-
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
C2D versus my X2 boxes
Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
soydios
Platinum Member
Reading through this thread, I would have to summarize it this way: OcHungry, you make accusation after accusation, but you never put forth anything substantial to advance your side of the argument.
Ignoring price, Intel Core 2 is better than AMD K8 in every possible way: performance per watt, performance per clock cycle, overall performance, overall power consumption, and overclockability. AMD was forced to cut prices to stay on the price-performance curve, which they have, and their fabs are still maxed out on production capacity.
All the overclocking claims you're disputing on these forums, OcHungry, have been correlated all over the internet.
If you were having this argument a year ago, you would be saying that Intel Pentium4-Prescott was the best, and that we were all AMD fanboys. So, please stop spreading lies and FUD. People come here for good advice, not blatant lies.
Ignoring price, Intel Core 2 is better than AMD K8 in every possible way: performance per watt, performance per clock cycle, overall performance, overall power consumption, and overclockability. AMD was forced to cut prices to stay on the price-performance curve, which they have, and their fabs are still maxed out on production capacity.
All the overclocking claims you're disputing on these forums, OcHungry, have been correlated all over the internet.
If you were having this argument a year ago, you would be saying that Intel Pentium4-Prescott was the best, and that we were all AMD fanboys. So, please stop spreading lies and FUD. People come here for good advice, not blatant lies.
OcHungry is so hungry he hasnt eaten in awhile. dont ban him feel sorry for him and show to others this is what happens when you dont eat. lol
He can't see beyond his nose. gets everyones backs up on all forums. hes so vague on all discussions. doesnt commit to facts or reality and ignores the issues and 99% of the threads and gets personal. whenever hes presented with solid evidence he skirts round it. then when proven wrong totally avoids again and again and to throw you off the scent he appears again with some tiny inconsequential decrepancy. a sign of a liar. in his mind amd is the better no matter what open facts you present to him. he is blinded alot.
Member: The conroes faster.
OcHungry: It can't be. The ihs is the wrong colour.
Member: Idiot
100 members have not convinced him then let him be. When you see him coming just smile.
@OcHungry prove to all of us why we should sell our c2d for amd and post those amd killer benchies we been waiting for. that stupid idiot downgraded from a 6700 to a amd 939 and he is your idol. boy you got problems.
calling everyone intel mercenaries is so crazy when peeps just want to have the fastest hardware regardless if its amd or intel. old skool everyone had bbc32 micro and spectrum and you had the defunct dragon32 computer.
you got to move with the times. live with it.
One thing is certain with Amd.
More Crashes.
You can easily judge the character of a man by the way he treats those who can do nothing for him.
I always pass on good advice. It is the only thing to do with it. It is never of any use to oneself
He can't see beyond his nose. gets everyones backs up on all forums. hes so vague on all discussions. doesnt commit to facts or reality and ignores the issues and 99% of the threads and gets personal. whenever hes presented with solid evidence he skirts round it. then when proven wrong totally avoids again and again and to throw you off the scent he appears again with some tiny inconsequential decrepancy. a sign of a liar. in his mind amd is the better no matter what open facts you present to him. he is blinded alot.
Member: The conroes faster.
OcHungry: It can't be. The ihs is the wrong colour.
Member: Idiot
100 members have not convinced him then let him be. When you see him coming just smile.
@OcHungry prove to all of us why we should sell our c2d for amd and post those amd killer benchies we been waiting for. that stupid idiot downgraded from a 6700 to a amd 939 and he is your idol. boy you got problems.
calling everyone intel mercenaries is so crazy when peeps just want to have the fastest hardware regardless if its amd or intel. old skool everyone had bbc32 micro and spectrum and you had the defunct dragon32 computer.
you got to move with the times. live with it.
One thing is certain with Amd.
More Crashes.
You can easily judge the character of a man by the way he treats those who can do nothing for him.
I always pass on good advice. It is the only thing to do with it. It is never of any use to oneself
I believe we have a BINGO!
I swore up and down that Rollo was a viral marketer and he tried to get me banned for saying this only to finally confess that he was indeed a viral marketer.
These viral types really piss me off. Good information is hard enough to find between the fanboys, the greenhorns, and the people who are just plain stupid. Viral marketers pretending to be stupid are just an increased annoyance.
I think the mods keeps assclowns like OcHungry around just to keep us stirred up, lol. :laugh:
A few posts back you admitted high temp after no one bought your claim of 47c load temp. I said I take back what I said because you were man enough to admit it. Now you keep rehashing the same subject and continue to offend me. You just don?t get it do you?
Below is a thread that answer's your questions about my 4400 overclocking, temp and cooling. Read the pages and view all the screenshots.
BTW, if you think what I say I cannot back up, let me make it easy on you: I don?t Lie.
http://www.ocforums.com/showthread.php?t=473441
EDIT: And for the rest of you who redicule a fellow human being, may god have mercy on you. I forgive you because you never knew and will never know the meaning of decency, kindness and fairness- you are a pagan.
GundamSonicZeroX
Platinum Member
Please don't feed the troll. He'll just try to find something 'wrong' with the benchies and he'll be even bigger than before. Just like those guys who say that ATI cards can't do HDR+AA even though they can.
EDIT: Nvm, I just saw the ammount of pages and realized that my post will have no effect.
EDIT: Nvm, I just saw the ammount of pages and realized that my post will have no effect.
Still room on the bandwagon?
You can play the passive aggressive card if you want, but you'll get nowhere with it.
The facts:
You've accused respected members of being Intel fanboys. These same members were previously Amd fans, when amd was king, and started advocating Intel only when that's where the performance edge was. These accused members also recommended Amd to someone for whom it made sense to them. Not really any evidence of fanboyism there. -->You owe an apology.
You've accused them of being liars for stating 3.5GHz stable overclocks, when there are multiple people with the same results, both here and elsewhere. You went as far as to say:
With your accusations and misinformation you get a pile of heated insults. But you fired the first shots, and stuck to your guns about being right. Now you claim the 'ooh i'm so hurt, but i forgive you.' Your apology to Markfw was conditional and sounded more like you were accepting his apology. It was an empty apology.
You owe the members you accused an unconditional apology, and any less shows you for what you are. A troll and a fool.
You can play the passive aggressive card if you want, but you'll get nowhere with it.
The facts:
You've accused respected members of being Intel fanboys. These same members were previously Amd fans, when amd was king, and started advocating Intel only when that's where the performance edge was. These accused members also recommended Amd to someone for whom it made sense to them. Not really any evidence of fanboyism there. -->You owe an apology.
You've accused them of being liars for stating 3.5GHz stable overclocks, when there are multiple people with the same results, both here and elsewhere. You went as far as to say:
Accusing anyone who's OC'd a C2D to 3.5 of being a liar. There are many examples of this, here and elsewhere, and one accused member went so far as to do a 12 hour run of a commonly used (around here) stress program for you. --> You owe another apology.
With your accusations and misinformation you get a pile of heated insults. But you fired the first shots, and stuck to your guns about being right. Now you claim the 'ooh i'm so hurt, but i forgive you.' Your apology to Markfw was conditional and sounded more like you were accepting his apology. It was an empty apology.
You owe the members you accused an unconditional apology, and any less shows you for what you are. A troll and a fool.
Markfw
Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
Everyone except YOU agreed that was a good temp. Different software shows different numbers. And your temps are at idle in your screenshot, not under load. I still have no apologies, and no ackowegdements from you that my rig is stable OC'ed to 3.5 and no acknowledgement that us X2 owners are NOT sorry we changed over. Everyone else is upset, since you never admit your faults, just change the subject once proven wrong.
GundamSonicZeroX
Platinum Member
*raises hand*
But enough with this child's play, I propose that we contact a mod and request for OCHungry to be punished.
But enough with this child's play, I propose that we contact a mod and request for OCHungry to be punished.
geokilla
Platinum Member
*raises hand*
What is a good program to monitor CPU temps. (getting off topic...sorry) I use PC Probe and it says my load temps are around 48DC under load at 2.1GHZ and 38DC for RAM. Using Core Temp it says 55DC in Core 0 and 48DC in Core 1. Such a HUGE difference. Which program should I trust. That RAM is also overclocked to 700MHZ....somehow....
Just to let you know....this is my first time overclocking. Is my warranty voided already?? If yes....NNNNNNNNOOOOOOO
What is a good program to monitor CPU temps. (getting off topic...sorry) I use PC Probe and it says my load temps are around 48DC under load at 2.1GHZ and 38DC for RAM. Using Core Temp it says 55DC in Core 0 and 48DC in Core 1. Such a HUGE difference. Which program should I trust. That RAM is also overclocked to 700MHZ....somehow....
Just to let you know....this is my first time overclocking. Is my warranty voided already?? If yes....NNNNNNNNOOOOOOO
Bill Brasky
Diamond Member
I've always used Speedfan. I like that it shows you a cpu temp, core temp, and mosfet temp.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 24K
-
-
