C Strings are great but now here's the C++ String

[her209]

Reference

Unlike traditional c-strings, which are mere sequences of characters in a memory array, C++ string objects belong to a class with many built-in features to operate with strings in a more intuitive way and with some additional useful features common to C++ containers.

 

[Colt45]

We don't need no stinkin' classes.

 

[Howard]

Classes? We don't need no stinkin' classes.

fixed

 

[Zebo]

Debbie downer.

 

[Syringer]

fixed

Needs more fixing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stinking_badges

 

[Analog]

good one.

I like C#

 

[HopJokey]

8.1/10

 

[newb111]

Debbie downer.

Debbie does Classes?

 

[SirStev0]

Needs more fixing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stinking_badges

I don't know how I feel about that info. Everyone knows it from Blazing Saddles. Yeah it might have been Mel Brooks spoofing some old western, but that doesn't really mean it is "misquoted".

 

[kalrith]

I don't know how I feel about that info. Everyone knows it from Blazing Saddles. Yeah it might have been Mel Brooks spoofing some old western, but that doesn't really mean it is "misquoted".

I disagree with that page as well. I'm quite certain that the people in this thread were quoting Blazing Saddles and not trying to quote The Treasure of the Sierra Madre; therefore, no misquoting occurred.

It would be like intentionally quoting a line from Spaceballs and having someone say that you're misquoting a line from Star Wars. You weren't quoting Star Wars at all and are therefore not misquoting anything.