• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Burress' eventual replacement?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Rockinacoustic
Until The Giants Prove they can't win without Buress, we don't need a big name receiver in his place.

looks like that very thing happened today.
 
Originally posted by: sao123
Originally posted by: Rockinacoustic
Until The Giants Prove they can't win without Buress, we don't need a big name receiver in his place.

looks like that very thing happened today.

The best receiver in the world can't catch a horrible throw -- Manning screwed the passing game, not necessarily the receivers. I'm not saying that Burress wasn't missed because he was. However, the Giants needed a better performance out of the offensive line, and they also needed a secondary that stopped a pass or two when it mattered. The Giants secondary is their weak point plus their linebackers are somewhat underwhelming to me (Pierce has played like crap since the bar incident with Plax).

They need to focus on a good safety and a good WR for next year. Maybe a kicker who can do better than 3 for 5 during a playoff game. :|
 
Back
Top