Some people like Moore and Franken, and many others, kept asking during the election, "why are the majority of Bush supports voting AGAINST their own best interest?". This question fell on deaf ears, apparently, but those "RED" State's "poor folk" are soon to get a harsh reality check from their leader, GW. Enjoy that cat food peoples!
-
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
Bush's budget axe to fall on poor
- Thread starter randym431
- Start date
dannybin1742
Platinum Member
so true
Could it be that a majority of the red state populations are not so dependant of government handouts.
Forcing people to go back before the New Deal might generate a kick in the pants and remove some of the open-hands that exist in a lot of cities.
Now look at what senator/congress critters they send to DC. You will find some red states are blue, and some blue states are red, with most of the remaining being purple.
NOt as cut and dried as how they voted for the president as i spent the time and actually sorted thought them. I posted the breakdown in one of the post election threads.
There may be a large difference between dependent on handouts and receiving them.
Stunt
Diamond Member
I'm pretty sure the people in this thread are reffering to federal red states...the ones who voted in the most recent election which resulted in these budget cuts.
Republicans own the senate and house, they will not go against bush on this...so where they come from doesnt matter.
CaptnKirk
Lifer
There may be a large difference between dependent on handouts and receiving them.
You seriously think that those states didn't take that money willingly ?
How many do you think turned it down.
In caes you missed the point, those 'Blue States' were the ones that paid for the
'Red States' funding deficiencies.
Somehow the 'public' there, probably because of a lack of specific knowledge of facts,
let a 'hot button' morality issue - whether real, or perceived, mold thier votes.
Always in the past, the farm belt - the Heartland of America' was taken care of by the
Democrats. They passed the laws that gave the residents assess to power and energy,
paved the roads, and in general provided for the public good in those communitities.
Then slowly over a span of time the Republican party used the fear of racial diversity
as a tool to drive a wedge between those who needed assistance of any sort, and used
their bigotry and convinced them that the 'minorities' were taking all their hard earned
money to support 'Welfare Queens' (Ray-Gun Era) and they were taking their jobs away
because them 'Norities' wold work cheaper cause they're a lower class (Rush-a-Roni)
Mix in all them there 'queers eyen' their boys (Musta been Preists in them there hills),
And the Feminazi Lezzies chasin their women and farm animals - somehow they forgot
what what in the hell got them modernization, and let a mind-rinsing (less effort than a brainwashing)
erode thier knowledge into a compelsion to do what Conservative Right wanted them to do.
It was well organized, and they never saw the truck coming to run them over.
In the real world - the Haliburtons, Bechtels, RMK-BRJ's, Enrons, Silverado Savings,
Carlyle Group companies of the world were in fact, the real 'Welfare Queens' and still are.
Yep the 'My-Morities' will work for less, so the 'Welfare Queens' laid off thousands of 'Mericans'
so they could send many thousands of jobs to 'Off-Shore' & 'Outsourced' their jobs to countries
where the companies could realize much higher proffit - AND through 'Government Assisted Grants,
Programs, Etc. - they did not have as much tax to pay either, more padding to the bottom line.
If we give a couple hundred bucks to the borderline, just making it taxpayer, they won't notice that the people who do less -
and make so much more, are getting 10, 20, 100 times the tax breaks that they got. They'll run out and but a new color TV,
or a SUV to impress themselves with, and then they get to buy more - and pay more for gas.
Hell, they got a couple hundred back at tax time, and take home an extra $ 10 -15 bucks a week.
I got me a thousand dollar re-distribution of the wealth - never noticing the $ 80 K and more that the
'Real Bush Support Machine' got - they don't move in those circles, the uninvited don't know.
Smoke and Mirrors, don't let them see that the Wizard and the Emperor has no clothes.
You seriously think that those states didn't take that money willingly ?
How many do you think turned it down.
In caes you missed the point, those 'Blue States' were the ones that paid for the
'Red States' funding deficiencies.
Somehow the 'public' there, probably because of a lack of specific knowledge of facts,
let a 'hot button' morality issue - whether real, or perceived, mold thier votes.
Always in the past, the farm belt - the Heartland of America' was taken care of by the
Democrats. They passed the laws that gave the residents assess to power and energy,
paved the roads, and in general provided for the public good in those communitities.
Then slowly over a span of time the Republican party used the fear of racial diversity
as a tool to drive a wedge between those who needed assistance of any sort, and used
their bigotry and convinced them that the 'minorities' were taking all their hard earned
money to support 'Welfare Queens' (Ray-Gun Era) and they were taking their jobs away
because them 'Norities' wold work cheaper cause they're a lower class (Rush-a-Roni)
Mix in all them there 'queers eyen' their boys (Musta been Preists in them there hills),
And the Feminazi Lezzies chasin their women and farm animals - somehow they forgot
what what in the hell got them modernization, and let a mind-rinsing (less effort than a brainwashing)
erode thier knowledge into a compelsion to do what Conservative Right wanted them to do.
It was well organized, and they never saw the truck coming to run them over.
In the real world - the Haliburtons, Bechtels, RMK-BRJ's, Enrons, Silverado Savings,
Carlyle Group companies of the world were in fact, the real 'Welfare Queens' and still are.
Yep the 'My-Morities' will work for less, so the 'Welfare Queens' laid off thousands of 'Mericans'
so they could send many thousands of jobs to 'Off-Shore' & 'Outsourced' their jobs to countries
where the companies could realize much higher proffit - AND through 'Government Assisted Grants,
Programs, Etc. - they did not have as much tax to pay either, more padding to the bottom line.
If we give a couple hundred bucks to the borderline, just making it taxpayer, they won't notice that the people who do less -
and make so much more, are getting 10, 20, 100 times the tax breaks that they got. They'll run out and but a new color TV,
or a SUV to impress themselves with, and then they get to buy more - and pay more for gas.
Hell, they got a couple hundred back at tax time, and take home an extra $ 10 -15 bucks a week.
I got me a thousand dollar re-distribution of the wealth - never noticing the $ 80 K and more that the
'Real Bush Support Machine' got - they don't move in those circles, the uninvited don't know.
Smoke and Mirrors, don't let them see that the Wizard and the Emperor has no clothes.
MisterCornell
Banned
What you don't get is that the people who are dependent on welfare handouts in the red states mostly voted Democrat.
It's not the middle class famlies here in Ohio that are getting the benefit of federal government handouts. I personally don't give a sh|t if Shaniqua in the ghetto has her welfare cut.
It's not the middle class famlies here in Ohio that are getting the benefit of federal government handouts. I personally don't give a sh|t if Shaniqua in the ghetto has her welfare cut.
MisterCornell
Banned
It's common knowledge, dumbfvck. Democrats support the welfare state. Those dependent on welfare vote Democrat.
I don't even know of any Democrats who would argue with that. 😕
Stunt
Diamond Member
Ah, so out of your a$$...thanks for clarifying.
I could make the argument that rural people in general make less than urban, also have higher unemployment and vote on social issues. This would indicate the poorer vote republican.
Although im not dumb enough to make broad statements like that without facts to back it up. Till that point, you comment is void, useless, ignorant, etc 🙂
MisterCornell
Banned
You are a whiny Canadian bitch. Nevertheless, I will educate you:
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/US/P/00/epolls.0.html
It's not the people making over $200,000 who are collecting welfare, BTW.
The $50,000-$150,000 middle/upper-middle class income bracket is the base of support of the Republican party.
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/US/P/00/epolls.0.html
It's not the people making over $200,000 who are collecting welfare, BTW.
The $50,000-$150,000 middle/upper-middle class income bracket is the base of support of the Republican party.
Steeplerot
Lifer
the rich folks beneifit far more money from corprate welfare then the random black person in the ghetto you make refrence to.
Why are you defending rich folk anyway? jealous much?
Why are you defending rich folk anyway? jealous much?
Stunt
Diamond Member
Actually your data has nothing to do with welfare recipiants.
How do you know the people who make less than $15000 are not part of a household with a part time job?
Also, last time i checked, walmart hasn't been paying so hot, how do you know these people are not working low end jobs.
you have no evidence that these people are mooching off the system.
I could make the arguement that the upper income earners (who are mostly bush) are not dependent on handouts in the form of tax cuts?
Again, you point is based on a who bunch of assumptions...
Srounge around for more data which fit your opinions 🙂
PS. Who pissed in your cornflakes this morning 😉
Steeplerot
Lifer
don't feed the trolls stunt you should know that. He will grow up and learn someday. Damn welfare queen red-staters 😉
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 25K
-
-
-
