Burning a DVD at 1x or 2x makes a better copy than at higher speeds?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

wfn

Senior member
Feb 14, 2001
864
0
0
ok, here's the deal:

4x is best. why? simple: it's faster than 1x while still being CLV and the writing algorythm is based on ROPC of the drive rather than the media identifier code. 2x is the worst speed which was basically invented by Pioneer for the -R media and later picked up by Toshiba in their early drives. It was based on the media lookup table rather than a ROPC result. It is still an oddball for the -R compatible drives but most drives included it anyway in case you have older media (btw there is no provision for 2x in the original DVD-R General spec.). So to sum up the speed breakdown goes like this in the order of best to worst (for -R)

4x, 1x, 6x-16x , 2x

That being said, always buy quality media. I've burned 1000s of discs and I've owned almost every single Pioneer drive beginning with the 103 and quite a few NEC's starting with the 1300. You will regret dearly when if you use sh1tty media. I've had literally 10s discs go bad after a couple of years of usage. I have the best luck with a multitude of players using the -R media. My favorites are Taiyo Yuden G02 and Ritek G04. Every single disc I burned using those play everywhere including my xbox and ancient DVD players like the Pioneer DV-525.

 

techwanabe

Diamond Member
May 24, 2000
3,145
0
0
Ok,

Many talk about quality media vs shi++y media... for those of us who haven't read a bunch of detailed reviews, how do we know what is good or not? I mentioned I've had some problems getting perfect Music CD's burned if I am burning at speed of 8X or higher. I've done this on several different LiteOn drives which are supposed to be decent (my home LiteOn is 16X max and my work LiteOn was 32X max). The one at work, I was rarely ever able to get a perfect Music CD - it's slowest speed was 8X. Data CD's, no problem.

I've used the following CD media - Memorex 700mb/80min, Imation 700/80min and Fujifilm 700/80min

Probably the worst were the Imation - the Memorex were better and I haven't tried music CD's on the Fujifilm faster than 4X so far to avoid imperfect discs.

I'd like to get spindles of CD's and now DVD's for a good price, but it's a crap shoot if you don't know what to avoid and waht is decent.
 

Mem

Lifer
Apr 23, 2000
21,476
13
81
Many talk about quality media vs shi++y media... for those of us who haven't read a bunch of detailed reviews, how do we know what is good or not?

Since you`ve a Lite-On drive or should I say drives,try going and reading this,lots of good info :).
 

techwanabe

Diamond Member
May 24, 2000
3,145
0
0
Originally posted by: Mem
Many talk about quality media vs shi++y media... for those of us who haven't read a bunch of detailed reviews, how do we know what is good or not?

Since you`ve a Lite-On drive or should I say drives,try going and reading this,lots of good info :).

Actually my CDRW is a 16X LiteOn but my new Dell 16X DVDRW appears to be a Phillips.