buffer size vs rpm in hd

triska

Platinum Member
Jul 30, 2001
2,409
0
76
i was curious
what the major difference would be between the 7200 rpm hd for laptop i hear about
vs a 5400 rpm w/ a large buffer?
like is sound a problem with teh 7200 cuz it spins faster?
pros? cons?
 

rimshaker

Senior member
Dec 7, 2001
722
0
0
The spindle speed will affect your performance the most, so go for the 7200rpm drive. If it were a choice between a 7200rpm 8MB buffer vs. 5400rpm 16MB buffer, hands down the 7200rpm drive would be the choice.

With today's fluid-bearing technology, noise is less of an issue nowadays.
 

Mellman

Diamond Member
Jul 9, 2003
3,083
0
76
Originally posted by: rimshaker
The spindle speed will affect your performance the most, so go for the 7200rpm drive. If it were a choice between a 7200rpm 8MB buffer vs. 5400rpm 16MB buffer, hands down the 7200rpm drive would be the choice.

With today's fluid-bearing technology, noise is less of an issue nowadays.



agreed.....also important to remember, data density on laptop drives is higher then equivalent desktop drives...but i had a 5400 rpm drive...upgraded to a 7200 and OMG i'll never go back. Its amazing :)
 

Matthias99

Diamond Member
Oct 7, 2003
8,808
0
0
THG article

Actually, the 7200RPM drives don't dent your battery life much, if at all. There are two factors at work here -- first, the drives are generally more efficient power-wise (the uber-cheap 4200RPM drives that most notebook manufacturers use are not), and second, the drive spends less time actively reading data (since it's faster), which lets it sit in a low-power state more often than the slower disk.
 

Sahakiel

Golden Member
Oct 19, 2001
1,746
0
86
Originally posted by: Matthias99
THG article

Actually, the 7200RPM drives don't dent your battery life much, if at all. There are two factors at work here -- first, the drives are generally more efficient power-wise (the uber-cheap 4200RPM drives that most notebook manufacturers use are not), and second, the drive spends less time actively reading data (since it's faster), which lets it sit in a low-power state more often than the slower disk.

Comparing the Hitachi 7200RPM drive to my Hitachi 4200RPM drive, the specs listed showed the 7200RPM drive using between .1-.3W more across the board. Given a 48WHr battery and a run time of about 3:30, it basically shaved off about 30 minutes.
This is without comparing actual usage statistics.
 

nortexoid

Diamond Member
May 1, 2000
4,096
0
0
Originally posted by: Matthias99
THG article

Actually, the 7200RPM drives don't dent your battery life much, if at all. There are two factors at work here -- first, the drives are generally more efficient power-wise (the uber-cheap 4200RPM drives that most notebook manufacturers use are not), and second, the drive spends less time actively reading data (since it's faster), which lets it sit in a low-power state more often than the slower disk.

interesting
 

Sahakiel

Golden Member
Oct 19, 2001
1,746
0
86
Originally posted by: jagec
yeah, but if you get work done that much faster anyway...;)

Either way, even idle power usage is higher with the 7200 rpm drive.