- Jan 31, 2010
- 7
- 0
- 0
My current rig lasted unusually long and I am have grown fond of it for that reason, but everything must go eventually and now that my mobo sata controller died it seems like its time for upgrade.
What I liked about it 4300 was a steal as it oc'ed to 3+ years of stable 3.15 GHz from stock 1.8 , which turned to be enough for long time. Only thing I was upgrading was my GPU. So mainly I am looking to replicate same kind of good deal with next CPU. -CPU which is under $200 and can last over 4 years !
Basically i655k and pII 1065 BE are two main candidates right now . I frankly would go with i655k if it had quad core. But since I already have dual core right now upgrading to another dual core seems like not that much of future proof upgrade.
On other hand amd is 45nm and seems not much of an overclocker. For long lasting rig I d have to have plenty of breathing room in OC area. So thats tilts the scales toward intel again. Only if intel had some quad core 32nm at sub $200 price range....
So anyone would be so nice to share any thoughts?
p.s. I am a "power user" - I run lots of various stuff (1 or 2 VMs, Visual Studio, and having ten thousand firefox tabs open is the typical "hard load" scenario), but performance wise the only time I am really concerned is for gaming, most everything I play (f3, BF:BC2 if looking at recent titles) worked fine with that setup , but I do start getting feeling I am getting constrained more and more. I absolutely don't give a damn about encoding or photoshop
What I liked about it 4300 was a steal as it oc'ed to 3+ years of stable 3.15 GHz from stock 1.8 , which turned to be enough for long time. Only thing I was upgrading was my GPU. So mainly I am looking to replicate same kind of good deal with next CPU. -CPU which is under $200 and can last over 4 years !
Basically i655k and pII 1065 BE are two main candidates right now . I frankly would go with i655k if it had quad core. But since I already have dual core right now upgrading to another dual core seems like not that much of future proof upgrade.
On other hand amd is 45nm and seems not much of an overclocker. For long lasting rig I d have to have plenty of breathing room in OC area. So thats tilts the scales toward intel again. Only if intel had some quad core 32nm at sub $200 price range....
So anyone would be so nice to share any thoughts?
p.s. I am a "power user" - I run lots of various stuff (1 or 2 VMs, Visual Studio, and having ten thousand firefox tabs open is the typical "hard load" scenario), but performance wise the only time I am really concerned is for gaming, most everything I play (f3, BF:BC2 if looking at recent titles) worked fine with that setup , but I do start getting feeling I am getting constrained more and more. I absolutely don't give a damn about encoding or photoshop
Last edited:
