• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Bush to give 'clear strategy' for Iraq

daveshel

Diamond Member
Hilarious headline on CNN. I'll be sure to tune in to watch him pull a rabbit out of his hat!

With his approval rate sinking, President Bush is set Tuesday to address the nation about his "clear strategy" in war-torn Iraq while key Democrats will look for signs the president is willing to shift some policies.

needless link
 
Hilarious. I can't wait to see the smacktard try to pronounce nuclear, or other troublesome polysyllabic words. I wonder how he will explain his tanking approval ratings. I know.. the liberal media!
 
Originally posted by: piasabird
If we dont really know what is happening in Iraq maybe cnn nbc and cbs need to get off their duff and report on it.

Is that why Cheney and Rumsfeld don't know what's going on, because they have't gotten it off of CNN etc?

 
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Genx87
I have a prediction, out in 2 years 😉

According to Rumsfeld, the insurgency could last up to 12 years.

That might be the case, however there is something larger looming on the horizon that may hatch in 2 years.
 
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Genx87
I have a prediction, out in 2 years 😉

According to Rumsfeld, the insurgency could last up to 12 years.

That might be the case, however there is something larger looming on the horizon that may hatch in 2 years.

And what's that?

China

Oh you mean the bankrupting debt cause by Bush and Co that is being financed by China. Or maybe them buying U.S. energy companies and we having little leverage to say anything about it.
 
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Genx87
I have a prediction, out in 2 years 😉

According to Rumsfeld, the insurgency could last up to 12 years.

That might be the case, however there is something larger looming on the horizon that may hatch in 2 years.

And what's that?

China

Oh you mean the bankrupting debt cause by Bush and Co that is being financed by China. Or maybe them buying U.S. energy companies and we having little leverage to say anything about it.

Bankrupting? France and Germany have higher debt/GDP in both deficit and debt.
 
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Genx87
I have a prediction, out in 2 years 😉

According to Rumsfeld, the insurgency could last up to 12 years.

That might be the case, however there is something larger looming on the horizon that may hatch in 2 years.

And what's that?

China

Oh you mean the bankrupting debt cause by Bush and Co that is being financed by China. Or maybe them buying U.S. energy companies and we having little leverage to say anything about it.

More like bringing Taiwan back under their control. Probably require many of the units we have in Iraq to deal with that threat.
 
Originally posted by: ntdz
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Genx87
I have a prediction, out in 2 years 😉

According to Rumsfeld, the insurgency could last up to 12 years.

That might be the case, however there is something larger looming on the horizon that may hatch in 2 years.

And what's that?

China

Oh you mean the bankrupting debt cause by Bush and Co that is being financed by China. Or maybe them buying U.S. energy companies and we having little leverage to say anything about it.

Bankrupting? France and Germany have higher debt/GDP in both deficit and debt.

Greenspan's even said that debt is past the point of no return.
 
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: ntdz
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Genx87
I have a prediction, out in 2 years 😉

According to Rumsfeld, the insurgency could last up to 12 years.

That might be the case, however there is something larger looming on the horizon that may hatch in 2 years.

And what's that?

China

Oh you mean the bankrupting debt cause by Bush and Co that is being financed by China. Or maybe them buying U.S. energy companies and we having little leverage to say anything about it.

Bankrupting? France and Germany have higher debt/GDP in both deficit and debt.

Greenspan's even said that debt is past the point of no return.

The debt was past the point of no return the first day our federal govt decided deficit spending was ok.

 
More like bringing Taiwan back under their control.
Probably require many of the units we have in Iraq to deal with that threat.


There is no way in hell that we will confront China over ANY dispute that they have with Taiwan.

8,000 mile logistical nightmare for troops & supplies Vs. disposable multi million Army
that's just across a small straight of water, perhaps 100 miles.

If they lost 2 million soldiers to war, they would look at it as being an inefective means of birth control.
Even this Administration isn't that dumb.

 
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
More like bringing Taiwan back under their control.
Probably require many of the units we have in Iraq to deal with that threat.


There is no way in hell that we will confront China over ANY dispute that they have with Taiwan.

8,000 mile logistical nightmare for troops & supplies Vs. disposable multi million Army
that's just across a small straight of water, perhaps 100 miles.

If they lost 2 million soldiers to war, they would look at it as being an inefective means of birth control.
Even this Administration isn't that dumb.

We will find out soon enough. We didnt stick an entire fleet down there because we thought the scenary was nice.
 
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
More like bringing Taiwan back under their control.
Probably require many of the units we have in Iraq to deal with that threat.


There is no way in hell that we will confront China over ANY dispute that they have with Taiwan.

8,000 mile logistical nightmare for troops & supplies Vs. disposable multi million Army
that's just across a small straight of water, perhaps 100 miles.

If they lost 2 million soldiers to war, they would look at it as being an inefective means of birth control.
Even this Administration isn't that dumb.

We will find out soon enough. We didnt stick an entire fleet down there because we thought the scenary was nice.
:thumbsup: There is something brewing, no doubt.
 
Back
Top