I think that study probably only covered normal sex. Double anal isnt in my definition of "normal sex".
I think that study probably only covered normal sex. Double anal isnt in my definition of "normal sex".
The risk of contamination is much, much lower than that depending upon the type of sex that you undergo.
If you know beyond a doubt that your partner is positive, here are the odds:
Receptive anal sex is a 1 in 120 chance
Insertive anal sex is somewhere around 1 in 1500
Receptive Vaginal sex is somewhere around 1 in 5000ish
Insertive Vaginal sex is somewhere just above zero.
Keep in mind that these are per act figures, so if you plan on having sex more than once, it goes up. There is also evidence that people of Asian and African descent are far more susceptible to the disease than people of, say, Irish or German descent.
And this is all statistical work, so these odds are merely population-based, and don't account for individual circumstance.
-Funk
Why is anal sex so popular in porn? I'm hoping in real life it isn't really that popular an activity. It just seems so unhygenic to me.
Dont worry, you'll never find out, unless you are on the receiving end, and then I dont think you'll be worrying about the hygenic aspects of it.
The risk of contamination is much, much lower than that depending upon the type of sex that you undergo.
If you know beyond a doubt that your partner is positive, here are the odds:
Receptive anal sex is a 1 in 120 chance
Insertive anal sex is somewhere around 1 in 1500
Receptive Vaginal sex is somewhere around 1 in 5000ish
Insertive Vaginal sex is somewhere just above zero.
Keep in mind that these are per act figures, so if you plan on having sex more than once, it goes up. There is also evidence that people of Asian and African descent are far more susceptible to the disease than people of, say, Irish or German descent.
And this is all statistical work, so these odds are merely population-based, and don't account for individual circumstance.
-Funk[/quote]
what do you mean by "receptive" and "insertive"? are you talking about insertive as the male risk and receptive as the female risk?
what do you mean by "receptive" and "insertive"? are you talking about insertive as the male risk and receptive as the female risk?[/quote]
Don't forget that "receptive" can apply to the male as well
Originally posted by: mpitts
I better go get myself checked out.
nah, you're ok...I don't think goats can get HIV :Q
Not true I once went out/sexed up a "suicide girl" but this was in portland, OR and every damn girl there
with tats and piercing/dreads is one.
You may be confusing beloved pretty boy wrestler "Shawn" Michaels with potentially HIV infected porn employee "Sean" Michaels. I don't believe they're one in the same.
and to think, peter north is still in the biz. he started out pay-for-gay in the 80's, and he's still f-ing today.
You're kidding, right?[/quote]
I remember reading some study somewhere that said the infection rate at substantially less than half "per act".
Well, based on this news though, that study must have been seriously messed up.[/quote]
That's a probability (obviously). The probabilty of a coin toss result being tails is half. Ask yourself if the result can be tails on your first toss.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 11K
-
Discussion Speculation: Zen 4 (EPYC 4 "Genoa", Ryzen 7000, etc.)- Started by Vattila
- Replies: 13K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 8K
-
Facebook
Twitter