• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Bush challenges war critics to offer own plan

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: LumbergTech
Originally posted by: Stunt
Originally posted by: RichardE
http://z.about.com/d/uspolitics/1/0/i/iraq_approval_8_2005.png

Almost 80% of the US approved going to Iraq before the war started...

You did create this mess, just because you don't have the stomach to finish it now does not mean you shouldn't.
It's like having sex with your girlfriend, finding out she's pregnant and not having the guts to follow through with the abortion (for you liberals) or get married (for you conservatives).

Sounds like a great idea at first, but the rest of it ain't so rosey 😛
uh.....why is an abortion the default choice here? its an option..im a little confused by your comparison..
Abortion is not the default choice.
There's have the kid or don't have the kid...abortion = don't have the kid.
 
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
People wanted action. It is the government's job to make sure this action makes sense. It is funny that you think "the people" are in charge of this country instead of the current administration! PATHETIC
Bush took swore this oath of office when he became President:
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.
Every member of the administration took a similar oath. The even defiled their damned bible to do it.

The American public has a right to presume they will comport themselves consistant with that oath, at least until they are proven to be liars.

What's PATHETIC is, the Bushwhackos were in control of the informaiion they fed to Congress and the public, and all they gave us was lies, lies and more lies to support their own thirst for blood and delusions of grandure, and their Republican majority in Congress made it a point to keep their heads so far up their collective asses that no amount of truth would find the light of day, let alone enough critical mass to stop the administration maniacs.
 
Lets cut to the damn chase for a change---I am in the that 20% group that did not vote for GWB--and did think that GWB was but a damn con man and an international war criminal in the making.---or at least I now so claim.

But here we are six years later---should I have 20 20 hindsight---with the courage of my pre-sight--- have obtained a gun and tried to kill GWB?---or died trying?---because I saw this coming?

Because I did not take that radical step---do I now share the common guilt of the American people for voting that ass hat into the Presidency---and twice at that? But monetarily, I get to pay my fair share of the unyet tallied bill.


THAT IS NOW THE ONLY RELEVANT QUESTION REMAINING ON THIS THREAD---HOW DO YOU GET RID OF GWB USING LEGAL MEANS BEFORE HE REALLY MAKES THINGS DRAMATICALLY WORSE THAN IT IS NOW?

And 20 20 hindsight---would the world be a better place if both GWB and Cheney had fallen victims to an assassin years ago.?
 
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
"Perhaps a big "Sorry, we shouldn't have come, good luck now".

Yes, kinda. The U.S. needs to BEG the rest of the world for help because we have lost all control. So yes, that would be a great start.

I love how you ignore the genocide that would follow. Would we just turn our eyes away from that in your grand scheme of running away?


As I said and YOU ignored... there is genocide in Darfur too.. it has been going on for a decade.. We would turn our eyes away the same way we do with Darfur. What do you not get?

No we wouldn't. The american people are sympathizers overall. We did not cause the situation in Darfur, but we did in Iraq. No media outlet would ever let you forget that and it would destroy political careers. So again, what is your plan for dealing with that.
 
Originally posted by: Lemon law
Lets cut to the damn chase for a change---I am in the that 20% group that did not vote for GWB--and did think that GWB was but a damn con man and an international war criminal in the making.---or at least I now so claim.

But here we are six years later---should I have 20 20 hindsight---with the courage of my pre-sight--- have obtained a gun and tried to kill GWB?---or died trying?---because I saw this coming?

Because I did not take that radical step---do I now share the common guilt of the American people for voting that ass hat into the Presidency---and twice at that? But monetarily, I get to pay my fair share of the unyet tallied bill.


THAT IS NOW THE ONLY RELEVANT QUESTION REMAINING ON THIS THREAD---HOW DO YOU GET RID OF GWB USING LEGAL MEANS BEFORE HE REALLY MAKES THINGS DRAMATICALLY WORSE THAN IT IS NOW?

And 20 20 hindsight---would the world be a better place if both GWB and Cheney had fallen victims to an assassin years ago.?

There is no way to know till some time down the road. Its hard to judge history when you are living it.
 
I've heard tons of plans as this disaster has unfolded...from Biden's divide Iraq scenario all the way to Kucinich 's leave yesterday plan. Someone's not listening..
 
Bush himself has a plan?!? Well, color me astonished. I thought we were looking at more of the same -- two more years of "Stay-the-Course Episode II: The Empire Surges Back."
 
what part of the ISG Report is so hard to understand?

the plan is laid out....yet boneheads seem to ignore it.
 
Originally posted by: randym431
From MSNBC


This really burns me when I hear this from the right wingers, and now Bush himself.
Hey jerk! WE THE PEOPLE did not get us into this Iraq mess. Would never had, would never have been that stupid in the first place. So WE THE PEOPLE don't have to have a plan.

Bush... oh man. No term or insult can begin to fit this disaster in progress.


We the people (Democrats and Republicans) voted for the war, when the going got tough the Democrats decided that giving Iraq a few more resolutions might have been the best bet.
 
The solution is to leave, immediately. We can stay and lose, or we can leave and lose. We're not winning anything.
 
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: ntdz
Originally posted by: randym431
From MSNBC


This really burns me when I hear this from the right wingers, and now Bush himself.
Hey jerk! WE THE PEOPLE did not get us into this Iraq mess. Would never had, would never have been that stupid in the first place. So WE THE PEOPLE don't have to have a plan.

Bush... oh man. No term or insult can begin to fit this disaster in progress.

If you're going to sit here and criticize the plan, you damn well better have another idea that doesn't involve us admitting defeat and leaving. It really "burns me" when Democrats oppose everything for the sake of opposing it and don't offer up a better idea.


"f you're going to sit here and criticize the plan, you damn well better have another idea "

Says you. If we didn't create the mess and say to leave now and cut our losses. Who are you to say we can't?

Last I checked, the war in Iraq wasn't just a problem for Republicans, it's a problem for all Americans, whether you like it or not. It doesn't matter if "you" didn't create the mess, and it doesn't mean that just pulling all the troops out is a plan. It's not, it's surrender and will, without question, create a significantly bigger mess.
 
To ntdz,

Who correctly points out---Last I checked, the war in Iraq wasn't just a problem for Republicans, it's a problem for all Americans, whether you like it or not. It doesn't matter if "you" didn't create the mess, and it doesn't mean that just pulling all the troops out is a plan. It's not, it's surrender and will, without question, create a significantly bigger mess.

Well you have it half right---at least you understand its now an American problem---or better stated a world problem of grave risk-------at this point an American pull out COULD well cause a series of events leading up to a very large mid-east war that will in turn cut of much of the worlds oil supply resulting in a world wide depression as most of the world's economies, including ours grind to a halt.
But lets just accept your more compact "will without question create a significantly bigger mess."

Thats the easy half----now the hard half is selling A LONG HARD PLAN THAT WILL STABALIZE IRAQ
to the American people.--------------------its time to understand GWB&co. is still selling a more of the same military plan that will not solve a political problem.---and this will waste at least six months and further divide the nation.

The delusional trap we all suffer from is that we have an infinite amount of time---and as long as we do not leave your significantly bigger mess will not happen. But as events move---one day very soon
its going to reach some tipping point and a larger full blown Iraqi civil war is going to happen anyway.--------triggering that bigger mess.
 
Originally posted by: ntdz
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: ntdz
Originally posted by: randym431
From MSNBC


This really burns me when I hear this from the right wingers, and now Bush himself.
Hey jerk! WE THE PEOPLE did not get us into this Iraq mess. Would never had, would never have been that stupid in the first place. So WE THE PEOPLE don't have to have a plan.

Bush... oh man. No term or insult can begin to fit this disaster in progress.

If you're going to sit here and criticize the plan, you damn well better have another idea that doesn't involve us admitting defeat and leaving. It really "burns me" when Democrats oppose everything for the sake of opposing it and don't offer up a better idea.


"f you're going to sit here and criticize the plan, you damn well better have another idea "

Says you. If we didn't create the mess and say to leave now and cut our losses. Who are you to say we can't?

Last I checked, the war in Iraq wasn't just a problem for Republicans, it's a problem for all Americans, whether you like it or not. It doesn't matter if "you" didn't create the mess, and it doesn't mean that just pulling all the troops out is a plan. It's not, it's surrender and will, without question, create a significantly bigger mess.

"it doesn't mean that just pulling all the troops out is a plan."

It doesn't mean it isn't a plan because you say so.
 
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: slash196
The solution is to leave, immediately. We can stay and lose, or we can leave and lose. We're not winning anything.





Are you French?


If I am french, you have got to be one of those nutjobs who thought that bombing North Vietnam to the table was somehow going to win the war.

If it weren't for just pulling out of Vietnam we'd still be in there sending our boys into the meat grinder. And for what?

This war is a lost cause, enacted by a criminal through lies and deceit for the purpose of entitlement of the rich. It is doing nothing but killing soldiers, mortgaging our future, and destroying a country.


 
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: RichardE
No Harvey, I'm sorry. The US was bloodthirsty because 9/11 was still in its mind.
Speak for yourself. I was never that stupid, and neither were most of my friends and others I respect.
I have to agree with RichardE on this point. The reason most americans supported the invasion was to get revenge. The wmd stuff was all a lie but it was also just a convenient rationalization to justify the war for most americans.

I was against the war from the start though.
 
Originally posted by: Zebo
I've heard tons of plans as this disaster has unfolded...from Biden's divide Iraq scenario all the way to Kucinich 's leave yesterday plan. Someone's not listening..

This is absolutely correct. Any "plan" that doesn't meet what he's already got his mind set on will be labeled as one of the following:

1) un-patriotic
2) cut and run
3) "group x that came up with plan" hates the troops and the sacrifices they've made

I submit that W is the one that actually has no regard whatsoever for our troops.

1) He can't identify with them in any way, shape, or form since he (or daddy) did everything posssible to keep the boy king as far away as possible from vietnam.

Joke: What's the difference between Iraq and Vietnam? A: Bush knew how to get out of vietnam!

2) He constantly ignores the advice of people that actually have military experience (Shinseki, etc) on Iraq. No one thinks this "surge" will solve the problem in Iraq. It's purely a political CYA move to keep the meatgrinder going until January 2009. Using troops as a sacrifice to save your own ass is probably the worst thing this douche bag has ever done, and that list isn't exactly short either.


At this point, the best thing for everyone is to get the drunk driver out from behind the wheel.

/rant


Edit:

Next time I do something stupid against all advice from knowledgable sources, I expect someone else to bail my ass out too. If its good enough for the role model president, I should do it too.
 
Originally posted by: zephyrprime
The problem is, it cannot be fixed.

There is no way to fix Iraq.

No amount of money of manpower from the US will solve the problem. Iraq is an artificial country that only exists because Britain drew some lines on a map once upon a time. Iraq is only doing what is natural now and separating into 3 pieces. The problem is, the factions are fighting to control the oil and people living on the wrong side of town are now being persecuted. I think the key to understanding what's happening in Iraq for americans is to realize that the Iraqis are huge religious bigots and having a religious war. The Sunni want to dominate and take revenge on the Shia for past wrongs done to them. They only want peace through victory over the Shia. That is why the PM in Iraq has not gone along with Bushes urges to quell sectarian strife. The PM is the sectarian in chief in Iraq.

The best thing for the US to do is to accelerate the split and make sure the death toll is as low as possible. But I'm not sure this would even work since this would basically mean discarding the current Iraqi government. That would not go over well in Iraq.

QTMFT!!!!!
 
Originally posted by: shadow9d9

That is the outcome when you start a war without any idea what the heck you are doing. Now we all must live with the consequences. What do you people not get about cause and effect here? If you do something dumb, you get your ass kicked. There isn't always a "solution".

QFT

Exactly, there isn't always a solution. If there is one it definately isn't a military one (short of just killing everyone in the country and repopulating it). The problem is you got different religious groups that have deep problems with each other (I am gonna try to get around to reading up on what their differences are). This is not gonna change until their thought processes evolve and who knows how long that is gonna take.
 
The striking thing about this administration right now is not that it is weak or unpopular but that it has ceased to be relevant. I do not doubt that there are a handful of deluded zealots still casting about but I do not think the institutions that do the heavy lifting are going to go for any more adventures. I have some concern that problems with Iran might escalate without planning but I think it far more likely that most powers in the administration are looking at how they will survive and have influence after 2008.

All that seems left is the spinning of who is responsible. The "surge" is not a new strategy, it is a minor tactical move designed to forestall the day of reckoning (in hope of a miracle) and lay the groundwork for the argument (McCain's approach in the election) that we would have won if only we had REALLY made an effort. Its not about Democratic opposition so much as it is GOPers distancing themselves from the trainwreck. The political philosophy of CYA is a powerful brake on wreckless behavior.
 
Originally posted by: zephyrprime
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: RichardE
No Harvey, I'm sorry. The US was bloodthirsty because 9/11 was still in its mind.
Speak for yourself. I was never that stupid, and neither were most of my friends and others I respect.
I have to agree with RichardE on this point. The reason most americans supported the invasion was to get revenge. The wmd stuff was all a lie but it was also just a convenient rationalization to justify the war for most americans.

I was against the war from the start though.

Who were these people who wanted revenge in Iraq? Not me, everybody I know thought we should know the hell out of Afghanistan and get Osama. Iraq wasn't even in my mind.

 
hey dumbya, you broke it, you fix it. Plenty of very qualified people have tried to guide you along, even daddy, but your head is so far up your ass you can't hear them clearly. And when you took the time from cutting brush to actually get past your ADD and listen (not comprehend, it wasn't Where's Waldo) to the reports, it didn't jive with your stay the course mentality so it was unpatriotic, not the plan for a winning strategy, not a strategy you could win with (since he decides to switch words around in a sentence and pretend it's a whole new idea, why not..), and by winning we mean not losing, he'll gladly put your sons and daughters in harms way, but his own tequila twins? no freaking way, they're far to busy raising their blood alcohol level.
I've had it with this idiot boy-who-would-be-king.
 
Originally posted by: Stunt
Originally posted by: RichardE
http://z.about.com/d/uspolitics/1/0/i/iraq_approval_8_2005.png

Almost 80% of the US approved going to Iraq before the war started...

You did create this mess, just because you don't have the stomach to finish it now does not mean you shouldn't.
It's like having sex with your girlfriend, finding out she's pregnant and not having the guts to follow through with the abortion (for you liberals) or get married (for you conservatives).

Sounds like a great idea at first, but the rest of it ain't so rosey 😛

You're analogy is incredibly false. The war in Iraq was more analogous to you having sex with your girlfriend under the impression that she was on birth control. Then you learn she's pregnant and you find out that she wasn't on birth control at all.

Sounds like a great idea when you're presented with false information.
 
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: slash196
The solution is to leave, immediately. We can stay and lose, or we can leave and lose. We're not winning anything.





Are you French?


If I am french, you have got to be one of those nutjobs who thought that bombing North Vietnam to the table was somehow going to win the war.

If it weren't for just pulling out of Vietnam we'd still be in there sending our boys into the meat grinder. And for what?

This war is a lost cause, enacted by a criminal through lies and deceit for the purpose of entitlement of the rich. It is doing nothing but killing soldiers, mortgaging our future, and destroying a country.

The only reason we didn't win that war is because the Democrats and the media, does that sound familiar?

 
Back
Top