Does anyone have any tips for building a PC so it is upgradable for as long as possible? I would like to gradually swap in new parts, rather than throw the whole thing on the scrap heap in 3 or 4 years and start over. Any tips from those who have succeeded? Or is this just a pipe dream
My thoughts and questions, for your critique:
(1) I should build it myself. That way I'll be more confident about opening it up and replacing stuff.
(2) The things which need to be upgraded soonest will probably be main memory and the video card (assuming I want to do a little gaming now and then). A motherboard which will handle 4 GB and a PCIe x16 video card will probably allow one good upgrade easily.
(3) Is it reasonable to hope to make it beyond one memory upgrade and one video card upgrade? I'm hoping for two memory and video card upgrades, and one upgrade each for the CPU and the hard drive.
(4) The right motherboard seems to be the key. When one gets a new motherboard, one probably wants all new interfaces -- and then one needs new stuff that plugs into those interfaces. That's what I'm trying to avoid.
(5) SLI and Crossfire are probably not good upgrade paths. Sure, I could pick up a used matching video card on eBay, if I go with SLI. But the performance boost looks like maybe 30% if one is lucky, and one would need to pay now for a motherboard and power supply capable of handling that setup.
(6) How important are expansion slots? What do y'all think about extra PCIe x16 or x4 slots? Can I expect to buy non-video expansion cards for those slots in a few years, if I get a motherboard that has extra such slots? I don't know, USB3.0, LightningWire, SATA-V (because interfaces have sequels), Rocky IX -- (oops). Maybe GPGPU-type parallel-processing applications a la Folding@home (but for me)? Or should I just be content with assorted PCI and PCIe x1 slots? The PCIe x1 slots don't look that much better on paper . . . though I could be wrong.
(7) My guess is, a motherboard which can handle no more than 4 GB of memory will be made obsolete first by that restriction; therefore I plan to get one that can handle an eventual upgrade to 8 GB. I think this will be more important to the longevity of the motherboard than SATA-II, Socket AM2/AM3, and possibly PCIe x16.
(8) As you may have guessed, I'm leaning toward AMD. Yeah, Core 2 Duo is a bit faster. But the Athlon X2 3800 is cheaper, and only a bit slower, from the perspective of years before it would require and upgrade. And since AMD just switched to AM2, and since they say AM3 processors will be backwards compatible, I'm leaning that way, despite the excitement over Core 2 Duo. Not trying to be a fanboy -- Intel definitely has the best processor now. But AMD may have the best upgrade path for trailing-edge types like me.
(9) With my luck, when I want a new motherboard, ATX will be obsolete, and I won't even get to keep my case. (My last desktop case was baby-AT.) (I have a notebook now.)
(10) How many +12v amps on the power supply?
(11) Maybe my motherboard will burn up in 4 years anyway?
OK, that's enough for now. Gimme some flames, tell me why I'm wrong, and I'll love you for it.
My thoughts and questions, for your critique:
(1) I should build it myself. That way I'll be more confident about opening it up and replacing stuff.
(2) The things which need to be upgraded soonest will probably be main memory and the video card (assuming I want to do a little gaming now and then). A motherboard which will handle 4 GB and a PCIe x16 video card will probably allow one good upgrade easily.
(3) Is it reasonable to hope to make it beyond one memory upgrade and one video card upgrade? I'm hoping for two memory and video card upgrades, and one upgrade each for the CPU and the hard drive.
(4) The right motherboard seems to be the key. When one gets a new motherboard, one probably wants all new interfaces -- and then one needs new stuff that plugs into those interfaces. That's what I'm trying to avoid.
(5) SLI and Crossfire are probably not good upgrade paths. Sure, I could pick up a used matching video card on eBay, if I go with SLI. But the performance boost looks like maybe 30% if one is lucky, and one would need to pay now for a motherboard and power supply capable of handling that setup.
(6) How important are expansion slots? What do y'all think about extra PCIe x16 or x4 slots? Can I expect to buy non-video expansion cards for those slots in a few years, if I get a motherboard that has extra such slots? I don't know, USB3.0, LightningWire, SATA-V (because interfaces have sequels), Rocky IX -- (oops). Maybe GPGPU-type parallel-processing applications a la Folding@home (but for me)? Or should I just be content with assorted PCI and PCIe x1 slots? The PCIe x1 slots don't look that much better on paper . . . though I could be wrong.
(7) My guess is, a motherboard which can handle no more than 4 GB of memory will be made obsolete first by that restriction; therefore I plan to get one that can handle an eventual upgrade to 8 GB. I think this will be more important to the longevity of the motherboard than SATA-II, Socket AM2/AM3, and possibly PCIe x16.
(8) As you may have guessed, I'm leaning toward AMD. Yeah, Core 2 Duo is a bit faster. But the Athlon X2 3800 is cheaper, and only a bit slower, from the perspective of years before it would require and upgrade. And since AMD just switched to AM2, and since they say AM3 processors will be backwards compatible, I'm leaning that way, despite the excitement over Core 2 Duo. Not trying to be a fanboy -- Intel definitely has the best processor now. But AMD may have the best upgrade path for trailing-edge types like me.
(9) With my luck, when I want a new motherboard, ATX will be obsolete, and I won't even get to keep my case. (My last desktop case was baby-AT.) (I have a notebook now.)
(10) How many +12v amps on the power supply?
(11) Maybe my motherboard will burn up in 4 years anyway?
OK, that's enough for now. Gimme some flames, tell me why I'm wrong, and I'll love you for it.
