logic I was breaking the law, maybe i was, but I didn't know. I didn't have WEP on mine either, whoever wanted to get on it could.

I ended up figuring it out about 6 months later, your analogy isn't the same, having your TV hooked up to cable and having it working AFTER you told them to disconnect it, it's on them not you to turn it off.

bottom line, the cable company couldn't have possibly detected an analog signal, weather the OP was right or wrong, sh!t like this worries me. What happens when you cancel and don't check, then they want to charge you the same down the road. What's to stop them from doing it??


 
Switching to DSL now, I think 6mbps should do. =) My housemate is taking care of the comcast thing, he was the one in charge of the cable anyways so hopefully he can work something out.
 
Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
Originally posted by: AMDUALY
My housemate said that they deteceted "activity" on our line and that's why they started charging us

So the cable is always on, and they start charging you the moment you plug it in?
Sounds like they knew exactly what they were doing when they stopped billing but not the service.

It also sounds like they are playing your fears. Hoping they are right.
They detected several months of activity but just recently decided to bill you?
BS. I say the guy "finally" came out to disconnect your cable and discovered it was being used.
lol, I bet you hit the nail on the head.

Personally, I don't think it matters whether he used it or not. He told them to cancel. They stopped billing.

Another vote for don't pay a dime.
 
I'm getting in late on this, but you do not need to pay for additional service.

Your service cannot be canceled immediately, and if it is then you must receive a pro-rated refund of your remaining days. Otherwise you still have service until the remainder of your payment term.

Under the same pretence, you can still use the service until it is actually turned off, there is no reason for them not to turn it off especially if they did it late, but canceling your account does not mean you have to stop using it if it still works. (The exception is in the case of rented equipment like a cable box, which you have to return or it must be picked up at the end of your payment term to fully close the account.) All other cases, you got a free demo service beyond your payment period. Cable companies do this sometimes, meaning they enable service and or premium channels for a short time to show you what you are missing.

You are in good shape. When I was I moved out of a college apartment, I canceled my services, but they did not cancel them so I continued getting billed.
Cable was not a problem, the phone was bad as the new tenants put on hundreds of dollars of long distance. Pissed me off twice as I was not supposed to have long distance service at all.

Either way, after some headaches, I paid my last regular bill, but not for anything charged after I canceled. Don't know what they did with the long distance charges.
Cable was relatively simple, and I paid the last bill as normal.

Also, if you still had cable internet and received basic cable you are definitely into clear. Before, and some places even now for some reason cannot/do not cancel basic cable with internet cable. If it is a descrambled feed that you are receiving from other service, it is LEGAL service. Any passive cable law does not apply as you are legally receiving service, any additional services that come without any special equipment or any special means is deemed part of the service.
Furthermore, disconnecting your own cable is not required, and it could even be considered illegal as you are tampering with the service. You technically could ground your cable in your own house to completely turn it off and kill the signal for at least everyone in your area. The cable company would love that.

There used to be a place on line or somewhere where you could find a schedule of when and where premium channels, or sometimes even Pay-Per-View channels are enabled for a free preview. Anybody know where I can find this info these days?
 
Originally posted by: JetsFanatic
How did you get caught??

wondering the same thing
when we moved into our new house, ford was paying for our internet at home, thats $200 a month for commercial cable (no wonder the idiots might be goin outa biz, but thats besides the point) - anyway, when the installer came out he strait up said damn since you guys are paying so much for internet ill just leave the cable tv on (prev owner had it), and so we've had 200 free channels for the last 6yrs and going strong 😀

ps. dont pay em shiiiiit'
 
Back
Top