Originally posted by: FrankyJunior
That's why there are BUYERS agents and SELLERS agents. That's why you get YOUR OWN REALTOR. Never talk to the one selling the house, get one that is there to help you BUY your house.
And if you get a good realtor (ask friends for references) they will educate you on tons of things you probably had no idea about.
Wrong. There is the
Selling agent and the
Listing agent (respectively). There is no "Buyers" agent, and both agents work for and are paid by the seller only.
The Listing agent (what you called the "Sellers" agent) works exclusively for the seller.
The Selling agent (what you erroneously called the "Buyers" agent) works for the buyer only insofar as finding a home that meets the buyers' wants and qualifications. Once that home is found, the selling agent then works for the sellers in making sure that the buyers work with the process and submit an offer that the seller is likely to accept, etc.
Say "Buyers" and "Sellers" agents in a government underwriter's office and you're likely to be kicked out permanently. Those are marketing names, not approved legal terms.
It is quite easy to get a loan program where you get put less than 20% down and still avoid MI (damnit people, PMI is a company and a brand name). In general, these program require a slightly higher interest rate but, as MI is not tax-deductible while mortgage interest is, it generally makes more sense to pay the slightly higher rate.
MI does NOT go to the mortgage company, nor does your lender profit off of it in any way. In order for a loan that requires mortgage insurance (per program underwriting requirements) to be properly packaged, portfolio'ed, and securitized, then a mortgage insurance policy must be acquire for it. The funds collected (either paid monthly, which is typical, or by "super single" upfront premium) go to the mortgage insurance company, the largest of which are PMI, Radian, MGIC, and RMIC. The purpose of mortgage insurance is to insure the lender in case the borrower defaults, and the lender is forced to foreclose and possible "short-sale".
In a loan with a LTV > 80% (i.e. down less than 20%) where the lender does not require MI, the risk is absorbed into the slightly higher interest rate, as mentioned above. This can be done one of two ways: either a single loan at the slightly higher rate, or the most ideal way, which is a combination of 2 mortgages, the 1st at or near the prevailing rate and at 80% LTV, and the 2nd at or near the prevailing rate for 2nd mortgages for the remainder.
My last tip about mortgages, real estate, and home buying. It seems to me that there is no industry in this country where people who know almost nothing about it think that they know more than the professionals who do it every day. For the last 10 years, I have taken more mortgage applications every single week (except when on vacation) that the average homeowner will fill out in their lifetime. Unless you are dealing with an idiot or a green rookie, you do NOT know more than the professional working for you, and if you are working with a less than ethical individual, thinking and acting so is an easy way to get screwed.