Bush administration hires phony news agency...

[TastesLikeChicken]

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
More likely they are standing around laughing, watching you guys fluff each other and avoiding all the flying liberal man-juice.

Speaking of shameless fluffing:

"Thank you. Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak picture of the U.S. economy. [Senate Minority Leader] Harry Reid [D-NV] was talking about soup lines. And [Senator] Hillary Clinton [D-NY] was talking about the economy being on the verge of collapse. Yet in the same breath they say that Social Security is rock solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to work -- you've said you are going to reach out to these people -- how are you going to work with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?"

OMG!!!! How dare a reporter stray from the non-existent liberal press party line and not indict Bush or his staff with every question they ask? How DARE they ask why the Dumbocrats spout on about unity, but whose words nor actions seem to indicate any such desire? Why that's just terrible they didn't ask only the questions the liberals would want them to. Oh, and btw, hurray for free speech!

:roll:

If the above is not "fluffing", then why do you say the jokes and comments between liberals in this thread are "fluffing"? You seem to have a double standard for liberals and conservatives.

I do?

If so, it gives me something in common with the rest of the liberals in here.

I'm still waiting for someone to answer this:

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
I'm still trying to see where the article (from a site itself that seems no less biased than the one they are slamming) claims these guys were hired by Bush. Where does it claim they were paid by the Republican party or the White House to do this? Please show some direct proof.

Anybody?

Or is this thread title merely another example of the deluded liberal thinking that goes on in here?

I'm sorry that your little pea-brain can't READ or COMPREHEND what you're reading. Or maybe you didn't actually READ it? Probably not. I'm not your momma, I won't hold your hand.

Translation of Darkhawk's weak retort: "I have no real proof that these folks were actually paid by Bush. I simply decided to begin yet another liberal circle-jerk thread with a faulty, accusative title with no backup."

You're a lame POS.

 

[Darkhawk28]

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
More likely they are standing around laughing, watching you guys fluff each other and avoiding all the flying liberal man-juice.

Speaking of shameless fluffing:

"Thank you. Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak picture of the U.S. economy. [Senate Minority Leader] Harry Reid [D-NV] was talking about soup lines. And [Senator] Hillary Clinton [D-NY] was talking about the economy being on the verge of collapse. Yet in the same breath they say that Social Security is rock solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to work -- you've said you are going to reach out to these people -- how are you going to work with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?"

OMG!!!! How dare a reporter stray from the non-existent liberal press party line and not indict Bush or his staff with every question they ask? How DARE they ask why the Dumbocrats spout on about unity, but whose words nor actions seem to indicate any such desire? Why that's just terrible they didn't ask only the questions the liberals would want them to. Oh, and btw, hurray for free speech!

:roll:

If the above is not "fluffing", then why do you say the jokes and comments between liberals in this thread are "fluffing"? You seem to have a double standard for liberals and conservatives.

I do?

If so, it gives me something in common with the rest of the liberals in here.

I'm still waiting for someone to answer this:

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
I'm still trying to see where the article (from a site itself that seems no less biased than the one they are slamming) claims these guys were hired by Bush. Where does it claim they were paid by the Republican party or the White House to do this? Please show some direct proof.

Anybody?

Or is this thread title merely another example of the deluded liberal thinking that goes on in here?

I'm sorry that your little pea-brain can't READ or COMPREHEND what you're reading. Or maybe you didn't actually READ it? Probably not. I'm not your momma, I won't hold your hand.

Translation of Darkhawk's weak retort: "I have no real proof that these folks were actually paid by Bush. I simply decided to begin yet another liberal circle-jerk thread with a faulty, accusative title with no backup."

You're a lame POS.

READ THE F*CING ARTICLE. CLICK ON THE F*CING LINKS you G-D A-HOLE. You're the biggest POS in this place and that's saying something.

 

[TastesLikeChicken]

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
More likely they are standing around laughing, watching you guys fluff each other and avoiding all the flying liberal man-juice.

Speaking of shameless fluffing:

"Thank you. Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak picture of the U.S. economy. [Senate Minority Leader] Harry Reid [D-NV] was talking about soup lines. And [Senator] Hillary Clinton [D-NY] was talking about the economy being on the verge of collapse. Yet in the same breath they say that Social Security is rock solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to work -- you've said you are going to reach out to these people -- how are you going to work with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?"

OMG!!!! How dare a reporter stray from the non-existent liberal press party line and not indict Bush or his staff with every question they ask? How DARE they ask why the Dumbocrats spout on about unity, but whose words nor actions seem to indicate any such desire? Why that's just terrible they didn't ask only the questions the liberals would want them to. Oh, and btw, hurray for free speech!

:roll:

If the above is not "fluffing", then why do you say the jokes and comments between liberals in this thread are "fluffing"? You seem to have a double standard for liberals and conservatives.

I do?

If so, it gives me something in common with the rest of the liberals in here.

I'm still waiting for someone to answer this:

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
I'm still trying to see where the article (from a site itself that seems no less biased than the one they are slamming) claims these guys were hired by Bush. Where does it claim they were paid by the Republican party or the White House to do this? Please show some direct proof.

Anybody?

Or is this thread title merely another example of the deluded liberal thinking that goes on in here?

I'm sorry that your little pea-brain can't READ or COMPREHEND what you're reading. Or maybe you didn't actually READ it? Probably not. I'm not your momma, I won't hold your hand.

Translation of Darkhawk's weak retort: "I have no real proof that these folks were actually paid by Bush. I simply decided to begin yet another liberal circle-jerk thread with a faulty, accusative title with no backup."

You're a lame POS.

READ THE F*CING ARTICLE. CLICK ON THE F*CING LINKS you G-D A-HOLE. You're the biggest POS in this place and that's saying something.

I already read the article long ago. It provides no justification for your claim. That's why I asked the question which nobody has yet answered.

But keep up the foul-mouthed ranting and ad hom attacks in all caps. I'm sure all your 9-year old friends think it's just waaaaay kewl. U da bomb, baby.

::snicker::

 

[conjur]

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
READ THE F*CING ARTICLE. CLICK ON THE F*CING LINKS you G-D A-HOLE. You're the biggest POS in this place and that's saying something.

You probably should take a 10-minute break. The article doesn't state or even suggest the Bush admin hired them. I'm sure they're well-liked by the admin, though. 😉

 

[aidanjm]

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
More likely they are standing around laughing, watching you guys fluff each other and avoiding all the flying liberal man-juice.

Speaking of shameless fluffing:

"Thank you. Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak picture of the U.S. economy. [Senate Minority Leader] Harry Reid [D-NV] was talking about soup lines. And [Senator] Hillary Clinton [D-NY] was talking about the economy being on the verge of collapse. Yet in the same breath they say that Social Security is rock solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to work -- you've said you are going to reach out to these people -- how are you going to work with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?"

OMG!!!! How dare a reporter stray from the non-existent liberal press party line and not indict Bush or his staff with every question they ask? How DARE they ask why the Dumbocrats spout on about unity, but whose words nor actions seem to indicate any such desire? Why that's just terrible they didn't ask only the questions the liberals would want them to. Oh, and btw, hurray for free speech!

:roll:

If the above is not "fluffing", then why do you say the jokes and comments between liberals in this thread are "fluffing"? You seem to have a double standard for liberals and conservatives.

I do?

If so, it gives me something in common with the rest of the liberals in here.

You are acknowledging your own hypocrisy?

 

[aidanjm]

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
READ THE F*CING ARTICLE. CLICK ON THE F*CING LINKS you G-D A-HOLE. You're the biggest POS in this place and that's saying something.

You probably should take a 10-minute break. The article doesn't state or even suggest the Bush admin hired them. I'm sure they're well-liked by the admin, though. 😉

ON the other hand, there does seem to be a surprisingly high number of people from the Republican party working for this organisation. That makes one at least wonder at the possible presence of a financial link.

Maybe the thread description should be, "Phony news agency allows Bush to avoid answering difficult questions".

 

[Gaard]

Originally posted by: aidanjm

You are acknowledging your own hypocrisy?