Bush would beat Clinton in latest poll. Finally America wakes up, and doesn't want to repeat the error's of the past.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,88691,00.html
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,88691,00.html
Originally posted by: Bigdude
Bush would beat Clinton in latest poll. Finally America wakes up, and doesn't want to repeat the error's of the past.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,88691,00.html
Polling was conducted by telephone June 3-4, 2003 in the evenings. The sample is 900 registered voters nationwide with a margin of error of ±3 percentage points.
Originally posted by: Bigdude
Bush would beat Clinton in latest poll. Finally America wakes up, and doesn't want to repeat the error's of the past.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,88691,00.html
Get over it.Originally posted by: Bigdude
Bush would beat Clinton in latest poll. Finally America wakes up, and doesn't want to repeat the error's of the past.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,88691,00.html
No less scientific than the CBS Poll, the Gallup, etc, etc, etc......polls are pretty much meaningless anyway...depending on how you phrase the questions and where you ask the questions you can get any result you would like.Originally posted by: Insane3D
Originally posted by: Bigdude
Bush would beat Clinton in latest poll. Finally America wakes up, and doesn't want to repeat the error's of the past.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,88691,00.html
Yay!! Bigdude's parents are away again so he can post threads with the computah!
Polling was conducted by telephone June 3-4, 2003 in the evenings. The sample is 900 registered voters nationwide with a margin of error of ±3 percentage points.
Well that settles it for me. A Fox News poll of a whole 900 people, asking about a "what if" scenario....doesn't get any more scientific than that!
To lather up the Rs, why else?Why is FOXNEWS spending money on polling for a question/matchup that could not happen
Originally posted by: Bigdude
Bush would beat Clinton in latest poll. Finally America wakes up, and doesn't want to repeat the error's of the past.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,88691,00.html
Originally posted by: Spyro
Originally posted by: Bigdude
Bush would beat Clinton in latest poll. Finally America wakes up, and doesn't want to repeat the error's of the past.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,88691,00.html
I eagerly await your banning! :disgust:
So you think you can spout your opinion, but he can't spout his? Yea, whatever.Originally posted by: Spyro
I eagerly await your banning! :disgust:Originally posted by: Bigdude
Bush would beat Clinton in latest poll. Finally America wakes up, and doesn't want to repeat the error's of the past.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,88691,00.html
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Will Bush be able to run for a second term if he is impeached for defrauding the government like he should be?
Unfortunately, that's how free speech works. All, including those who are incorrect, are able to voice their opinions (Bush is the next Ein Fuhrer, Gore really won, yadda yadda yadda). How's that Voltaire quote go? Something on the order of "I may not agree with what you have to say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it," IIRC.Originally posted by: Crimson
Here's a tissue.. wahh wahh wahhhh! You should be impeached from Anandtech.Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Will Bush be able to run for a second term if he is impeached for defrauding the government like he should be?
Whats wrong with helping people that need help. This country has turned into a bunch of spoiled selfish brats
Finally America wakes up, and doesn't want to repeat the error's of the past.
Originally posted by: jliechty
So you think you can spout your opinion, but he can't spout his? Yea, whatever.Originally posted by: Spyro
I eagerly await your banning! :disgust:Originally posted by: Bigdude
Bush would beat Clinton in latest poll. Finally America wakes up, and doesn't want to repeat the error's of the past.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,88691,00.html
(this is not saying that I endorse the poll or consider it useful or even statistically correct, but just that I think Spyro's statement was quite idiotic.)