Bush mocks Kerry on Lambert Field

lordtyranus

Banned
Aug 23, 2004
1,324
0
0
Bush Mocks Kerry for Lambeau Name Blunder

1 minute ago


By SCOTT LINDLAW, Associated Press Writer

GREEN BAY, Wis. - President Bush (news - web sites) could not resist a fresh opportunity to tease his opponent about fumbling the name of the Green Bay Packers' field. In fact, Bush went out of his way Saturday to create the opportunity.

After his speech, Bush made an unannounced stop across the street at Lambeau Field, home of the NFL team. Democratic candidate John Kerry (news - web sites) had flubbed the name of the Packers' venerable home field last summer, confusing Lambeau Field with Lambert Field, the name of the St. Louis Airport.

"It's nice to be here at Lambeau Field," Bush said, emphasizing the "BO" in Lambeau's second syllable.

A couple dozen Bush supporters stood in the parking lot on a cool gray day, awaiting him.

"How is everybody?" Bush asked after stepping out of his limousine.

This photo-op was carefully staged so that the name of the field was in photographers' pictures.

"We're going to flip-flop Wisconsin for you, Mr. President!" one supporter yelled. Bush, who lost the state four years ago, chuckled throughout the stop.

"I gotta get going," he told his supporters a few minutes later.

On Tuesday, as Bush was calling on locals in Wisconsin to discuss economic policies, a man blurted out: "Did you see the Packers-Dallas game?"

"I saw that, I know the Wisconsin Badgers are undefeated," Bush said, mentioning the University of Wisconsin team.

Then came the punch line. "Let me tell you what else I know. I know the Packers beat Dallas at Lambeau Field," Bush said, drawing wild cheers.

Notably absent from Bush's speeches Saturday was any mention of Osama bin Laden (news - web sites), who turned up in a videotaped message a day earlier.

White House communications director Dan Bartlett said the president did not intend to bring up the topic again, after responding sharply to a Kerry attack on Friday night. "We made our point. We had to set the record straight," he said.

Bush did repeat a standard refrain about terrorism ? one that had added resonance on Saturday.

"This will be the first presidential election since September the 11th, 2001. Americans go to the polls at a time of war, and ongoing threats unlike any we have faced before," Bush told supporters in Michigan. "The terrorists who killed thousands of innocent people are still dangerous, and they are determined."

Friday was the third straight day Bush appeared at a rally in Ohio, and he tried to wring maximum political mileage out of the stop by granting interviews to reporters from three Ohio TV stations on the morning flight to Michigan. Air Force One circled the Grand Rapids airport for an extra 15 minutes Saturday so that Bush could wrap up the question-and-answer session.

In Wisconsin, Bush framed the presidential contest as a referendum on trust.



"In less than 72 hours, the American people will be voting and the decision comes down to, who do you trust?" Bush said in Green Bay.

The "who do you trust" phrase was the same one his father used in his unsuccessful re-election bid against Bill Clinton (news - web sites) in 1992.

"I offer leadership and results for a time of threat and a time of challenge," the president said in Green Bay. "I ask for your trust, I ask for your help, I ask for your vote."

Football came up again in Minneapolis when Bush stopped there before heading to Florida.

"When it's the fourth quarter and the game is on the line, you want somebody with a cool head calling the plays," Mike Tice, head coach of the Minnesota Vikings, said in introducing the president in an arena filled with supporters waving signs that said "Believers for Bush" and "Luvya Dubya."


Football is really killing Kerry. First he throws like a 6 year old girl, then he does this. Way to Bush to stick it to him.:thumbsup:
 

tallest1

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2001
3,474
0
0
Bush: "flip flopper! Flip Flopper!"
Kerry: "Bush did this, I'll do that. This is my plan plan plan plan!"
Bin Laden: "Hi guys, I exist"
Kerry: "Bush didn't get Bin Laden, I'll get Bin Laden. This is my plan plan plan!"
Bush: "flip flopper! Flip Flopper!"
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
The only results I see are
1000+ dead American Soldiers
8000+ seriously wounded soldiers
Tons of dead Iraqis
Haliburton investigations
and
Bin Ladens Greatest Hits tour on Video
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
I find it just stunning that President Bush, of all people, would make fun of a verbal misstep by his opponent. Interestingly, I don't recall hearing Kerry make fun of President Bush's endless stream of malapropisms (though it's certainly possible I just missed it).
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: DonVito
I find it just stunning that President Bush, of all people, would make fun of a verbal misstep by his opponent. Interestingly, I don't recall hearing Kerry make fun of President Bush's endless stream of malapropisms (though it's certainly possible I just missed it).

You make a very good point, I haven't seen Kerry take advantage of Bush's seemingly endless lack of skill with the English language, and here's Bush make a big deal out of one of Kerry's handful of mistakes. Seems kind of odd, especially because I would think even his supporters would have noticed it.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
The Muddle Minded Thick Tongued Doofus from Crawford Texas making fun of Kerry misspeaking, how ironic!
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,874
10,676
147
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: DonVito
I find it just stunning that President Bush, of all people, would make fun of a verbal misstep by his opponent. Interestingly, I don't recall hearing Kerry make fun of President Bush's endless stream of malapropisms (though it's certainly possible I just missed it).

You make a very good point, I haven't seen Kerry take advantage of Bush's seemingly endless lack of skill with the English language, and here's Bush make a big deal out of one of Kerry's handful of mistakes. Seems kind of odd, especially because I would think even his supporters would have noticed it.
Kind of parallels the whole military service thing.

 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: DonVito
I find it just stunning that President Bush, of all people, would make fun of a verbal misstep by his opponent. Interestingly, I don't recall hearing Kerry make fun of President Bush's endless stream of malapropisms (though it's certainly possible I just missed it).

You make a very good point, I haven't seen Kerry take advantage of Bush's seemingly endless lack of skill with the English language, and here's Bush make a big deal out of one of Kerry's handful of mistakes. Seems kind of odd, especially because I would think even his supporters would have noticed it.
Kind of parallels the whole military service thing.

Exactly. I find it mind boggling that Bush supporters who care so much about the specifics of Kerry's military service in Vietnam don't seem to care even a little bit that Bush wasn't there at all. In a world populated with logical and rational people, the attack of Kerry's service record would have boomeranged back onto Bush so fast he'd be lucky to take Texas on Tuesday. Of course that certainly doesn't seem to be the case.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: Perknose
Kind of parallels the whole military service thing.

Very much so.

From what I've read about Karl Rove, he has a philosophy that the best way of striking at an opponent is to attack his strengths, rather than his weaknesses. In this case, although anyone with a brain who watched the debates would agree that Sen Kerry was the more effective speaker, they're going right at that factor. It's interesting, and has certainly been effective in the past.
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: Perknose
Kind of parallels the whole military service thing.

Very much so.

From what I've read about Karl Rove, he has a philosophy that the best way of striking at an opponent is to attack his strengths, rather than his weaknesses. In this case, although anyone with a brain who watched the debates would agree that Sen Kerry was the more effective speaker, they're going right at that factor. It's interesting, and has certainly been effective in the past.

It's effective for two very simple reasons.

The first is that people tend to dislike superior qualities in their opponent(s). In this case, Bush supporters watch Kerry usually talk effortlessly about whatever topic is at hand, followed by Bush stumbling over his words like he's a Junior High kid giving his first oral presentation. That eats at you after a while, the more obvious the superiority of your "enemy", the worse it is. So any little excuse to attack that strength is jumped on, because it makes you feel better. "See, Kerry's not so great at speaking after all." Deep down they know that isn't true, but being able to attack an area where Kerry so obviously beats Bush makes it SEEM like the odds are a lot more even, even when it's obvious they are not. It's like High School, where girls who couldn't find a boyfriend were horribly mean when the head cheerleader was dumped. Even though she still did a lot better overall, seeing her "fail" allowed the dateless girls to get even, if only a little bit.

The second reason is that it's hard to counter. If you attack your enemy's weak points, he can counter with his strong points. But if you attack his strong points, he has to defend those points instead of changing the subject, and he'll always be playing catch-up because the attacker got the point out there first. It bogs your opponent down arguing a point he has already "won". Like the military service debate, where we were stuck for months arguing about Kerry's service, when no matter who was right, he was still better than Bush in that department. But how many people talked about that?
 

arsbanned

Banned
Dec 12, 2003
4,853
0
0
Originally posted by: dahunan
The only results I see are
1000+ dead American Soldiers
8000+ seriously wounded soldiers
Tons of dead Iraqis
Haliburton investigations
and
Bin Ladens Greatest Hits tour on Video

:thumbsup:
You're damned right! Bush is an incompetent fool.
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,874
10,676
147
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: Perknose
Kind of parallels the whole military service thing.

Very much so.

From what I've read about Karl Rove, he has a philosophy that the best way of striking at an opponent is to attack his strengths, rather than his weaknesses. In this case, although anyone with a brain who watched the debates would agree that Sen Kerry was the more effective speaker, they're going right at that factor. It's interesting, and has certainly been effective in the past.

It's effective for two very simple reasons.

The first is that people tend to dislike superior qualities in their opponent(s). In this case, Bush supporters watch Kerry usually talk effortlessly about whatever topic is at hand, followed by Bush stumbling over his words like he's a Junior High kid giving his first oral presentation. That eats at you after a while, the more obvious the superiority of your "enemy", the worse it is. So any little excuse to attack that strength is jumped on, because it makes you feel better. "See, Kerry's not so great at speaking after all." Deep down they know that isn't true, but being able to attack an area where Kerry so obviously beats Bush makes it SEEM like the odds are a lot more even, even when it's obvious they are not. It's like High School, where girls who couldn't find a boyfriend were horribly mean when the head cheerleader was dumped. Even though she still did a lot better overall, seeing her "fail" allowed the dateless girls to get even, if only a little bit.

The second reason is that it's hard to counter. If you attack your enemy's weak points, he can counter with his strong points. But if you attack his strong points, he has to defend those points instead of changing the subject, and he'll always be playing catch-up because the attacker got the point out there first. It bogs your opponent down arguing a point he has already "won". Like the military service debate, where we were stuck for months arguing about Kerry's service, when no matter who was right, he was still better than Bush in that department. But how many people talked about that?

:thumbsup: to both of you!
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Originally posted by: tallest1
Bush: "flip flopper! Flip Flopper!"
Kerry: "Bush did this, I'll do that. This is my plan plan plan plan!"
Bin Laden: "Hi guys, I exist"
Kerry: "Bush didn't get Bin Laden, I'll get Bin Laden. This is my plan plan plan!"
Bush: "flip flopper! Flip Flopper!"
Saddam: "i really wish i actually had WMDs"

fixed.
 

lordtyranus

Banned
Aug 23, 2004
1,324
0
0
Originally posted by: DonVito
I find it just stunning that President Bush, of all people, would make fun of a verbal misstep by his opponent. Interestingly, I don't recall hearing Kerry make fun of President Bush's endless stream of malapropisms (though it's certainly possible I just missed it).

Bush readily admits his lack of English speaking capabilities. When will Kerry admit that he isn't a red sox fan?

And is it really a misstep, or is Kerry just stupid?
 

3chordcharlie

Diamond Member
Mar 30, 2004
9,859
1
81
Originally posted by: lordtyranus
Bush readily admits his lack of English speaking capabilities. When will Kerry admit that he isn't a red sox fan?

If this is true then he is clearly unfit to govern (and I'm NOT kidding... much).