Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: HBalzer
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: HBalzer
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: HBalzer
sure....
so they used tech from clinton to navigte missles they already had which were purchase/copied from perfectly functional russian missiles. If you had bothered to read the link he only gave them chips that can widthstand radiation. Nothing more nothing less.
its not like he sold them american guidance systems, but thats what you and "news"max are trying to make it to be.
Your right when i posted the article i had never read it. However, i have since read it and if you had read more than the first paragraph you would see it was more than that.
i read the whole thing, its nothing but usely conjecture and speculation, with a extra dose of fud.
That was the first article that came up in a Google search I thought it was a well enough known fact I guess many of you have been in the dark a long time.
As WorldNetDaily reported (Link), in 1995, the Clinton administration approved the sale of GPS technology directly to a company owned by the Chinese Air Force.
omg big fvcking deal. Its not like they wouldn't have just stolen it or bought it third party of even come up witht there own variant This probably would have china china a 3 month jump tops. If Clinton did anything illegal the senate would have been all over him, afterall, they did impeach him for lying about somehting as all-important as getting a bj. The lack of senate action shows that this is a bunch of bs.
And going in another dirrection, what the problem with china having well guided nukes anyways?
EDIT: to save space
I have to admit it is hard arguing with you, it?s like trying to explain something to a 3 year old. I don?t see a problem with China have long range well guided nukes either except that they have recently threatened to use them on us.
they (a univewrsity professor if i recall, i didn't really care about the issue enough to pay attention) threatened to use them on us if WE INVADED CHINA. -Actually it was in regards to Taiwan which in case you haven?t heard America has sworn to protect and China has sworn to retake.I dare say the US would do the same thing.
And you're right, it is like explaining something to a three year old, with you being the 3 year old.[/quote] - You are so clever