Bush Could Have Killed Zarqawi in 2002

[Zebo]

Link

 

[smashp]

"People were more obsessed with developing the coalition to overthrow Saddam than to execute the president?s policy of pre-emption against terrorists."

Id Say that sums it up. The President was also one of the "People"

 

[dahunan]

"he tried to kill my daddy.. I gonna get revenge on him and kill 10,000 of his people ... " Oh.. and take some of tha mutha fvcking oil while I am at it too b!tch"

 

[Passions]

Originally posted by: dahunan
"he tried to kill my daddy.. I gonna get revenge on him and kill 10,000 of his people ... " Oh.. and take some of tha mutha fvcking oil while I am at it too b!tch"

Hushhhh....................

 

[DanJ]

Great.

 

[TravisT]

With Tuesday?s attacks, Abu Musab Zarqawi, a Jordanian militant with ties to al-Qaida, is now blamed for more than 700 terrorist killings in Iraq.

I forgot, Iraq doesn't have any ties to terrorism.

Also, you chose not to include this part:

The United States did attack the camp at Kirma at the beginning of the war, but it was too late ? Zarqawi and many of his followers were gone.

Good try, but you failed miserably and just helped my points in other threads. Thanks for this great find.

 

[dahunan]

Originally posted by: TravisT

With Tuesday?s attacks, Abu Musab Zarqawi, a Jordanian militant with ties to al-Qaida, is now blamed for more than 700 terrorist killings in Iraq.

I forgot, Iraq doesn't have any ties to terrorism.

Also, you chose not to include this part:

The United States did attack the camp at Kirma at the beginning of the war, but it was too late ? Zarqawi and many of his followers were gone.

Good try, but you failed miserably and just helped my points in other threads. Thanks for this great find.

WTF are you trying to say?

look
A "jordanian" --- killed people IN Iraq...

 

[TravisT]

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: TravisT

With Tuesday?s attacks, Abu Musab Zarqawi, a Jordanian militant with ties to al-Qaida, is now blamed for more than 700 terrorist killings in Iraq.

I forgot, Iraq doesn't have any ties to terrorism.

Also, you chose not to include this part:

The United States did attack the camp at Kirma at the beginning of the war, but it was too late ? Zarqawi and many of his followers were gone.

Good try, but you failed miserably and just helped my points in other threads. Thanks for this great find.

WTF are you trying to say?

look
A "jordanian" --- killed people IN Iraq...

Exactly. He setup a camp IN Iraq devoted directly towards terrorism. So, what exactly is your point? I'm glad to know he's of Jordanian decent, but to me, that means very little considering his camp was in Iraq, not anywhere else.

 

[smashp]

Originally posted by: TravisT

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: TravisT

With Tuesday?s attacks, Abu Musab Zarqawi, a Jordanian militant with ties to al-Qaida, is now blamed for more than 700 terrorist killings in Iraq.

I forgot, Iraq doesn't have any ties to terrorism.

Also, you chose not to include this part:

The United States did attack the camp at Kirma at the beginning of the war, but it was too late ? Zarqawi and many of his followers were gone.

Good try, but you failed miserably and just helped my points in other threads. Thanks for this great find.

WTF are you trying to say?

look
A "jordanian" --- killed people IN Iraq...

Exactly. He setup a camp IN Iraq devoted directly towards terrorism. So, what exactly is your point? I'm glad to know he's of Jordanian decent, but to me, that means very little considering his camp was in Iraq, not anywhere else.

The Point you are missing is he set up camp in NORHTERN Kurdish Iraq. Saddam Had no or Very limited power here thanks to the no-fly Zones and the Area was mostly ruled by kurdish tribes for the previous five Years. The Attack on the base would have been easy to politically and militarily because we were Already stricking targets within the Are that violated No-fly rules.

 

[conjur]

That camp is nothing new.

It was in Kurdish territory, protected by the U.S.'s No-Fly zone and it was out of the control of Saddam. So, any attempts you may now make at linking Saddam with Al Qaeda are still false.

 

[dahunan]

Originally posted by: TravisT

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: TravisT

With Tuesday?s attacks, Abu Musab Zarqawi, a Jordanian militant with ties to al-Qaida, is now blamed for more than 700 terrorist killings in Iraq.

I forgot, Iraq doesn't have any ties to terrorism.

Also, you chose not to include this part:

The United States did attack the camp at Kirma at the beginning of the war, but it was too late ? Zarqawi and many of his followers were gone.

Good try, but you failed miserably and just helped my points in other threads. Thanks for this great find.

WTF are you trying to say?

look
A "jordanian" --- killed people IN Iraq...

Exactly. He setup a camp IN Iraq devoted directly towards terrorism. So, what exactly is your point? I'm glad to know he's of Jordanian decent, but to me, that means very little considering his camp was in Iraq, not anywhere else.

You are confusing...

SO.. let me see... Iraqi Sponsored Terrorism AGAINST IRAQIS?? You think the Iraqis paid to have terrorists murder their own people?/ Is that what you are excited about? You think that implicates Saddam as an al-qaeda fundraiser/supporter?

 

[TravisT]

I agree, i'm not arguing the fact that it would have been easy to take it out earlier. Not sure why they didn't, not even going to touch on that issue.

My point in other threads is that fighting in Iraq now is part of the war on Terrorism. No longer is it just about taking Saddam out of power since he's already in our custody nor did I ever assume that was all it was about.

And killing this 'TERRORIST camp' was part of it. Who knows, maybe in attacking that camp and hopefully getting another shot at this terrorist will save another 700 lives and a few more Americans from being brutally killed in the manner as Berg.

I do believe that Iraqi officials knew of this camp, and it's likely that Saddam looked at this camp just as he did his other torture chambers.

Basic point in a nutshell: Iraq is full of terrorists that are killing our soldiers on a weekly basis and fighting this war in Iraq is fighting a war on terrorism.

 

[conjur]

Originally posted by: TravisT
I agree, i'm not arguing the fact that it would have been easy to take it out earlier. Not sure why they didn't, not even going to touch on that issue.

My point in other threads is that fighting in Iraq now is part of the war on Terrorism. No longer is it just about taking Saddam out of power since he's already in our custody nor did I ever assume that was all it was about.

And killing this 'TERRORIST camp' was part of it. Who knows, maybe in attacking that camp and hopefully getting another shot at this terrorist will save another 700 lives and a few more Americans from being brutally killed in the manner as Berg.

I do believe that Iraqi officials knew of this camp, and it's likely that Saddam looked at this camp just as he did his other torture chambers.

Basic point in a nutshell: Iraq is full of terrorists that are killing our soldiers on a weekly basis and fighting this war in Iraq is fighting a war on terrorism.

How could Saddam have "looked at this camp just as he did his other torture chambers" when it was not in an area under his control??

As for terrorism in Iraq, it wasn't there before! There were no terror attacks within Iraq...just Saddam and his thugs. The U.S. invasion drew others in and it put us as targets of terrorism.

You really should go back to ATOT where you can continue being pwn3d. You just continue to embarrass yourself here more and more.

 

[dahunan]

NO...

When we went to Iraq .. The terrorists followed us because we were NOW - EASY TARGETS...

Syria.. Jordan... Saudi Arabia - all of Iraq's neighbors are were or are terrorist sponsoring countries.. EASY borders to cross and start Killing Christian Americans.

 

[TravisT]

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: TravisT
I agree, i'm not arguing the fact that it would have been easy to take it out earlier. Not sure why they didn't, not even going to touch on that issue.

My point in other threads is that fighting in Iraq now is part of the war on Terrorism. No longer is it just about taking Saddam out of power since he's already in our custody nor did I ever assume that was all it was about.

And killing this 'TERRORIST camp' was part of it. Who knows, maybe in attacking that camp and hopefully getting another shot at this terrorist will save another 700 lives and a few more Americans from being brutally killed in the manner as Berg.

I do believe that Iraqi officials knew of this camp, and it's likely that Saddam looked at this camp just as he did his other torture chambers.

Basic point in a nutshell: Iraq is full of terrorists that are killing our soldiers on a weekly basis and fighting this war in Iraq is fighting a war on terrorism.

How could Saddam have "looked at this camp just as he did his other torture chambers" when it was not in an area under his control??

As for terrorism in Iraq, it wasn't there before! There were no terror attacks within Iraq...just Saddam and his thugs. The U.S. invasion drew others in and it put us as targets of terrorism.

You really should go back to ATOT where you can continue being pwn3d. You just continue to embarrass yourself here more and more.

Wow, so ignorant you didn't even read my point. Really, you need to get off these forums and come up with your own knowledge for once. Not only is 27,000+ posts on a computer forum sad, you really have learned nothing from being here from what i can tell.

again...

Point for Dummies (Do I need to print the yellow book for you?): Iraq is full of terrorists that are killing our soldiers on a weekly basis and fighting this war in Iraq is fighting a war on terrorism.

And this:

As for terrorism in Iraq, it wasn't there before!

LOL! wtf, you dumbass. The news just said that there was a camp where before going over to Iraq? That's right... in Iraq. That whole assumption has already been blown out of the water, so don't try to pull that garbage in here. Stop licking Kerry's sack for once and go read a little more closely.

 

[conjur]

Originally posted by: TravisT
Wow, so ignorant you didn't even read my point. Really, you need to get off these forums and come up with your own knowledge for once. Not only is 27,000+ posts on a computer forum sad, you really have learned nothing from being here from what i can tell.

Ah, you're somehow jealous of my post count which doesn't mean jacksquat to anyone else, esp. me. GET A FREAKIN' LIFE!

Point for Dummies (Do I need to print the yellow book for you?): Iraq is full of terrorists that are killing our soldiers on a weekly basis and fighting this war in Iraq is fighting a war on terrorism.

The only thing Iraq is full of is Iraqis. Yes, there are some terrorists now in Iraq but they only arrived after invasion by the U.S.

The people killing our soldiers on a weekly basis are the insurgents. The insurgents are the former Saddam Fedayeen. They are Iraqi citizens and are fighting to defend their homeland. While they may use tactics that resemble terrorism, they are not terrorists.

And this:

As for terrorism in Iraq, it wasn't there before!

LOL! wtf, you dumbass. The news just said that there was a camp where before going over to Iraq? That's right... in Iraq. That whole assumption has already been blown out of the water, so don't try to pull that garbage in here. Stop licking Kerry's sack for once and go read a little more closely.

That's a camp. They did some training there. They did not launch attacks within Iraq from there. All signs point to current terrorists in Iraq having come from outside of Iraq. A sizable Al Qaeda presence isn't even thought to be in Iraq anymore once they trained the former Fedayeen on their tactics.

Again, scamper on back to ATOT where you're less likely to injure yourself.

 

[TravisT]

Ohhh, okay, now look who's back peddling... at first, there was no terrorists there prior to the war, now, there were, they just didn't attack anyone. Riiight... you also forgot the 700 they killed. Nah... they are terrorists they didn't 'hurt' anyone.

Suggesting I leave because you obviously have no clue what you're talking about hurts my feelings.... Are you afraid I might hurt your image on these forums you have came to care about so much that you feel the need to tell people that point out your stupidity to go elsewhere?