beggerking
Golden Member
- Jan 15, 2006
- 1,703
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: Frackal
Dude I know you are a known fanboy so I'm not going to argue with you endlessly because I only care to the degree of defending the card which I just bought and really like.
But you are lying (again)
In the 7950GX2 review it doesn't beat the XT by 30% at 1600x1200 w/ 4xAA in ANY case, let alone most... particularly when you allow for an additional 5-10% in performance because AT failed to include the XTX which is a more fair comparison.
talk about fanboism..
If you actually READ my previous comment and the review before you accuse me of lying, you'll see I was only wondering why anyone would buy a XTX over and XT, which offers much better value.
btw, the 30% i'm talking about:
Text
in fear .. 1600x1200 4xAA
-gx2 = 72
-xt = 49
half-life2
-gx = 135
-xt = 108
Quake4 1600x1200 4xaa
-gx2 = 84
-xt = 63
X3
-gx2 = 66
-XT = 57