• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Building a "hybrid" HDD/SSD/Ramdrive - possible?

G

grepawking

Junior Member
I was looking at some WD 4TB drives and I came across one of their "blue" line models that was 4TB but also had 8GB of NAND Flash. The model is called "WD Blue SSHD" - desktop hard drive - 5400prm, SATA 6Gbps, 64MB cache - 3yr warranty - model WD40E31X with an astonishing price tag of $300 -390 depending upon where if is purchased.

Under features it lists:
Up to 5x faster than traditional 5400 rpm HDDs
Designed for power PC users, creative professionals, gamers and system builders
Usage - Ideal for Servers

For this price, I'm wondering if there isn't a way that I could incorporate some kind of 8-16GB stick of RAM (like a RAM DRIVE, completely dedicated 8-16GB of memory for a "middleman" in between the 4TB drive and the CPU. Or if there is another way or using some other SSD drive from 8GB up to 64GB in conjunction with the 4TB drive. I just cant' see how this would be impossible or extremely difficult, as I've used Ramdrives before and they have made some systems amazingly fast in some areas (when I had 32-64GB of dedicated RAM Drives working with either a very fast SSD or RAID 0 SSD - and even some good quality physical HDD's).

I just don't like the idea of using their blue model for this. Seagate had a similar product years back and I thought it was kind of a dog, though my application might not have suited this.

Does anyone know if something like this can be made from 2 other parts and if so, how would a hybrid drive be made?
 
Primo Cache can do this.

Those SSHDs are mostly junk. 8GB of NAND isn't nearly enough to be useful. I wouldn't bother with anything less than 32GB of NAND.
 
cfenton said:
Primo Cache can do this.

Those SSHDs are mostly junk. 8GB of NAND isn't nearly enough to be useful. I wouldn't bother with anything less than 32GB of NAND.
Click to expand...

Weeeeelll... realistically, any amount of NAND will make a pretty good write cache, if that's a bottleneck for you.

But, yeah. With game installs over 50GB now, it's not of much use as a read cache except maybe to lower boot times or something. Nice for benchmarks, not useful day to day.
 
dave_the_nerd said:
Weeeeelll... realistically, any amount of NAND will make a pretty good write cache, if that's a bottleneck for you.

But, yeah. With game installs over 50GB now, it's not of much use as a read cache except maybe to lower boot times or something. Nice for benchmarks, not useful day to day.
Click to expand...

Do you mean if you were running out of RAM and writing to the page file? Or is there something I'm not thinking of? 8GB would be useless for any substantial sustained data transfer.
 
cfenton said:
Do you mean if you were running out of RAM and writing to the page file? Or is there something I'm not thinking of? 8GB would be useless for any substantial sustained data transfer.
Click to expand...

No, I mean if you have to write some random data to a drive, don't want to wait long, and want a synchronous write (so, no ram-based write caching - because that's volatile.)

Database servers would generate that sort of load.
 
dave_the_nerd said:
No, I mean if you have to write some random data to a drive, don't want to wait long, and want a synchronous write (so, no ram-based write caching - because that's volatile.)

Database servers would generate that sort of load.
Click to expand...

Fair enough, I was thinking of client workloads.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top