Bush Wants Permanent Ban on Web Access Taxes

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,144
18,688
146
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush on Tuesday called for a permanent ban on Internet access taxes in a speech that echoed his campaign stand against imposing new taxes on the billions of dollars in e-commerce.

"We need to ban Internet access taxes," Bush said in a speech to the Electronic Industries Alliance, a trade group representing high technology companies. "We need to understand how powerful the Internet can be to commerce and growth."

In 1998, Congress enacted three-year bans, set to expire on Oct. 21, on taxing the charges people pay for Internet service and on imposing discriminatory taxes that treat Internet sales differently from other forms of remote commerce like catalog sales.

The issue pits the high tech industry against states and local authorities who fear the loss of sales tax revenues that they use to pay for everything from schools to ambulances.

Currently, Internet retailers are generally treated like catalog retailers, collecting sales tax only if they have a physical presence, like a store or a warehouse, in the purchaser's jurisdiction.

During the 2000 presidential campaign Bush said he favored making the ban on Internet access taxes permanent and extending the ban on discriminatory Internet taxes by up to five years.

"The president favors extension of the moratorium on Internet taxation and he favors a permanent ban on all Internet access taxes," White House spokesman Ari Fleischer told reporters on Tuesday.

Fleischer said Bush would work with Congress on deciding how long to extend the moratorium, saying officials needed to study how the Internet would affect government revenues.
 

Shmorq

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2000
3,431
1
0
Nice! Maybe Bush isn't so bad after all...
The thing is though, the government must get their taxes from one source or another, so overall, they'll still be getting our money one way or another.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,144
18,688
146


<< Nice! Maybe Bush isn't so bad after all...
The thing is though, the government must get their taxes from one source or another, so overall, they'll still be getting our money one way or another.
>>



Yep, which is why spending cuts are needed too.
 

Kamak

Junior Member
Jan 30, 2001
19
0
0
Someone should tell the tele-comm companies, the FCC and congress about that. Maybe they can remove the Spanish-American War tax that is currently being stolen from my family. Or how bout the 'Federal Access Fee' and othe assorted tack-on fees. Sounds like a tax to me. With 1 home line, cell phone and DSL, all of the 'fees' add up to 10-20% of the bill.

I love G.W. Bush, but please quit blowing smoke up our assets.
 

ThisIsMatt

Banned
Aug 4, 2000
11,820
1
0
WTH is &quot;number portability svc charge&quot; and &quot;Charges for Network Access for Interstate Calling, Imposed by FCC&quot;? I don't plan to &quot;move&quot; my number, and who's making any interstate calling? Not me...
 

woodie1

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2000
5,947
0
0


<< I say they propose a tax of $1.00 per call for every unsolicited phone call!

Cheers!
>>



Excellent idea.
 

Shmorq

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2000
3,431
1
0


<< say they propose a tax of $1.00 per call for every unsolicited phone call! >>

I agree too! This should generate enough revenues for the government to do away with sales and income tax!
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,837
2,621
136
No new taxes.

Where have I heard that before.

For what its worth, I doubt any politician has the same definition of &quot;permanent&quot; esp. as regardless to taxing or other policies that a normal human being would.

Frankly, I think he is just grandstanding-again not an uncommon trait among pols-by championing a popular position when it is highly unlikely that such taxes would be approved anytime soon, anyways.