Quoted from LiQiCE
I don't know if the same will follow for Covad, but I'm hoping that it won't be the case, especially since I'm contracted in with them for a year!
If we are under a contract for a year, so is Covad; unless it is a unilateral contract. Which raises the issue that, if they change the rules during the contract term, you probably have the option to discontinue without penalty. (In my case, it is the $99 equipment charge that I just received the rebate for.)
In Denver (if not system-wide) Qwest is the beneficiary of the Philip Anschutz legacy. This is a real mixed bag, given the Qwest financial debacle.
Anschutz bought and sold railroads for the right-of-way. He then used the right-of-way to lay the fattest, state-of-the-art optical cable, coast-to-coast via the Southern Pacific and Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroads. I understand that he laid the entire length with a 4x factor and parts with a 7x factor. In other words, data transmission capacity of staggering proportions.
That being said, I don't care how poor Qwest or any of it's "copper" partners are, however, I doubt that any will find it necessary to limit capacity in the 21 century.
How capacity will fare for other areas served by Covad remains to be seen. We seem to have the capability to overtax everything from the environment to the economy to the fattest of pipes. Nothing remains static in the world of communication.
Just another $.02 worth.