• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Bush cabal arrested where to try them?

Steeplerot

Steeplerot

Lifer
So say the more *ahem* uninformed segment of the population realizes what has been going on and we get him and his buddies in cuffs finally.
Should Bush and co. be tried by US courts by the US people or Geneva Convention?
I can think of some interesting dual-trials with him and Saddam getting tried by Iraqis. At the same time they could testify against Bush and Co.

Or
Maybe bring him down to Texas and toss him in that hole of a pen in Texas he loved to put so many people to death in? I'm not saying to actually put him to death (just scare him a little) then bring him and his buddies
(Enron buddies) to Cali so we can straighten out the scam he pulled on our energy.

What would you like to see Bush strung up for and serve some time?
What wrong has he done to your state, city, family, loved ones you would like to see him accountable for?
And would it a UN court or US for the actions he has taken?

---

I do not object to your premise. I object to your trolling attitude.

If you are serious the issues you raise, and you want to discuss them, start by listing any crimes you believe the President and his administration have committed, including documentation, and discuss your points in a reasonable way. This tread is not it.

AnandTech Moderator
 
First we need to determine which crime he has comitted. Maybe you can inform us what law he broke?

btw the US does not recognize the world court so if any crime was actually comitted he would be tried in a US court.

Dont wet yourself in excitement though as I am sure you charges are frivilous at best.
 
Originally posted by: steeplerot
So say the more *ahem* uninformed segment of the population realizes what has been going on and we get him and his buddies in cuffs finally.
Should Bush and co. be tried by US courts by the US people or Geneva Convention?
I can think of some interesting dual-trials with him and Saddam getting tried by Iraqis. At the same time they could testify against Bush and Co.

Or
Maybe bring him down to Texas and toss him in that hole of a pen in Texas he loved to put so many people to death in? I'm not saying to actually put him to death (just scare him a little) then bring him and his buddies
(Enron buddies) to Cali so we can straighten out the scam he pulled on our energy.

What would you like to see Bush strung up for and serve some time?
What wrong has he done to your state, city, family, loved ones you would like to see him accountable for?
And would it a UN court or US for the actions he has taken?
Click to expand...

I think its about time we use the label TROLL with you steeplerot.. it fits.
 
Go jump off a cliff, this is not a troll nor were my statements about raygun just becasue some mod was crying about propaganda and did not like my opinion does not make me a troll.
If you do not think he should be tried for his crimes post in another thread.
 
Originally posted by: steeplerot
Go jump off a cliff, this is not a troll nor were my statements about raygun just becasue some mod was crying about propaganda and did not like my opinion does not make me a troll.
If you do not think he should be tried for his crimes post in another thread.
Click to expand...

Troll. Troll. Troll.

OK, we'll play along for a minute, little nader troll boy.

Please list the crimes (and by crimes, please list the specific statute(s) he has violated) national or international. Otherwise, you are just a troll troll trolling your boat.
 
And then once you've listed the alleged crimes and their respective statutes, then we'll examine the permissable sentences. None of which I believe would be in your first trolling.

Or if you can't find these crimes, then maybe *ahem* you aren't as informed as you think.

Lastly, when you say "and Co.", could you be more specific with the 2 above mentioned posts? I don't believe any court will try "and Co.".
 
Profiteering,genocide, crimes against humanity, doing his dog I do not care which issue irks you I am asking how we deal with it when justice is due, like I said go post elsewhere if you do not wish to discuss the topic. This does affect you obviously until you wake up.
Call me a troll all you like.
here you want to argue about your bushy-boi go argue in the bush lied thread
http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.cfm?catid=52&threadid=1331678&enterthread=y
 
Originally posted by: steeplerot
Profiteering,genocide, crimes against humanity, doing his dog I do not care which issue irks you I am asking how we deal with it when justice is due, like I said go post elsewhere if you do not wish to discuss the topic. This does affect you obviously until you wake up.
Call me a troll all you like.
here you want to argue about your bushy-boi go argue in the bush lied thread
http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.cfm?catid=52&threadid=1331678&enterthread=y
Click to expand...

Can you point out one single "lie" on there and a relevant statute that is illegal? I'm perfectly on topic. The topic is where should "Bush & co." be tried. I'm asking for what crimes, specifically. We aren't talking about lies, not all lies are crimes, not all crimes involve lies. I need to know what crimes he'll be tried before before we determine jurisdiction (that's a big word for you, I know).

Otherwise, you are just trolling and this thread should be locked and you should be banned again.
 
Genx87 is right. The US does not recognize any international court. Special tribunals have been set up to deal with individual cases but this does not constitute an international court. What particular crimes are you refering to. I think Bush is a terrible president and I dont think he should have done the things he has but I dont know what crimes you think he can/should be charged with. As it is, the answer to your question is it falls squarely within the jurisdiction of the US courts.

Billy
 
The thread does not ask why it asks where. so go troll someone elses thread. I am not intrested in getting in a endless loop with you.
There is no arguing with you dittoheads since you deny fact over and over in a attempt to justify supporting the current regime in power.
bush is a criminal in many peoples minds maybe not yours but this is not the question you are not a mod either.
go defend your ideas of bush's innocence in the proper thread.
 
Originally posted by: steeplerot
The thread does not ask why it asks where. so go troll someone elses thread. I am not intrested in getting in a endless loop with you.
There is no arguing with you dittoheads since you deny fact over and over in a attempt to justify supporting the current regime in power.
bush is a criminal in many peoples minds maybe not yours but this is not the question you are not a mod either.
go defend your ideas of bush's innocence in the proper thread.
Click to expand...

Well, if there aren't any "crimes" to try him for then how can anyone answer your question? You claim there are "crimes" yet can't seem to post them.

Oh, and just because I got a new shipment in...

*cookie*

😀
CkG
 
Oh boy now Mr. Bleat & run is here... So much for asking a question that steps out of the P&N status quo of vanilla black and white backbiting drivel....
 
fine,
*feeds troll bait*
IF YOU ARE OF THE OPINION THAT BUSH DID NO WRONG YOUR OPINION OBVIOUSLY IS NOT APPLICABLE TO THE QUESTION
 
Originally posted by: steeplerot
The thread does not ask why it asks where. so go troll someone elses thread. I am not intrested in getting in a endless loop with you.
There is no arguing with you dittoheads since you deny fact over and over in a attempt to justify supporting the current regime in power.
bush is a criminal in many peoples minds maybe not yours but this is not the question you are not a mod either.
go defend your ideas of bush's innocence in the proper thread.
Click to expand...

I"m perfectly willing to discuss the premise of your thread, if it isn't a troll. Your questions are quite simple:

1.
Should Bush and co. be tried by US courts by the US people or Geneva Convention?
Click to expand...
I can only answer this question if we define what crimes you feel he has comitted, since that's how you determine jurisdiction.

2.
Maybe bring him down to Texas and toss him in that hole of a pen in Texas he loved to put so many people to death in?
Click to expand...
Here we move to sentencing. We can't know the sentence, unless we know the crime, and the jurisdiction.

3.
What would you like to see Bush strung up for and serve some time?
Click to expand...
See #2

4.
What wrong has he done to your state, city, family, loved ones you would like to see him accountable for?
Click to expand...
Ah, an opinion question. Absolutely nothing wrong, therefore nothing held accountable.

5.
And would it a UN court or US for the actions he has taken?
Click to expand...
Maybe your native language isn't English? in any case, I assume you are asking "Would he be tried in a UN court or a US court". See question number 1.

Other than accussing you of trolling, I've been perfectly, 100% on your topic. So respond, or admit this is a troll. Of course, all this assumes you are actually looking for discussion. Probably what is reality is you are a troll and should be treated as such. You couldn't argue your way out of a paper sack. Pitiful really. You make Passions look like a genius.
 
Originally posted by: steeplerot
Oh boy now Mr. Bleat & run is here... So much for asking a question that steps out of the P&N status quo of vanilla black and white backbiting drivel....
Click to expand...

Yes, yes you are here - fresh from your vacation. Now are you going to point out the crimes or was this thread just more trolling from you?

CkG
 
djeezes christ, someone get a moderator in here.
or the fire brigade, either one will do.

anyways, you still havent listed his crimes. lies, maybe (it's still more likely imho that he was fed wrong info, thus unknowingly told something which was not true but he didnt knew that) trampling some international laws, probably, but I'm not very educated on that stuff, and since the US does not recognise most international courts it can hardly be held in front of them.

so can you post some crimes please ? thank you.
 
Originally posted by: steeplerot
sure, the day you refute any of the crap you come in here and quip about then run off.
Click to expand...

😛 Care to back up your BS? Or was it just a troll thread?

*feeds more cookies to troll*

CkG
 
ugh here we go with the pointless arguing..
Mislead the American people into a unjust war.
Lying about involvement with enron buddies...
Prison scandal..
Lying to the american people.
10000 dead iraqis
900 dead soldiers
tons of profit off the blood of others.
many many other things that I would not call per-se crimes just things that make him a failed leader
also but these things are neither here nor there since I did not ask this in the topic.
Like I said go argue reasons in other threads I am not asking this a lot of people want to see him behind bars,
yes this is a bit more of a radical view then most people here but then people here mostly are a bit more reserved then me.
Sorry if you can't handle a leftist view not basiclly yours except for the few typical party issues.
Wouldn't the world be a better place if everyone agreed with you or if they disagreed they had a nice "safe" opinion.
blah think outside your box.
My views are pretty tame considering some people I know.
Trust me your holding on to archaic beliefs that evrything is ok and bush is just "staying the course" is just as ridiculous to me.
 
ugh here we go with the pointless arguing..
Click to expand...
Oh, that wasn't the intention of your post?

I assume you mean "alleged" about all of these of course...
Mislead the American people into a unjust war.
Click to expand...
Crime and relevant statute?
Lying about involvement with enron buddies...
Click to expand...
Crime and relevant statute?
Prison scandal..
Click to expand...
Crime and relevant statute?
qLying to the american people.
Click to expand...
Crime and relevant statute?
10000 dead iraqis
Click to expand...
Crime and relevant statute?
900 dead soldiers
Click to expand...
Crime and relevant statute?
tons of profit off the blood of others.
Click to expand...
Crime and relevant statute?
IMHO you won't find any for them, which is why you aren't posting any.

many many other things that I would not call per-se crimes just things that make him a failed leader
also but these things are neither here nor there since I did not ask this in the topic.
Like I said go argue reasons in other threads I am not asking this a lot of people want to see him behind bars,
yes this is a bit more of a radical view then most people here but then people here mostly are a bit more reserved then me.
Click to expand...
You don't say
Sorry if you can't handle a leftist view not basiclly yours except for the few typical party issues.
Wouldn't the world be a better place if everyone agreed with you or if they disagreed they had a nice "safe" opinion.
blah think outside your box.
My views are pretty tame considering some people I know.
Click to expand...
Now that's unsuprising
Trust me your holding on to archaic beliefs that evrything is ok and bush is just "staying the course" is just as ridiculous to me.
Click to expand...
The first thing you've said that makes sense. Yes, I do believe we are polar opposites. With one difference. I've explored the option that my "opinions" might be wrong. You've posted yours as fact. The hilarity is your "opinion" is about a crimes and a court of law, where "opinions" mean jack.

Now, we are starting to slowly get beyond the trolling stage here with you. I doubt we'll get much further, but you never know 😉

Would you care to address each of your claims of crimes, then we can start discussing jurisdiction? Although I believe that has already been adequately addressed with the simple statement that the US does not recognize the world court, and certainly would not recognize the world court for a trial of "Bush and Co.", short of the US being invaded and occupied by the rest of the world. But I'm certainly willing to discuss the legal issues.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top