Originally posted by: ArchAngel777
Let me set the record straight. First, when Aigo said PCT2 or whoever, he meant me. Simply mistake, we all have it. Second, Aigo is 100% correct.
Only a few people are affected by IP35-E. Why you ask? Simple. Because most people do not have the cooling that allows for increased Vcore to where this board starts to take a shit. Also, I am not sure it is an actual voltage issue, more of a wattage issue, in my opinion.
From what I have seen, the G0's can take 1.5v just fine with the IP35-E. But that isn't because the G0's are better, but because they require less wattage. I am absolutely positive that a G0 at 1.55+ will shutdown the IP35-E in small FFT. The problem is, not many people will run a G0 at 1.55v. So, it is basically a non issue for a G0 owner, unless you are really pushing your chip the edge.
So, to clarify, if you have really good cooling and want some extreme overclocks, avoid the IP35-E. If you just want an 'average' overclock and a cheapo board to go with it, take the IP35-E, it will suite you just fine. Since this particular user is looking for a cheapo low end system, he should be fine with the IP35-E. But that doesn't mean that I particularly like the board. If I could do it over again, I would have never purchased the board due to the wattage/voltage limition.
I have verified this issue with 5 B3's, and one X6800 (dual core). The X6800 didn't experience these problems until 1.6v. Problem is, many people do run their dual cores at that voltage, even Dell offers a warranteed system of C2D (G0) at 1.6v. But, again, you have to understand that the reason this issue has not come up more is because most people do not have the cooling to push their CPU high enough to show the cracks in the IP35-E.
Keep in mind, many people who claim extreme overclocks do not often run hardcore stability tests. Many people tend to lie and or exaggerate what their computer wiull do and how stable it is. So, I'd believe someone who said he couldn't get a certain clock speed at a certain voltage over someone who said they can do it! People are less likely to make their system look less than what it really is, but are more likely to spout off in some forum that they can get some ridiculous numbers with *stability* which includes booting into Windows! Hah!