Bush gives muddled warning to Syria

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

LunarRay

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2003
9,993
1
76
Originally posted by: Czar
so the rule now is this

1. Declare country has wmd's
2. Invade country
3. When no wmd's are found, accuse another country have harboring them
4. Goto 1.

Manifest Destiny of the New World Order

except item #3 should be; We can't determine if we found them all (justifies the effort) then say "intel shows three camels headed into X country with what looks like WMD" That is the code for England to Quickly join the party.

 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,733
6,758
126
When I see the kind of rationalization that goes amongst the Bushytools on the forum to cover up for the truly dumb assed stuff Bush ejaculates, I become more and more confinced that the democrats best chance in 2004 is to run somebody who's completely brain dead. When dumb is in dummer's got to be better still.

Bali, I passed on the Escalade and bought the DeVille. :D
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,733
6,758
126
except item #3 should be; We can't determine if we found them all (justifies the effort) then say "intel shows three camels headed into X country with what looks like WMD" That is the code for England to Quickly join the party.
------------------------------
Mr President, some bad news, Sir. Looks like our drone took out the three wise men, camels and all.

That is bad news Rummy, were they Bactrian or Dromedary?
 

fwtong

Senior member
Feb 26, 2002
695
5
81
Originally posted by: HJD1
Originally posted by: Czar
so the rule now is this

1. Declare country has wmd's
2. Invade country
3. When no wmd's are found, accuse another country have harboring them
4. Goto 1.

Manifest Destiny of the New World Order

except item #3 should be; We can't determine if we found them all (justifies the effort) then say "intel shows three camels headed into X country with what looks like WMD" That is the code for England to Quickly join the party.


Another item needs to be added. Country's government is despotic and tyrannical and the people need liberation.
 

BaliBabyDoc

Lifer
Jan 20, 2001
10,737
0
0
Bali, I passed on the Escalade and bought the DeVille.

Dude, the DeVille's gas mileage is horrendously good compared to an Escalade. Your purchase denies good American oil and oil services companies (not to mention vile sheikdoms throughout the Middle East and tyrants in Africa) their rightful revenue. Furthermore, your DeVille shortchanges the trophosphere 4 tons of greenhouse emissions EVERY year. At least you bought a domestic . . . damn pillow-biting tree huggers have decent Americans wasting their hard earned money on vehicles that get 20mpg . . . in the city. That turncoat Ford owns Volvo and Mazda. They are somewhat redeemed in buying Jaguar and Aston Martin from our UK brothers . . . plus gas guzzling Range Rover. But don't believe the evil rumor that GM owns Saab . . . any company great enough to contemplate a 16 cylinder engine would never despoil such a reputation by building cars in Sweden.
 

HappyGamer2

Banned
Jun 12, 2000
1,441
0
0
oh brother here we go again, syria wasn't on the axis of evil list, it must be added now. might just as well add few others to, and Israel too
Iran maybe could come off, I never thought it should have been on it
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,733
6,758
126
Hehe, averaged 31mpg on the nose from the freeway entrance in Sacramento to Bridge tollgate in Hayward, about a hundred miles. Set cruise for 60 with engine screaming at 1675 RPM, sort of a fast idle.
 

Grakatt

Senior member
Feb 27, 2003
315
0
0
Well, cruiser-missiles and the likes (u.s missiles) take time to manufacture and cost mucho dinero, right?
I read somewhere a substantial amount of them had already been fired at Iraq. And perhaps some ought to be reserve.

At any rate, I couldn't care so much less about Syria to be honest. Someone needs to give Kim Maodongdong or whatever a knock on the head so he agrees to talk to many nations, not just the U.S. If I thought someone was paranoid it would have to be him.
 

T2T III

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
12,899
1
0
Daddy won the first gulf war with a better economy and he still got whooped.
Sadly, America couldn't wake up to the facts of the affairs that Bill Clinton had been having while he was the Governor of Arkansas. Then, he continued them while he was in the White House.

"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."

 

Marshallj

Platinum Member
Mar 26, 2003
2,326
0
76
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
Bush at his best courtesy of Yahoo
Asked if the charges, a regular theme in recent weeks from hard-line members of the U.S. administration, could lead to war, Bush told reporters: "I think that we believe there are chemical weapons in Syria, for example. And we will -- each situation will require a different response and, of course, we're -- first things first.

Good job of trying to perpetuate your personal beliefs about Bush. You attempt to sound objective in your posts, yet your track record clearly defines your dislike for Bush.
 

Marshallj

Platinum Member
Mar 26, 2003
2,326
0
76
Originally posted by: sMiLeYz
Great... our draft-dodging nitwit preisdent is at it again. Lets just skip UN and go straight to all-out invasion so we can avoid another charade.

Yeah, he's a nitwit, but I bet that he knows how to spell "president" correctly.

 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
Originally posted by: fwtong
Sweet, welcome state #52, Syria, to the union. After that, Iran, North Korea and France. It'll be a great day, when the US starts to take over countries on each of the continents. Let this be a lesson to other coutries: if we can forge documents that say that you have WMD, and you oppose any of our policies, we will invade, occupy and annex in the name of democracy, liberation and ridding the world of WMD.

You are either the stupidest person alive. Or a troll. I'll go with troll.
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Originally posted by: Tiles2Tech
Sadly, America couldn't wake up to the facts of the affairs that Bill Clinton had been having while he was the Governor of Arkansas. Then, he continued them while he was in the White House.

Got that right, just like they didn't wake up to the fact that Bush-lite is a draft-dodging, cocaine-snorting alcholic with a room-temperature IQ who has never accomplished anything in his life without handouts from daddy's rich friends. Nice troll.

I don't care who the president is sleeping with as long as she is a consenting adult, not an agent of another country, and not me. It's not relevent to his performance of his duties. Get over it already.

 

HappyGamer2

Banned
Jun 12, 2000
1,441
0
0
yep, I am sick of hearing slick willy had sex with a women and he was married, big deal, at least it wasn't with another man.
he has sex drive, big deal, atleast he wasn't a dryed up brain dead old fart
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
HappyGamer2, Bowfinger, and etc. :

If a man is tempted by desires of lust and acts on those desires in an immoral way, what other temptations might he indulge in? A man with great power but no morals is very dangerous - much more so than a "fool" with morals.

CkG
 

Alistar7

Lifer
May 13, 2002
11,978
0
0
so much ignorance, so little time.

First and foremost Syria's WMD program is well known, they even offered to dismantle everything in 1999 if Israel would agree to eliminate their nuclear aresnal. Their WMD program, much like Iraq was provided primarily by EUROPEAN countries, in Iraq a total of 21 companies were involved, 19 in EU, 2 in the US. If you doubt those figures too bad, they are the ones supplied to the UN by SADDAM. Go tell him he doesn't know what he's talking about. Does anyone have the nerve to suggest Syria is not a haven for Hezbollah or PLO operatives?

For those who feel Iran should not be on the axis of evil you need to do a quick search or two on their connections to terrorism as well. They have extended an olive branch to the US though and will not be a problem, just as NK has done recently.

Gotta love the anti-US, anti-Bush trolls though, no facts ever change their BIAS, they are almost as fundamental as terrorists themselves, certainly as logical...

They cling to A FEW dissenting countries, only doing so to protect their financial interests and complicity in skirting UN resolutions they signed and dirty deals with Saddam, as if that means they are somehow right. Go to France, where the media is controlled by the Govt., then you can hear everday that everything you THINK is fact......
 

AbsolutDealage

Platinum Member
Dec 20, 2002
2,675
0
0
Originally posted by: phillyTIM
Bush had better just quit now while he's ahead.

He's gonna get himself into a place where he can't backout of, just as he did with sending all that military stuff so quickly to attack Iraq.

I don't think he's gonna even be ahead on this for long, as people will realize what premise brought us to this invasion, and it turned out to be false.

I suggest Bush return to Texas and execute himself.

Better yet, have him dig out Saddam and have Saddam come over to Texas and pull the execution lever; that would be a fitting retribution to all the pain and anguish and murder of Iraqi people and destruction of their land.

are you high? Seriously, I mean.... have you read anything? Take a look at what Saddam has done to his own people for the last 30 years and then come back and try and spout off about how Bush is such a murderer/tyrant/etc. ugh....
 

Alistar7

Lifer
May 13, 2002
11,978
0
0
Just do a quick search for his name in this forum, you will see he has major problems with Bush.
 

Purgatory-Z

Senior member
Jan 17, 2000
270
0
0
Originally posted by: phillyTIM
Bush had better just quit now while he's ahead.

He's gonna get himself into a place where he can't backout of, just as he did with sending all that military stuff so quickly to attack Iraq.

I don't think he's gonna even be ahead on this for long, as people will realize what premise brought us to this invasion, and it turned out to be false.

I suggest Bush return to Texas and execute himself.

Better yet, have him dig out Saddam and have Saddam come over to Texas and pull the execution lever; that would be a fitting retribution to all the pain and anguish and murder of Iraqi people and destruction of their land.

While there are many blatantly ignorant and generally stupid posts (mine included) in this thread, I think the above takes the cake. That's a big
rolleye.gif
for you buddy!

 

Martin

Lifer
Jan 15, 2000
29,178
1
81
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
Bush at his best courtesy of Yahoo
Asked if the charges, a regular theme in recent weeks from hard-line members of the U.S. administration, could lead to war, Bush told reporters: "I think that we believe there are chemical weapons in Syria, for example. And we will -- each situation will require a different response and, of course, we're -- first things first.

Anybody got a link to an english translation? I'don't speak/read Moron.

 

Alistar7

Lifer
May 13, 2002
11,978
0
0
Originally posted by: MartyTheManiak
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
Bush at his best courtesy of Yahoo
Asked if the charges, a regular theme in recent weeks from hard-line members of the U.S. administration, could lead to war, Bush told reporters: "I think that we believe there are chemical weapons in Syria, for example. And we will -- each situation will require a different response and, of course, we're -- first things first.

Anybody got a link to an english translation? I'don't speak/read Moron.


Me either, otherwise I would have translated all of your posts already...;)

cmon Marty I know we don't agree, but you're much smarter than that, you left your flank wide open with that one, was it a trap? lol

Bush might be better off just holding up the cue cards, he is a horrible speaker.
 

yowolabi

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2001
4,183
2
81
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
HappyGamer2, Bowfinger, and etc. :

If a man is tempted by desires of lust and acts on those desires in an immoral way, what other temptations might he indulge in? A man with great power but no morals is very dangerous - much more so than a "fool" with morals.

CkG

Except you can't read or predict people that way. Because someone will steal, does that mean he will kill? Because someone stole, that doesn't even mean that he will steal again. You can't predict people like that. Bush used cocaine. Does that mean he would use it now? Does that mean he has no morals? You can't take one act and pretend you know someone or extrapolate that act into things that are unrelated.

To say that because a person will indulge in a sexual act, that means he'll do something dangerous is wrong. Besides, we was there for 8 years and didn't indulge in dangerous acts. Things were good, and if you can't prove that he was responsible for the good times, you can at least show that he didn't hurt anything which is more of an achievement these days then it should be.

The reason why I have more issues with Bush than Clinton is because I judge people on the acts that make a difference in my life. I don't care that much that Bush is an idiot. I laugh at those jokes like I laughed at the Clinton sex maniac jokes. I do care about the actions you take that represent me and my country. If I think that your lack of intelligence causes you to be a poor diplomat and creates enemies, then I'm going to have problems with you. I haven't seen anything about how Clinton's acts hurt anyone other than himself.