• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

BUSH or CLINTON

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Sure, eliminating the tax on the corporate side would be nice but it does nothing to encourage investing. Eliminate the tax on the shareholder side and you'll end up with lots of people who were previously unwilling start to buy stocks.


Stocks =/= investment.

buying stocks is not investment. if your gonna talk about investment in new issue or in new companies sure, but buying Microsoft or IBM does not help the economy that much.
 
We could think of two others, but i can picture just these two jerkin around when it comes down to it. . .ehhh, scratch that. . .reverse it.

-STeve
 
The best solution woudl be both Hillary and Bush divoce from their respedtive marriages.

And get remarried to each other. If mergers and aquisations amongst rivals in corporate world is so common, why not politics ?

Present day US politics is looting at ts best. Why not loot together ?

Its a win win situation.

If husband does not make it, wife does. And vice versa. 😀

Also both will welcome the change .. I am sure after 20+ years of marriage.
 
Originally posted by: lupy
I'd go with Arnold over Bush.
Who's your daddy and what does he do?
He also has some experience in analytical thinking from his stint as Detective John Kimble.
 
I am Libertarian but I would vote for Bush.

Even if you hate his policies, at least Bush says what he means and is honest. I wouldn't trust the Clintons to cook dinner for me much less run a country.

 
Back
Top