• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Bush to Promote Marriage in $1.5 Billion Plan, Report Says

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: alchemize
I like the scholarship idea, and tie it to grades!

Is this discretionary or budgeted?

Pie in the Sky at this point.

Problem with scholarships is that many of the low income people have poor grades (due to weak background and unresponsive school systems).

The money would be better split by funding some into the school systems and the lower income families <$30K year.

Strengthen educational system -> Quality education -> Better jobs -> Family stability -> Community Responsibility => (perpetuating cycle) 😀
 
Man you guys a gullible.

Yes he has many proposels, space, amnesty, this, that, etc. Do you think Bush and Rove think these will pass congress? No, they dont, they are simply political moves. They propose these to tell certain groups they tried, but infact they really didnt do anything. They get credit for trying, and then can point fingers at the democrats.
 
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Man you guys a gullible.

Yes he has many proposels, space, amnesty, this, that, etc. Do you think Bush and Rove think these will pass congress? No, they dont, they are simply political moves. They propose these to tell certain groups they tried, but infact they really didnt do anything. They get credit for trying, and then can point fingers at the democrats.

Yes, they will pass in the R-controlled Congress. Unless the Dems fillibuster, which is unlikely unless it has something to do with appointing conservative judges...
 
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Man you guys a gullible.

Yes he has many proposels, space, amnesty, this, that, etc. Do you think Bush and Rove think these will pass congress? No, they dont, they are simply political moves. They propose these to tell certain groups they tried, but infact they really didnt do anything. They get credit for trying, and then can point fingers at the democrats.

Yes, they will pass in the R-controlled Congress. Unless the Dems fillibuster, which is unlikely unless it has something to do with appointing conservative judges...

Many of the ideas will not pass constitutional muster.

The Dems are not going to open the checkbook on their own, and many of the normal republicans are not going to accept the hijacking of the republican position on government by the ultras.

 
No sex please, you're American

The Bush administration is pouring millions of dollars into programmes that persuade teenagers to hold on to their virginity. And it's working. Suzanne Goldenberg reports

Monday September 8, 2003
The Guardian

It's a few minutes before showtime, and the air in the church hall has that slightly tingling sense of anticipation that often occurs in crowds of sweaty teenagers. The girls are tugging at their T-shirts and smoothing their hair, the boys laughing too loudly. They are here to spend the next few hours talking about sex. Then, they are going to declare in front of total strangers that they will swear off all forms of sex until they are married.
"I just want to wait until I meet the right person," says 16-year-old Lindsey Bocheck. "The world is so messed up as it is. Society wants you to be a whore basically."

Welcome to the world of teenage abstinence, a choice championed by the reigning Miss America and until recently (following her confessions about the true nature of her relationship with Justin Timberlake) Britney Spears, and embraced by some 2.5 million young people in the United States in the past decade. In an age obsessed with sex, they inhabit an interior universe where intercourse turns relationships stale and leads to break-ups, condoms don't work and those weak enough to have tried the pleasures of the flesh are inevitably sorry.

"You don't realise what you are doing until everything has changed," says 16-year-old John Wagster, peering earnestly through round glasses as he explains his decision to embrace chastity. "You are having oral sex, and you don't realise it's wrong. It's like eating Pringles. Once you start, you can't stop."

Only you can - or you should. At least that is the message heavily promoted by the Bush administration which has allocated $117m (£74m) for abstinence-only education for teenagers this year, and hopes to raise it to $135m.

The administration has also begun to preach the same gospel to adults, releasing funds to make the nation chaste. In June, the Department of Health and Human Services published a circular on funding for family planning projects for the poor. It said programmes with "extramarital abstinence education and counselling" were the highest priority.

The growing desire to remain a virgin, and the Bush government's eagerness to back programmes which would lead Americans to a biblical lifestyle, has alarmed organisations such as Planned Parenthood, and those who support sex education in schools. In a country where the teenage pregnancy rate is double that of Britain's, 35% of all school districts have replaced sex education with classes that focus solely on why not to have sex. During the last few years Planned Parenthood itself has been forced to mention abstinence as a strategy for avoiding pregnancy and disease.

For organisations such as the Silver Ring Thing, which hosts tonight's event, it is the only way. Since emerging in 1995 from Christian youth outreach programmes, Silver Ring Thing claims to have persuaded 14,000 young people to keep themselves pure until the day they wed. Since August, it has become impeccably situated to do so, after it received $700,000 (£443,000) from the US government, the largest such grant awarded.

etc.

-----

Personally I loved the 'Once you start you can't stop' bit 😛
 
Why does the mission to go to the moon only get ONE billion dollars while promotion of an act that people *already* do anyway gets a billion and a half?

Someone's priorities are *totally* screwed up.

Jason
 
"'You don't realise what you are doing until everything has changed,' says 16-year-old John Wagster, peering earnestly through round glasses as he explains his decision to embrace chastity. 'You are having oral sex, and you don't realise it's wrong. It's like eating Pringles. Once you start, you can't stop.'"

Hahahahaha, best quote of the week! Still, while I know that personal experience is far from scientific proof, in my life I've seen a lot of "no sex till marriage" from people who can't get anyone to have sex with them, and girls who profess abstinence because it's the proper thing for a girl to say and not seem slutty...and then have plenty of sex with their boyfriends. I really wouldn't voluntarily reported stats for something like this.
 
This is a subtrefuge. It's a well known fact that 22.4% of Republicans are too dumb to breed and a whopping 31.7% are too repressed to breed. This is a spending scheme touted to help the poor, but actually 98% of the money is being spent in the midwest and south.
 
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: phillyTIM
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
It's about Big Governmnet and Big spending on everything and we must be happy about it, aren't you? 😕
Isn't it funny how Republicans are known for cutting down government size and breadthe, yet George just bloats it all up over the top?

George must be polish. lol 😉 (btw: I'm polish, so i can say that, before anyone chides me for it!)

Originally posted by: phillyTIM
how much is the national debt now?

and how much have we wasted upon bush's iraqi adventure that got thousands of innocent iraqis and americans killed?

Well...well...well...

I shall remember these when we look at budget cuts. If you are soooooo concerned about spending and the size of debt - I hope you are prepared to see spending cut. I better not hear any whining out of you.
Or was it all just partisan yapping?

CkG



So are you saying that you are in favor of this plan by Bush to spend 1.5 Billion dollars that we don't have right now on "Promoting Marriage" ? The same can be applied to you if you are for Bush's big spending projects like this one and others that are a waste of money or are selling out U.S. workers, etc.... Especially when some lib calls for something just a frivolous. If you are claiming to be a true conservative then you should be ashamed and appalled by this administration's big budget spending programs/schemes and liberal foreign affair program that promotes nation building abroad but not at home where it's needed the most. Of course we all know that Bush and the neo-con's he surrounds himself with are not true conservatives when it comes to economic issues, foreign affairs or civil liberties. Take a look at Gores 2000 campaign speeches and debates against Bush and you quickly see that everything the Gore proposed ( save for the tax cuts and the striping away of civil liberties ) Bush has adopted in one way or another to the point of making of it being somewhat sad and disturbing for any true conservative.
 
Originally posted by: Drift3r
So are you saying that you are in favor of this plan by Bush to spend 1.5 Billion dollars that we don't have right now on "Promoting Marriage" ? The same can be applied to you if you are for Bush's big spending projects like this one and others that are a waste of money or are selling out U.S. workers, etc.... Especially when some lib calls for something just a frivolous. If you are claiming to be a true conservative then you should be ashamed and appalled by this administration's big budget spending programs/schemes and liberal foreign affair program that promotes nation building abroad but not at home where it's needed the most. Of course we all know that Bush and the neo-con's he surrounds himself with are not true conservatives when it comes to economic issues, foreign affairs or civil liberties. Take a look at Gores 2000 campaign speeches and debates against Bush and you quickly see that everything the Gore proposed ( save for the tax cuts and the striping away of civil liberties ) Bush has adopted in one way or another to the point of making of it being somewhat sad and disturbing for any true conservative.

I guess you forgot to read the thread.

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
No - I haven't spoken on the subject perse. I have not fully read the proposal and am waiting until I see what it entails before giving my opinion on it. Seems like others here wish to play the knee-jerk headline games with this though. If this indeed is more worthless spending as some suggest -then it should never see a vote.

You can sit there and sputter on and on about whatever you wish, but unless you support real fiscal reform - any yapping about Bush's spending is meaningless. Are you people ready for real budget reform or are you paying it lip-service?

CkG
 
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Originally posted by: alchemize
For those who decry it a waste of money, how would $1.5 billion be better spent on lower income families?

More prisons for thier criminal children.

Don't worry, I'm sure there is already plenty of funding for more prisons.
 
Why the hell is there so much making of sex out to be bad or wrong.
Do you think it's bad or wrong ?

Where the heck they think those Republicans come from anyway,
under a rock ?
 
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Originally posted by: alchemize
For those who decry it a waste of money, how would $1.5 billion be better spent on lower income families?

More prisons for thier criminal children.

Don't worry, I'm sure there is already plenty of funding for more prisons.

And plenty of population to fill them 😉

Somewhere I heard that trailerparks and prisons were the fastest growing housing in America (who knows if it is true). They should just build them next to each other?
 
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Why the hell is there so much making of sex out to be bad or wrong.
Do you think it's bad or wrong ?

Where the heck they think those Republicans come from anyway,
under a rock ?

Before I answer that, how many men would you feel comfortable with your daughter having sex with before marriage? 1? 100? 1,000? Infinite?
 
Originally posted by: Whitling
This is a subtrefuge. It's a well known fact that 22.4% of Republicans are too dumb to breed and a whopping 31.7% are too repressed to breed. This is a spending scheme touted to help the poor, but actually 98% of the money is being spent in the midwest and south.

Whitling, as we all know there is an inverse relationship with IQ and the ability to breed 🙂 Lower the IQ, higher the ability! I've seen the case studies 😉
 
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Why the hell is there so much making of sex out to be bad or wrong.
Do you think it's bad or wrong ?

Where the heck they think those Republicans come from anyway,
under a rock ?

Before I answer that, how many men would you feel comfortable with your daughter having sex with before marriage? 1? 100? 1,000? Infinite?

If she is an adult of legal and sound mind then it would not be none of my buisness to peek into her sex life. If she is still under-age and living under my roof I would say none.

 
Originally posted by: phillyTIM
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
It's about Big Governmnet and Big spending on everything and we must be happy about it, aren't you? 😕
Isn't it funny how Republicans are known for cutting down government size and breadthe, yet George just bloats it all up over the top?

George must be polish. lol 😉 (btw: I'm polish, so i can say that, before anyone chides me for it!)

Thats the idea... make everyone think they're getting their slice of the pie, and Bush will be re-elected. Check out the senior drug benefit plan... A more contorted bill could hardly exist. It doesn't even start until 2006, afaik. But that won't stop Bush from claiming a platform of 'compassion' once again. And the funniest thing is that people will buy it.

WAKE UP AMERICA!!
 
Back
Top