Bulldozer on Windows 8 Consumer Preview

gibbs007

Member
Dec 8, 2011
91
0
0
This question is to anybody who owns AMD Bulldozer CPU and has installed Windows 8 CP: Is it any faster?
 

Borealis7

Platinum Member
Oct 19, 2006
2,901
205
106
the Kernel Scheduler is supposed to be more optimized for BD. multithreaded apps should see gains but for regular desktop use you wont see much difference.
 

exar333

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2004
8,518
8
91
Single-threaded performance gains negligable. Multi-threaded performance is minor, but better than Win7. From what has been reviewed so far, the gains are a few %.
 

superccs

Senior member
Dec 29, 2004
999
0
0
The main prob that the scheduler causes relates to how often turbo can be used. So at most think of performance of a 3Ghz cpu vs a 3.5 Ghz.
 

Edrick

Golden Member
Feb 18, 2010
1,939
230
106
Multi-threaded performance is minor, but better than Win7. From what has been reviewed so far, the gains are a few %.

And how much of that is general Win8 performance increase (for both Intel and AMD)?
 

exar333

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2004
8,518
8
91
And how much of that is general Win8 performance increase (for both Intel and AMD)?

Good question. I am hoping for a in-depth review on this now that the consumer preview is out (AT anyone? ;))

Based on what we saw with the Win7 patches, BD may see a little more performance jump vs. Intel, but it also could be that we see similar gains for both. If that is the case, it's really negligable for AMD because their competition also gained.
 

fixbsod

Senior member
Jan 25, 2012
415
0
0
I wanna see some benches and pretty graphs and things broken down to the thousandsths decimal place!!
 

Don Karnage

Platinum Member
Oct 11, 2011
2,865
0
0
Windows 8 isn't going to fix the putrid IPC of bulldozer. That is the real problem.
 

Idontcare

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
21,110
64
91
Why not just have a forum for AMD and one for Intel?

Segregation is anti-community.

This subforum exists for community interactions, building walls within the community is the exact opposite of the reason for the forum to exist in the first place.

Keeping everyone in the same room forces both sides to deal with the critiques of their position, a very healthy and robust part of community interaction.
 

Rvenger

Elite Member <br> Super Moderator <br> Video Cards
Apr 6, 2004
6,283
5
81
Segregation is anti-community.

This subforum exists for community interactions, building walls within the community is the exact opposite of the reason for the forum to exist in the first place.

Keeping everyone in the same room forces both sides to deal with the critiques of their position, a very healthy and robust part of community interaction.


Also keeps IDC busy :p
 

Chiropteran

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2003
9,811
110
106
I'm tempted to try this, but a couple things have been holding me back.

1- Not really unsatisfied with my windows 7 performance, so no need.

2- I'd rather stab my eye with a rusty fork than use the metro UI.

3- Don't want to format my SSD, and if I use a spare HDD for Windows 8 I won't get a real feel for it's true performance since it'll be on a slow spindle drive.

4- I'm lazy.
 

Subyman

Moderator <br> VC&G Forum
Mar 18, 2005
7,876
32
86
There were some reviews when the dev preview hit and they were very lackluster. I doubt much has changed since then.
 

frostedflakes

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2005
7,925
1
81
I wouldn't say lackluster, some situations saw some pretty decent gains in lightly threaded stuff. More CPU limited games like WoW saw between 8-12% performance improvement depending on resolution, for example.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/fx-8150-zambezi-bulldozer-990fx,3043-23.html

The Win 7 patch only seemed to improve things by up to 5% or so even in more CPU limited games, though, so Win 8 might have additional improvements that didn't make their way into the Win 7 hotfix.