• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Bush Lied

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: etech
I see, you have appointed yourself as the arbiter of what is the truth and what constitutes a lie. If it fits your agenda, then it's the truth. If it doesn't, it's a lie.

Got it.
During this long, laborious exercise, I have not put words in your mouth.

I am sorry for you that you cannot do the same.
 
Youjust said, about me:
If it fits your agenda, then it's the truth. If it doesn't, it's a lie.
That is an unsubstantiated personal slur. Please back it up with a fully documented presentation, or apologize.
 
Originally posted by: Perknose
Youjust said, about me:
If it fits your agenda, then it's the truth. If it doesn't, it's a lie.
That is an unsubstantiated personal slur. Please back it up with a fully documented presentation, or apologize.

I really hope you are saying this tongue in cheek...
 
Ay, carumba, etech!

I engage you in meticulous and measured debate over a long series of detailed posts.

In the end, you must revert to form, throw a fit, and hurl a baseless and ridiculous accusation:
If it fits your agenda, then it's the truth. If it doesn't, it's a lie.
. . . and then refuse to back it up or apologize.

You are a piece of work. :roll:
 
You're right Perk.

I should not have sunk to your level. I'm sorry.

"And, etech, you simply do not get, a priori, to decide what nationally sourced evidence is germane or admissable here.
"
 
Originally posted by: Perknose
Youjust said, about me:
If it fits your agenda, then it's the truth. If it doesn't, it's a lie.
That is an unsubstantiated personal slur. Please back it up with a fully documented presentation, or apologize.

Did you apoligize for THIS quote:

We understand you're pissed your Mom confiscated your magazines. Being 13 isn't easy. But posting the warning your Mom hung over your custom Speedracer bed is just a tragic cry for help, and reflects poorly on you. Now put your jammies on, douse that light, and suppress that urge to touch yourself.

Hmmmmm?
 
Originally posted by: etech
You're right Perk.

I should not have sunk to your level. I'm sorry.

"And, etech, you simply do not get, a priori, to decide what nationally sourced evidence is germane or admissable here."
Gawd. Don't know how to quit when you're behind, do you?

What, exactly, is the point you're making with that last quote of mine? It's true for you, me, everyone, and referred explicitly to the fact that (after we established that I was relying not only on Ken Lay quotes and you apologized for saying I had) that, of course, additional evidence in the form of a Ken Lay quote could not, a priori, be dismissed.

Got that?

Good.

Now, about this ridiculous ad hom accusation you made:
If it fits your agenda, then it's the truth. If it doesn't, it's a lie.
Will you PLEASE back it up or apologize?
 
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: etech
You're right Perk.

I should not have sunk to your level. I'm sorry.

"And, etech, you simply do not get, a priori, to decide what nationally sourced evidence is germane or admissable here."
Gawd. Don't know how to quit when you're behind, do you?

What, exactly, is the point you're making with that last quote of mine? It's true for you, me, everyone, and referred explicitly to the fact that (after we established that I was relying not only on Ken Lay quotes and you apologized for saying I had) that, of course, additional evidence in the form of a Ken Lay quote could not, a priori, be dismissed.

Got that?

Good.

Now, about this ridiculous ad hom accusation you made:
If it fits your agenda, then it's the truth. If it doesn't, it's a lie.
Will you PLEASE back it up or apologize?

Nope, didn't get it, but please keep trying. You're amusing.
 
Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: Perknose
Youjust said, about me:
If it fits your agenda, then it's the truth. If it doesn't, it's a lie.
That is an unsubstantiated personal slur. Please back it up with a fully documented presentation, or apologize.

Did you apoligize for THIS quote:

We understand you're pissed your Mom confiscated your magazines. Being 13 isn't easy. But posting the warning your Mom hung over your custom Speedracer bed is just a tragic cry for help, and reflects poorly on you. Now put your jammies on, douse that light, and suppress that urge to touch yourself.

Hmmmmm?
etech and I had a long, detailed, serious debate spanning two days and many posts. At the end, he just freaked out and threw a tantrum.

That thorough put down of mine you quote came in direct response to this:
<WARNING>
............. <WARNING>
............................ <WARNING>
........................................... <WARNING>


EXCESSIVE RYTHMIC ARM MOTION MAY CAUSE CHAFEING.
. . . from a wanker troll now twice banned in the last month. It came earlier in this very thread when there was NOTHING but a reasonable discussion going on and was his VERY FIRST COMMENT. He deserved what I gave him and more. Your "outrage" and "concern" are sorely misplaced, Crimson.

As for etech, his last post was just childish and non-responsive. And to think, I just spent hours treating him with the respect due a worthy adversary. In the end, he has once again shown his true colors. Schlaf gut und traume susse, meine kleine fressers.
 
No Perk, I gave you the reasoned and well thought out response that you deserved.

I like your high and mighty act though. It's better than your come fight me in the park punk act.
 
Back
Top