Of course I read the link. Houston got the "crown" for worst air-pollution because CA was actually doing something about it. Unlike Bush during his tenure in TX. I think it's YOU who needs to get a clue. Who gives a rat's ass about what CA is doing or not doing. The problem, as it was being discussed, was a TX problem. Nobody except you, demanded that we compare/contrast the entire country to TX.Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Get a clue - did you even read the link YOU posted? Do you understand how Houston got it's "crown" yet?
And again you fail to see that I questioned BOTH of their direct responsibilities in the matter. Yes, it is a serious issue and the Govenor should do what is within his power to curtail pollution - but I'd rather have the pollution and jobs than less pollution and no jobs You see - Pollution(waste) goes hand in hand with Economic centers. It's just a fact of life. People and manufacturing/industry produce waste.
Additionally, I don't see this as a black or white issue. I'd rather have both a clean environment and a healthy job-base and economy. It can be done, you just don't want to make the investment. You (and Bush) would rather spend our nation's cash bombing the sh!t out of some hapless middle eastern country. Sad and pathetic is what it is. You and Bush both seem complacent enough about our environment to let it turn to sh!t while framing it as a "choice" between jobs or the environment. What a crock.