• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

buffer size vs rpm in hd

triska

Platinum Member
Jul 30, 2001
2,409
0
76
i was curious
what the major difference would be between the 7200 rpm hd for laptop i hear about
vs a 5400 rpm w/ a large buffer?
like is sound a problem with teh 7200 cuz it spins faster?
pros? cons?
 

rimshaker

Senior member
Dec 7, 2001
722
0
0
The spindle speed will affect your performance the most, so go for the 7200rpm drive. If it were a choice between a 7200rpm 8MB buffer vs. 5400rpm 16MB buffer, hands down the 7200rpm drive would be the choice.

With today's fluid-bearing technology, noise is less of an issue nowadays.
 

Mellman

Diamond Member
Jul 9, 2003
3,083
0
76
Originally posted by: rimshaker
The spindle speed will affect your performance the most, so go for the 7200rpm drive. If it were a choice between a 7200rpm 8MB buffer vs. 5400rpm 16MB buffer, hands down the 7200rpm drive would be the choice.

With today's fluid-bearing technology, noise is less of an issue nowadays.



agreed.....also important to remember, data density on laptop drives is higher then equivalent desktop drives...but i had a 5400 rpm drive...upgraded to a 7200 and OMG i'll never go back. Its amazing :)
 

Matthias99

Diamond Member
Oct 7, 2003
8,808
0
0
THG article

Actually, the 7200RPM drives don't dent your battery life much, if at all. There are two factors at work here -- first, the drives are generally more efficient power-wise (the uber-cheap 4200RPM drives that most notebook manufacturers use are not), and second, the drive spends less time actively reading data (since it's faster), which lets it sit in a low-power state more often than the slower disk.
 

Sahakiel

Golden Member
Oct 19, 2001
1,746
0
86
Originally posted by: Matthias99
THG article

Actually, the 7200RPM drives don't dent your battery life much, if at all. There are two factors at work here -- first, the drives are generally more efficient power-wise (the uber-cheap 4200RPM drives that most notebook manufacturers use are not), and second, the drive spends less time actively reading data (since it's faster), which lets it sit in a low-power state more often than the slower disk.

Comparing the Hitachi 7200RPM drive to my Hitachi 4200RPM drive, the specs listed showed the 7200RPM drive using between .1-.3W more across the board. Given a 48WHr battery and a run time of about 3:30, it basically shaved off about 30 minutes.
This is without comparing actual usage statistics.
 

nortexoid

Diamond Member
May 1, 2000
4,096
0
0
Originally posted by: Matthias99
THG article

Actually, the 7200RPM drives don't dent your battery life much, if at all. There are two factors at work here -- first, the drives are generally more efficient power-wise (the uber-cheap 4200RPM drives that most notebook manufacturers use are not), and second, the drive spends less time actively reading data (since it's faster), which lets it sit in a low-power state more often than the slower disk.

interesting
 

Sahakiel

Golden Member
Oct 19, 2001
1,746
0
86
Originally posted by: jagec
yeah, but if you get work done that much faster anyway...;)

Either way, even idle power usage is higher with the 7200 rpm drive.