Bronx cop assasinated

[Azuma Hazuki]

That was a work of art, @xthetenth. I have got to class it up some and learn from you.

 

[Phynaz]

The so called proggies here don't like getting called out for their shit.

Good, good, let the hate flow through you.

 

[Azuma Hazuki]

Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against their own unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others.[1] For example, a person who is habitually rude may constantly accuse other people of being rude. It incorporates blame shifting.

Give us a selfie so we can update ye olde Pedia of Wikie.

 

[JSt0rm]

The so called proggies here don't like getting called out for their shit.

Good, good, let the hate flow through you.

look at this cuck snowflake.

 

[JEDIYoda]

You can't seem to wrap your head around the fact that Public Safety Officer was shot down in cold blood in her own neighborhood. She worked where she lived, protecting her own neighbors.

Are you sure she was protecting her own?? Or are you assuming she was "protecting" her own??

 

[Azuma Hazuki]

I think he's assuming a long string of racial epithets, TBH. And "butbutbut MUH BLACKONBLACK CRIIIIIIIME!"

 

[xthetenth]

The so called proggies here don't like getting called out for their shit.

Good, good, let the hate flow through you.

You haven't called me out on anything. You've comprehensively avoided reading my arguments because you know you can't stand up to them. You started this thread ready for a fight against a strawman and you've been trading shots with that strawman because your views can't survive contact with my arguments and you know it, so you misrepresent me as a defense mechanism. You're just another near-interchangeable example of "conservatives" adopting thought patterns that amount to an intellectual autoimmune disorder.

I defy you to quote and reply to my arguments about your execrable behavior in this thread in such a way that you demonstrate that you have read them and actually processed them. I'll let you in on a secret though, when I talk about how I'll forgive people if they do stuff like that, it's entirely to twist the knife because I know they can't. You're too predictable. You're looking for something to tell yourself you can be angry about and dismiss the rest. You're just another addict to the five minute's hate and you can't look too closely at who we are and what our words are lest we stop looking like Emmanuel Goldstein.

You're not worth hate, just the sort of disdain where I craft increasingly florid insults for my own amusement. Your utter failure at morality and argumentation is frankly inspiring. I hope you find yourself walking through a desert with nothing but a spittoon of someone else's chewing tobacco spit for hydration. Have a nice day, and I hope you learn and grow as a person who can actually hold a conversation rather than serving as a punching bag to riff on so I can get laughs out of Azuma.

 

[Phynaz]

so I can get laughs out of Azuma.

Oh, is she replying to me? I have her on ignore so I didn't know. It's funny, I even told her I put her on ignore and she's still writing to me. You've got to be pretty dumb to keep posting to somebody who has told you they won't see the posts. It's like those little yap yap dogs that never shut up, barking at nothing at all.

 

[Azuma Hazuki]

So if he's got me on ignore, why can I still see his bullshit?

 

[xthetenth]

Oh, is she replying to me? I have her on ignore so I didn't know. It's funny, I even told her I put her on ignore and she's still writing to me. You've got to be pretty dumb to keep posting to somebody who has told you they won't see the posts. It's like those little yap yap dogs that never shut up, barking at nothing at all.

Why don't you just put me on ignore then, since you can't answer any of what I post anyway, and I can keep on making a mockery of you for the passersby?

If you're really curious, that's what she's already doing, as am I. Posting with an actual expectation of it being read and getting a response from you about anything substantive is like trying to start a farm on Pluto.

It's honestly disappointing. I keep posting these nice responses to you and I get nothing back that challenges my assertions and helps me refine my understanding, it's just tilting at strawmen that bear no resemblance to me.

 

[disappoint]

So if he's got me on ignore, why can I still see his bullshit?

Because you don't have him on ignore?

 

[xthetenth]

Oh incidentally, Azuma, how did he manage to be such a remarkably awful person in the processors forum? How do you even manage that? I mean, having seen his behavior here I believe it a hundred percent without examples, I just want to know how he pulled it off?

 

[Phynaz]

Why don't you just put me on ignore then

Azuma's irrational hate filled posts add no value to my web browsing. In the 11 years I've been a member here she's only the fourth person to make my ignore list, so as you can see it takes a really special person to make my ignore list - somebody who is such a gargantuan moron that their writings have no value at all.

Your posts amuse me.

 

[FIVR]

It took me reading all of about 2 of his posts to realize that @Phynaz is just a stupid republican troll, and not worth conversing with at all. How have you all been here for years and still don't know this?



Just ignore him. I don't even put him on "ignore" because his posts are so inconsequential. I could read 10,000 of them and learn nothing, so to me they look like ads or like any other dialogue box that pops up on the forum. He's just scenery.

 

[xthetenth]

Your posts amuse me.

It's a shame you don't read them in their entirety. They might enlighten you or present you with interesting worldviews you hadn't considered previously.

 

[Azuma Hazuki]

Oh incidentally, Azuma, how did he manage to be such a remarkably awful person in the processors forum? How do you even manage that? I mean, having seen his behavior here I believe it a hundred percent without examples, I just want to know how he pulled it off?

It's a pattern of his. He has a rather sociopathic, almost Calvinist outlook on, for example, the illegal activities Intel pulled vs. AMD during the Clawhammer/K8 era. The impression I get is he's perfectly okay with it, as winning is the only thing that matters. No one single post of his sums it up too well but you can search his post history in that forum to get an idea. I'll see if i can find some examples...

 

[xthetenth]

It's a pattern of his. He has a rather sociopathic, almost Calvinist outlook on, for example, the illegal activities Intel pulled vs. AMD during the Clawhammer/K8 era. The impression I get is he's perfectly okay with it, as winning is the only thing that matters. No one single post of his sums it up too well but you can search his post history in that forum to get an idea. I'll see if i can find some examples...

Ahh. Interesting. I appreciate it if you want to go looking, but I don't expect you to take the time for it.

 

[Phynaz]

@Phynaz republican

Nope. Try again, but add a little flourish to your post like xthetenth does. It keeps things interesting.

 

[Azuma Hazuki]

The coward has his profile blocked off from normal users Probably for the precise reason he doesn't want anyone to go looking through it and digging up his past assholery.

 

[Phynaz]

It's a shame you don't read them in their entirety. They might enlighten you or present you with interesting worldviews you hadn't considered previously.

Oh, I do read your entire posts. Like I said they are amusing. They help pass the time at work.

 

[agent00f]

The so called proggies here don't like getting called out for their shit.

Good, good, let the hate flow through you.

Azuma's irrational hate filled posts add no value to my web browsing. In the 11 years I've been a member here she's only the fourth person to make my ignore list, so as you can see it takes a really special person to make my ignore list - somebody who is such a gargantuan moron that their writings have no value at all.

Your posts amuse me.

You seem to think people should care about the expressed opinions of liars.

 

[xthetenth]

Oh, I do read your entire posts. Like I said they are amusing. They help pass the time at work.

Then how come you don't respond to most of the content? Inability?

 

[woolfe9998]

Since Phynaz isn't replying to the substance of what you're saying, I'll reply here, noting that I partially agree and partially disagree with you. See below:

Nope! The person who did this is a criminal. Criminals get chased down and if they don't get shot resisting arrest they're arrested, tried, found guilty and put in prison.

Actually, the person in question is not a common criminal. Since he expressed a desire to kill police in retaliation for cases like Eric Garner and Freddie Grey, his actions are more akin to those of the Dallas shooter, which is to say, it was politically motivated terrorism. Or at least politically motivated violence. The danger with this sort of thing is that it encourages others to take similar action for similar reasons, and because it may - wrongly - cast a movement like BLM, who otherwise has legitimate grievances, as being associated with violent intent toward police. Under the circumstances, viewing this like he was some guy high on meth who shot a cop after robbing a convenience store isn't really doing justice to the importance of his conduct.

As opposed to people who shoot people who pose no threat to them but do so while wearing a police uniform. Those people get indicted, get a paid vacation, occasionally get wildly successful gofundme campaigns, and maybe if they're incredibly unlucky actually get tried.

I agree with you, that police are not prosecuted or convicted as often as they should be. I'm just not so sure that raising this point in this context does anything other than distract from the real issue here, which is that whatever our grievances against cops, violence against cops is clearly not the answer. I'm not saying you disagree with that or that you condone this because clearly you do not. I'm just saying that what one chooses to focus discussion on is a reflection of their priorities. So if, for example, one chooses to raise an issue that the police could maybe in theory have wrongfully shot someone else, and doing so only a few posts into the thread, without saying anything else, one may give the impression that this person would rather focus on cop bashing than addressing the conduct which is the subject of the thread, because that person knows this conduct is indefensible and they'd rather discuss something else.

So in summary, it's not that you're wrong about the police often not facing consequences when they should. And it isn't that there's no legitimate concern over a bystander. It's a question of emphasis and priorities.

 

[Phynaz]

^ Well said.

 

[Phynaz]

Then how come you don't respond to most of the content? Inability?

Why is my responding to your thoughts so important to you? You seem to be reaching out for my attention. Are you an only child that is missing the approval of an authority figure?