Originally posted by: Paulson
I'd buy them and just convert them to mp3.... no quality loss because I'd be using the file and then transfering it into wave, and then finally into mp3.. so technically I don't think there'd be that much of a loss..
I'm happy though, this will be a good new way to download music legally..
Originally posted by: Paulson
I'd buy them and just convert them to mp3.... no quality loss because I'd be using the file and then transfering it into wave, and then finally into mp3.. so technically I don't think there'd be that much of a loss..
I'm happy though, this will be a good new way to download music legally..
Definitely - keeping track of the number of times you've downloaded and burned each song is lterally impossible. It's counterintuitive - once you buy the song, it should be YOURS TO KEEP. Jesus - how hard is that for the industry to understand?Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: Paulson
I'd buy them and just convert them to mp3.... no quality loss because I'd be using the file and then transfering it into wave, and then finally into mp3.. so technically I don't think there'd be that much of a loss..
I'm happy though, this will be a good new way to download music legally..
How do you plan on doing that? There's a reason they added the DRM stuff.
Anyway, this site is a lot less straightforward than iTunes. The license terms and prices vary per song. That oculd get confusing really easily.
I think pretty much any downloadable music store is going to impose such limits now. With itunes, can you burn as much as you'd like?Originally posted by: jumpr
I think this is a HUGE step in the right direction for music lovers. I am not sure if I will download any songs from this site however, becuase they place limits on the amount of times you can download the song, and on the number of times you can burn it to CD.
I'd be so nervous about accidentally deleting the file that I'm hesitant to purchase any music. Although, I guess if I converted it right to MP3, I'd have the same quality and zero limitations.
What programs are available to do this?
Originally posted by: jumpr
I think this is a HUGE step in the right direction for music lovers. I am not sure if I will download any songs from this site however, becuase they place limits on the amount of times you can download the song, and on the number of times you can burn it to CD.
Originally posted by: Paulson
I'd buy them and just convert them to mp3.... no quality loss because I'd be using the file and then transfering it into wave, and then finally into mp3.. so technically I don't think there'd be that much of a loss..
I'm happy though, this will be a good new way to download music legally..
Yes.Originally posted by: MrBond
With itunes, can you burn as much as you'd like?
Originally posted by: MrBond
I was always under the impression that 128kbs wma was about a 256kbs mp3 file. I encode songs to 64kbs wma to cram more on my ppc storage card and they sound at about as good as a 128kbs mp3.
OK, from what I was reading, the limits are set by the studios, NOT the site.Originally posted by: notfred
Yes.Originally posted by: MrBond
With itunes, can you burn as much as you'd like?
Originally posted by: MrBond
OK, from what I was reading, the limits are set by the studios, NOT the site.Originally posted by: notfred
Yes.Originally posted by: MrBond
With itunes, can you burn as much as you'd like?
I've never been to apple's music store, but don't they have music from Warner Music artists? Why do they decide unlimited burns for apple customers and only 3 for PC users?
Originally posted by: MrBond
OK, from what I was reading, the limits are set by the studios, NOT the site.Originally posted by: notfred
Yes.Originally posted by: MrBond
With itunes, can you burn as much as you'd like?
I've never been to apple's music store, but don't they have music from Warner Music artists? Why do they decide unlimited burns for apple customers and only 3 for PC users?
Originally posted by: jumpr
I think this is a HUGE step in the right direction for music lovers. I am not sure if I will download any songs from this site however, becuase they place limits on the amount of times you can download the song, and on the number of times you can burn it to CD.
I'd be so nervous about accidentally deleting the file that I'm hesitant to purchase any music. Although, I guess if I converted it right to MP3, I'd have the same quality and zero limitations.
What programs are available to do this?
Originally posted by: MrBond
There's no copy protection on mp3s.Originally posted by: rpc64
Why the heck aren't they using mp3s? This sounds cool and is a step in the right direction but don't you think they would be more successful using mp3s?
I was always under the impression that 128kbs wma was about a 256kbs mp3 file. I encode songs to 64kbs wma to cram more on my ppc storage card and they sound at about as good as a 128kbs mp3.
As far as pricing, I only looked at one album (Tom Petty - The Last DJ), the cNet article had songs at $0.79/ea while for that album they were $0.89/ea or $7.95 for the whole thing. There's not much "popular" music out right now that I'm interested in at the moment.
I'll try converting it and such when I get some time tonight, if I could download as a WMA then convert to an mp3 so winamp can play it, it might be actually worth it.
Originally posted by: jumpr
I think this is a HUGE step in the right direction for music lovers. I am not sure if I will download any songs from this site however, becuase they place limits on the amount of times you can download the song, and on the number of times you can burn it to CD.
I'd be so nervous about accidentally deleting the file that I'm hesitant to purchase any music. Although, I guess if I converted it right to MP3, I'd have the same quality and zero limitations.
What programs are available to do this?
Please read the thread.Originally posted by: BatmanNate
Hell no. MP3, 192k True stereo at least if you want people to pay for it. Jesus what is wrong with these guys.
I feel the same way...I usually use half.com, though. 🙂Originally posted by: DOACleric
As great as all these music downloads might be, i still find them overly expensive, restrictive, and lacking in quality. I can usually find used CD's in the $4-8 range either in local stores or on Amazon.com. The CD's are cheaper, higher quality, and I can do whatever the heck i want with them. So I might have to stand up and do some walking to get the CD's. In my eyes, thats a good thing 🙂
The thing about the version of WMA being used is that they're using the v.9 audio codec, and v.9 DRM. While Winamp can play WMAs, including v.9 encoded content, Winamp is not DRM-aware, and can not play DRM'd content. The same thing goes for basically any other piece of software or device; only WMP9 can handle the v.9 DRM, and is the only thing that can play it. The only reason you can even burn it or upload it to a portable is because WMP9 can read the DRM and count that against burns and portable transfers, and the only reason it's allowed in an insecure form on a portable is because the only approved portables are those that won't let you get the music back. The only way to listen to the song on a normal device is to burn it, then rip it in an "open" format, although you suffer a double-encoding penelty(the WMA encode, then the MP3 encode), which causes some additional quality loss.Originally posted by: SSP
Winamp plays WMA. You dont need to convert them to MP3 just to play it there.